Concept mapping in science class: A case study of fifth grade students

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 186-195

  Asan, Askin ^a  

^a SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY   (Oman)

Author keywords

Computer based concept mapping; Concept mapping; Inspiration; Science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947662911     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alvermann, D. E., & Boothby, P. R. (1983). A preliminary investigation of the differences in children's retention of inconsiderate text. Reading Psychology, 4 (4), 237-246.
2. Alvermann, D. E., & Boothby, P. R. (1986). Children's transfer of graphic organizer instruction. Reading Psychology, 7(2), 87-100.
3. Anderson-Inman, L., & Zeith, L. (1993). Computer-based concept-mapping: Active studying for active learners. The Computing Teacher, 20 (1), 6-11.
4. Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Meyer, J. L. (1991). Improving content-area reading using instructional graphics. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(4), 393-416.
5. Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view, New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
6. Bagci Kilic, G. (2003). Concept maps and language: a Turkish experience. International Journal of Science Education, 25 (11), 1299-1311.
7. Braselton, S., & Decker, C. (1994). Using graphic organizers to improve the reading of mathematics. Reading Teacher, 48(3), 276-81.
8. Cohen, D. (1987). The use of concept maps to represent unique thought processes: Toward more meaningful learning. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2 (3), 285-289.
9. DeWispelaere, C., & Kossack, J. (1996). Improving student higher order thinking skills through the use of graphic organizers, Elk Grove Village, IL: Master's Thesis, Saint Xavier University.
10. Duru, M. K., & Gurdal, A. (2002). The Effects of Concept Mapping on Student Achievement. In proceedings of the V. National Conference on Science and Mathematics Education.
11. Fisher, K. M. (1990). Semantic networking: The new kid on the block. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 27, 1001-1018.
12. Griffin, C., Malone, L, & Kameenui, E. (1995). Effects of graphic organizer instruction on fifth-grade students. Journal of Educational Research, 89 (2), 98-107.
13. Guastello, E. F., Beasley, T. M., & Sinatra, R. C. (2000). Concept mapping effects on science content comprehension of low-achieving inner-city seventh graders. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 356-366.
14. Gurley, L. I. (1982). Use of Gowin's vee and concept mapping strategies to teach responsibility for learning in high school biological sciences, Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
15. Hawk, P. (1986). Using graphic organizers to increase achievement in middle school life science. Science Education, 70(1), 81-87.
16. Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge. Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Kinnear, J., Gleeson, D, & Comerford, C. (1985). Use of concept maps in assessing the value of a computer-based activity in biology. Research in Science Education, 15, 103-111.
18. Kommers, P. (1995). Teaching and Learning with Concept Mapping Tools and Hypermedia. In E. Orhun, C. Holmes, C. Bowerman & M. Vivet (Eds.) Computer-Based Tools for Teaching and Learning, Izmir: Ege University Press, 117-128..
19. Kopec, D., Wood, C., & Brody, M. (1990/91). Using cognitive mapping techniques for educating about sexually transmitted diseases with an intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2 (2), 67-82.
20. Lawson, M.J. (1994). Concept Mapping. In T. Husen & T.N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education, Oxford: Elsevier Science, 2, 1026-1031.
21. Linn, R.L., & Gronlund, N.E. (1995). Measurement and assessment in teaching, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
22. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Novak, J. D. (1993). How do we learn our lesson?: Taking students through the process. Science Teacher, 60 (3), 50-55.
24. Pankratius, W. J. (1990). Building an organized knowledge base: Concept mapping and achievement in secondary school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27 (4), 315-333.
25. Ritchie, D., & Volkl, C. (2000). Effectiveness of two generative learning strategies in the science classroom. School Science and Mathematics, 100 (2), 83-89.
26. Simmons, D., Griffin, C., & Kameenui, E (1988). Effects of teacher-constructed pre- and post-graphic organizer instruction on sixth grade science students' comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Research, 82 (1), 15-21.
27. Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, O. (2001). The contribution of conceptual change texts accompanied by concept mapping to students' understanding of the human circulatory system. School Science and Mathematics, 101 (2), 91-101.
28. Starr, M. L., & Krajcik, J. S. (1990). Concept maps as a heuristic for science curriculum development: Toward improvement in process and product. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 987-1000.
29. Wandersee, J. H. (1987). Drawing concept circles: A new way to teach and test students. Science Activities, 24 (4), 1, 9-20.
30. Willerman, M., & Mac Harg, R.A. (1991). The concept map as an advance organizer. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 705-711.