-
1
-
-
1342266715
-
The balanced scorecard; judgemental effects of performance measures linked to strategy
-
Banker, R.D., Chang, H. and Pizzini, M. (2004), “The balanced scorecard; judgemental effects of performance measures linked to strategy”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 79 No. 1, pp. 1-23.
-
(2004)
The Accounting Review
, vol.79
, Issue.1
, pp. 1-23
-
-
Banker, R.D.1
Chang, H.2
Pizzini, M.3
-
2
-
-
0042657961
-
Components and relative weights in utilization of dashboard measurement systems like the Balanced Scorecard
-
DeBusk, G.K., Brown, R.M. and Killough, L.N. (2003), “Components and relative weights in utilization of dashboard measurement systems like the Balanced Scorecard”, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 35, pp. 215-231.
-
(2003)
The British Accounting Review
, vol.35
, pp. 215-231
-
-
DeBusk, G.K.1
Brown, R.M.2
Killough, L.N.3
-
3
-
-
8744256617
-
Relative weighting of common and unique Balanced Scorecard measures by knowledgeable decision makers
-
Dilla, W.N. and Steinbart, P.J. (2005), “Relative weighting of common and unique Balanced Scorecard measures by knowledgeable decision makers”, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 17.
-
(2005)
Behavioral Research in Accounting
, vol.17
-
-
Dilla, W.N.1
Steinbart, P.J.2
-
4
-
-
0033420813
-
Performance evaluation judgements: effects of prior experience under different performance evaluation schemes and feedback frequencies
-
Frederickson, J.R., Peffer, S.A. and Pratt, J. (1999), “Performance evaluation judgements: effects of prior experience under different performance evaluation schemes and feedback frequencies”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 37 No. 1, Spring.
-
(1999)
Journal of Accounting Research
, vol.37
, Issue.1
, pp. Spring
-
-
Frederickson, J.R.1
Peffer, S.A.2
Pratt, J.3
-
5
-
-
0042074498
-
Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures; evidence from a Balanced Scorecard
-
Ittner, C.D., Larcker, D.F. and Meyer, M.W. (2003), “Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures; evidence from a Balanced Scorecard”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 78 No. 3.
-
(2003)
The Accounting Review
, vol.78
, Issue.3
-
-
Ittner, C.D.1
Larcker, D.F.2
Meyer, M.W.3
-
6
-
-
0026494564
-
The Balanced Scorecard – measures that drive performance
-
January-February
-
Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1992), “The Balanced Scorecard – measures that drive performance”, Harvard Business Review, January-February.
-
(1992)
Harvard Business Review
-
-
Kaplan, R.S.1
Norton, D.P.2
-
7
-
-
84993074358
-
Using the Balanced Scorecard as a strategic management system
-
January-February
-
Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996), “Using the Balanced Scorecard as a strategic management system”, Harvard Business Review, January-February.
-
(1996)
Harvard Business Review
-
-
Kaplan, R.S.1
Norton, D.P.2
-
8
-
-
0034337004
-
The Balanced Scorecard; judgemental effects of common and unique performance measures
-
Lipe, M.G. and Salterio, S.E. (2000), “The Balanced Scorecard; judgemental effects of common and unique performance measures”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 75 No. 3.
-
(2000)
The Accounting Review
, vol.75
, Issue.3
-
-
Lipe, M.G.1
Salterio, S.E.2
-
9
-
-
29544446403
-
Prioritising performance measures within the Balanced Scorecard
-
Reisinger, H., Cravens, K.S. and Tell, N. (2003), “Prioritising performance measures within the Balanced Scorecard”, Management International Review, Vol. 43 No. 4.
-
(2003)
Management International Review
, vol.43
, Issue.4
-
-
Reisinger, H.1
Cravens, K.S.2
Tell, N.3
-
10
-
-
33645940633
-
Debiasing Balanced Scorecard evaluations
-
Roberts, M.L., Albright, T.L. and Hibbets, A.R. (2004), “Debiasing Balanced Scorecard evaluations”, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 16.
-
(2004)
Behavioral Research in Accounting
, vol.16
-
-
Roberts, M.L.1
Albright, T.L.2
Hibbets, A.R.3
-
11
-
-
0002760518
-
How high is your return on management?
-
January-February
-
Simons, R. and Davila, A. (1998), “How high is your return on management?”, Harvard Business Review, January-February.
-
(1998)
Harvard Business Review
-
-
Simons, R.1
Davila, A.2
|