Amicus curiae briefs: The court’s perspective

Justice System Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 180-190

  Flango, Victor E ^a   Bross, Donald C ^a   Corbally, Sarah ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947418569     PISSN: 0098261X     EISSN: 23277556     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0098261X.2006.10767799     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. xzBradley, R. C., and P. Gardner (1985). “Underdogs, Upperdogs, and the Use of the Amicus Brief: Trends and Explanations,” 10 Justice System Journal 78
2. Caldeira, G. A., and J. R. Wright (1988). “Organized Interests and Agenda-Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court,” 82 American Political Science Review 1109
3. Coleman, G. S. (2003). “Amicus Curiae Briefs.” Seventeenth Annual Advanced Civil Appellate Practice Course, September 11-12, Austin, Texas
4. Collins, P. M., Jr. (2004). “Friends of the Court: Examining the Influence of Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation,” 38 Law and Society Review 807
5. Comparato, S. (2003). Amici Curiae and Strategic Behavior in State Supreme Courts. Westport, CT: Praeger
6. Corbally, S. F., and D. C. Bross (2001). “A Practical Guide for Filing Amicus Curiae Briefs in State Appellate Courts.” National Association of Council for Children Web site. http://www.naccchildlaw.org/documents/amicuspracticalguide.pdf
7. Corbally, S. F., D. C. Bross, and V. E. Flango (2004). “Filing of Amicus Curiae Briefs in State Courts of Last Resort: 1960-2000,” 25 Justice System Journal 39
8. Ennis, B. J. (1984). “Effective Amicus Briefs,” 33 Catholic University Law Review 603
9. Epstein, L. (1994). “Exploring the Participation of Organized Interests in Supreme Court Litigation,” Political Research Quarterly 335
10. Epstein, L. (1993). “Interest Group Litigation During the Rehnquist Court Era,” 9 Journal of Law and Politics 639
11. Epstein, L., and J. Knight (1999). “Mapping Out the Strategies Terrain: The Informational Role of Amici Curiae.” In H. Gillman and C. W. Clayton (eds.), Supreme Court Decision Making: New Institutional Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
12. Kaye, J. S. (1989). “One Judge’s View of ‘Friends of the Court,’” 61 New York State Bar Journal 8
13. Kearney, J. D., and T. W. Merrill (2000). “The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on the Supreme Court,” 148 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 743
14. Krislov, S. (1963). “The Amicus Curiae Brief: From Friendship to Advocacy,” 72 Yale Law Journal 694
15. Munford, L. T. (1999). “When Does the Curiae Need an Amicus?” 1 Journal of Appellate Practice and Process 279
16. O’Connor, K., and L. Epstein (1981-82). “Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation: An Appraisal of Hakman’s ‘Folklore,’” 16 Law and Society Review 311
17. Rustad, M., and T. Koenig (1993). “The Supreme Court and Junk Social Science: Selective Distortion in Amicus Briefs,” 72 North Carolina Law Review 91
18. Smith, P. M. (1998). “The Sometimes Troubled Relationship Between Courts and Their ‘Friends,’” 24 Litigation 24
19. Spriggs, J. F., and P. J. Wahlbeck (1997). “Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court,” 50 Political Research Quarterly 365