Offensive Advertising, Public Policy, and the Law: The Rulings on the Zagorka Case

Journal of Consumer Policy

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 475-493

  Millan, Elena ^a   Elliott, Richard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Economic Policy; Europe; Public Body; Public Interest; Public Policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947628046     PISSN: 01687034     EISSN: 15730700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10603-004-2719-0     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. L.FeickH.Gierl1996Scepticism about advertising: A comparison of East and West German consumersInternational Journal of Research in Marketing13227235
2. G.GerR.Belk1996Cross-cultural differences in materialismJournal of Economic Psychology175577
3. P.GlickS. T.Fiske1996The ambivalent sexist inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexismJournal of Personality and Social Psychology70491512
4. L. V.KarakashevaB. N.Boeva1979Organisation and management of the foreign economic activity in the capitalist countriesHigher Institute of Economics “Karl Marx”Sofia
5. H.Kelly-Holmes1998The discourse of Western marketing professionals in Central and Eastern Europe: Their role in the creation of a context for marketing and advertising messagesDiscourse & Society9339362
6. K.Merdjanska1997Forked tongue: On gender stereotypes in the Bulgarian language.T.RenneAna’s land: Sisterhood in Eastern EuropeWestview PressBoulder, CO158163
7. A.Peltonen1995Preliminary ruling on discriminatory advertisingJournal of Consumer Policy18219235
8. S.SverdrupE.StÃ1992Regulation of sex discrimination in advertising: An empirical enquiry into the Norwegian caseJournal of Consumer Policy14371391