The return of object-based attention: Selection of multiple-region objects

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1163-1175

  Matsukura, Michi ^a,b   Vecera, Shaun P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b The University of Iowa   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947527642     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193718     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. AWH, E., DHAUWAL, H., CHRISTENSEN, S., & MATSUKURA, M. (2001). Evidence for two components of object-based selection. Psychological Science, 12, 329-334.
2. BAYLIS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451-470.
3. BECK, D. M., & PALMER, S. E. (2002). Top-down influences on perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1071-1084.
4. BEHRMANN, M., ZEMEL, R. S., & MOZER, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1011-1036.
5. DOWNING, C. J., & PINKER, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 171-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. DUNCAN, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
7. EOLY, R., DRIVER, J., & RAFAL, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
8. ERIKSEN, B. A., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
9. ERIKSEN, C. W., & ST. JAMES, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225-240.
10. ERIKSEN, C. W., & YEH, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 583-597.
11. HOFFMAN, D. D., & RICHARDS, W. A. (1984). Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65-96.
12. HOFFMAN, D. D., & SINGH, M. (1997). Salience of visual parts. Cognition, 63, 29-78.
13. IVANOFF, J., KLEIN, R. M., & LUPIÁ ÑEZ, J. (2002). Inhibition of return interacts with the Simon effect: An omnibus analysis and its implications. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 318-327.
14. KRAMER, A. F., & JACOBSON, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267-284.
15. KRAMER, A. F., WEBER, T. A., & WATSON, S. E. (1997). Object-based attentional selection - Grouped arrays or spatially invariant representations?: Comment on Vecera and Farah (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 3-13.
16. LABERGE, D., & BROWN, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
17. LAMY, D., & EGETH, H. (2002). Object-based selection: The role of attentional shifts. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 52-66.
18. LEE, D., & CHUN, M. M. (2001). What are the units of visual short-term memory, objects or spatial locations? Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 253-257.
19. LOFTUS, G. R., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
20. MOORE, C. M., YANTIS, S., & VAUGHAN, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9, 104-110.
21. PALMER, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. PALMER, S. E. (2002). Perceptual organization in vision. In H. Pashler & S. Yantis (Eds.), Stevens' Handbook of experimental psychology, Vol. 1: Sensation and perception (3rd ed., pp. 177-234). New York: Wiley.
23. PALMER, S. [E.], & ROCK, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 29-55.
24. POSNER, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
25. PRATT, J., & SEKULER, A. B. (2001). The effects of occlusion and past experience on the allocation of object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 721-727.
26. REPPA, I., & LEEK, E. C. (2003). The modulation of inhibition of return by object-internal structure: Implications for theories of object-based attentional selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 493-502.
27. VECERA, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 316-320.
28. VECERA, S. P. (1997). Grouped arrays versus object-based representations: Reply to Kramer et al. (1997). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 14-18.
29. VECERA, S. P., & FARAH, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 146-160.
30. WATSON, S. E., & KRAMER, A. F. (1999). Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 31-49.
31. WERTHEIMER, M. (1923/1958). Principles of perceptual organization. In D. C. Beardslee & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Readings in perception (pp. 115-135). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.