Tutor roles in facilitating reflection on practice through online discussion

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 61-72

  Guldberg, Karen ^a   Pilkington, Rachel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dialogue and learning; E moderation; Online discussion groups; Tutor roles

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947668793     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Berzsenyi, C. A. (1999). Teaching interlocutor relationships in electronic classrooms. Computers and Composition, 16, 229-246.
2. Bruner, J. S. (1983) Child's talk: learning to use language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Clark, J. (2001). Stimulating collaboration and discussion in online learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 4(2), 119-124.
4. Desanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group support systems. Management Science, 33 (5), 589-609.
5. Engeström, Y. (1999). Perspectives on Activity Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Fung, Y. Y. H. (2004). Collaborative online learning: interaction patterns and limiting factors. Open Learning, 19 (2), 135-147.
7. st Century, London: Routledge Palmer.
8. Goodyear, P. (2001). Effective networked learning in higher education: notes and guidelines. Deliverable 9 (Vol. 3) of the Final Report to JCALT, Lancaster: Networked Learning in Higher Education Project (JCALT).
9. Gibson, W., Hall, A., & Callery, P. (2006). Topicality and the structure of interactive talk in face-to-face seminar discussions: implications for research in distributed learning media. British Educational Research Journal, 32 (1), 77-94.
10. Guldberg, K. K., & Pilkington, R. M. (2006). A community of practice approach to the development of non-traditional learners through networked learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22 (3), 159-172.
11. Hakkinen, P., & Jarvela, S. (2006). Sharing and constructing perspectives in web-based conferencing. Computers and Education, 47 (4), 433-447.
12. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 117-136.
13. Hung, D. W., & Chen, D. T. (2001). Situated cognition, Vygotskian thought and learning from the communities of practice perspective: Implications for the design of web based e-learning, Education Media International, 38 (4), 281-28.
14. Jones, C. (2004). Networks and learning: communities, practices and the metaphor of networks. ALT-J, 12 (1), 82-93.
15. Jones, E. J., & Cooke, L. (2006). A window into learning: case studies of online group communication and collaboration. ALT-J, 14 (3), 261-274.
16. Kneser, C., Pilkington, R., & Treasure-Jones, T. (2001). The tutor's role: an investigation of the power of exchange structure analysis to identify different roles in CMC seminars. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 63-84.
17. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning, New Jersey: Practice Hall.
18. nd Ed.), London: Routledge.
19. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1999). Learning and pedagogy in communities of practice. In Leach, J. & Moon, B. (Eds.), Learners and pedagogy, London: PcP.
20. Macdonald, J. (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product. Computers and Education, 40, 377-391.
21. McConnell, D. (1994). Implementing computer supported learning, London: Kogan Page.
22. Mercer, N. (1995). The Guided Construction of Knowledge, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon & Philadelphia.
23. Oliver, M. (2006). New pedagogies for e-learning? ALT-J, 14 (2), 133-134.
24. Pilkington, R. M. (2003). Reflecting on roles: Using synchronous CMC to develop a knowledge-building community amongst post-graduates. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 13 (3/4), 318-335.
25. Pilkington, R. M., & Walker, S. A. (2003). Using CMC to develop argumentation skills in children with a literacy deficit. In J. Adriessen, M. Baker & Suthers, D. (Eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments, Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic, 144-175.
26. Pilkington, R. M., & Kuminek, P. A. (2004). Using a role-play activity with synchronous CMC to encourage critical reflection on peer debate. In M. Monteith (Ed.), ICT for Curriculum Enhancement, Bristol: Intellect, 83-99.
27. Robson, C. (1993). Real World Research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner researchers, Oxford: Blackwell.
28. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating. The key to teaching and learning online, London: Kogan Page.
29. Salmon, G. (2002). E-tivities: the key to active online learning, London: Kogan Page.
30. Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2006). Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. Computers and Education, 46 (4), 349-370.
31. Schon, D, A. (1987). Educating the reflective Practitioner, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1992). Towards an analysis of discourse. In Coulthard, M. (Ed.), Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis, London and New York: Routledge, 1-34.
33. Veerman, A. L. Andriessen, J. E. B., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Learning through synchronous electronic discussion. Computers and Education, 34 (3/4), 269-290.
34. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Yin, R. (1991). Case study research: Design and Methods, London and New Delhi: Sage.