Amici Curiae and Strategic Behavior in State Supreme Courts

Amici Curiae and Strategic Behavior in State Supreme Courts

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-178

  Comparato, Scott A ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750478884     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (216)

1. Abrahamson, Shirley S., and Diane S. Gutman. 1987. “The New Judicial Federalism.” Judicature 71: 88-99.
2. Ainsworth, Scott, and Itai Sened. 1993. “The Role of Lobbyists: Entrepreneurs with Two Audiences.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 834-66.
3. Aldrich, Howard E., Catherine R. Zimmer, Udo H. Staber, and John J. Beggs. 1994. “Minimalism, Mutualism, and Maturity: The Evolution of the American Trade Association Population in the Twentieth Century.” In Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations, eds. Joel A.C. Baum and Jitendra V. Singh, 223-238. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Armstrong, Virginia, and Charles A. Johnson. “Certiorari Decision Making by the Warren and Burger Courts: Is Cue Theory Time Bound?" Polity 15 (1982):141-50.
5. Arnold, Douglas R. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.
6. Aspin, Larry T. 1999. “Trends in Judicial Retention Elections, 1964-1998.” Judicature 83(2): 79-81.
7. Aspin, Larry T., and William K. Hall. 1994. “Retention Elections and Judicial Behavior.” Judicature 77(6): 306-15.
8. Austen-Smith, David. 1993. “Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 799-833.
9. Austen-Smith, David, and John R. Wright. 1992. “Competitive Lobbying for a Legislator’s Vote.” Social Choice and Welfare 9: 229-57.
10. Austen-Smith, David, and John R. Wright. 1994. “Counteractive Lobbying.” American Journal of Political Science 38:25-44.
11. Austen-Smith, David, and John R. Wright. 1996. “Theory and Evidence for Counteractive Lobbying.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 543-64.
12. Barker, Lucius. 1967. “Third Parties in Litigation: ASystematic View of the Judicial Function.” Journal of Politics 29: 41-69.
13. Bass, Jack, and Walter DeVries. 1976. The Transformation of Southern Politics: Social Change and Political Consequences Since 1945. New York: Basic Books.
14. Bauer, Raymond, Ithiel de Sola Pool, and Anthony Lewis Dexter. 1963. American Business and Public Policy. New York: Atherton.
15. Baum, Lawrence. 1983. “The Electoral Fates of Incumbent Judges in the Ohio Court of Common Pleas.” Judicature 66: 42-50.
16. Baum, Lawrence. 1994. American Courts. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17. Baum, Lawrence. 1994. “What Judges Want: Judges’ Goals and Judicial Behavior.” Political Research Quarterly 47: 749-68.
18. Baum, Lawrence. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 1996. “The Multiple Ambiguities of ‘Counteractive Lobbying.'" American Journal of Political Science 40: 521-42.
20. Bentley, Arthur. [1908] 1967. The Process of Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
21. Berry, Jeffrey M. 1977. Lobbying for the People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Berry, Jeffrey M. 1997. The Interest Group Society, 3rd. ed. New York: Longman.
23. Berry, William D., Evan J. Ringquist, Richard C. Fording, and Russell L. Hanson. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 327-48.
24. Birnbaum, Jeffrey. 1992. The Lobbyists. New York: Times Books.
25. Black, Earl, and Merle Black. 1987. Politics and Society in the South. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
26. Botsch, Robert E. 1992. “South Carolina: The Rise of the New South.” In Interest Group Politics in the Southern States, eds. Ronald J. Hrebenar and Clive S. Thomas, 209-30. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
27. Brace, Paul, and Melinda Gann-Hall. 1990. “Neo-Institutionalism and Dissent in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Politics 52: 54-70.
28. Brace, Paul, and Melinda Gann-Hall. 1995. “Studying Courts Comparatively: The View from The American States.” Political Research Quarterly 48: 5-29.
29. Brace, Paul, and Melinda Gann-Hall. 1997. “The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in the Politics of Judicial Choice.” Journal of Politics 59: 1206-31.
30. Brace, Paul, Laura Langer, and Melinda Gann-Hall. 2000. “Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges.” Journal of Politics 62 (May): 387-413.
31. Brace, Paul, and John A. Straayer. 1987. “Colorado: PACs, Political Candidates, and Conservatism.” In Interest Group Politics in the American West, eds. Ronald J. Hrebenar and Clive S. Thomas. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
32. Brennan, William J. 1977. “State Constitutions and the Protection of Individual Rights.” Harvard Law Review 3: 489-504.
33. Brent, James. 1998. “State Senate Confirmations of Nominees to State Courts of Last Resort, 1980-1998.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Los Angeles, CA.
34. Browne, William P. 1985. “Variations in the Behavior and Style of State Lobbyists and Interest Groups.” Journal of Politics 47 (2):450-68.
35. Browne, William P. 1990. “Organized Interests and their Issue Niches: ASearch for Pluralism in a Policy Domain.” Journal of Politics 52(2): 477-509.
36. Browne, William P., and Delbert J. Ringquist. 1993. “Michigan: Diversity and Professionalism.” In Interest Group Politics in the Midwestern States, eds. Ronald J. Hrebenar and Clive S. Thomas. Ames: Iowa University Press.
37. Caldeira, Gregory A. 1983. “On the Reputation of State Supreme Courts.” Political Behavior 5: 83-108.
38. Caldeira, Gregory A. 1985. “The Transmission of Legal Precedent: A Study of State Supreme Courts.” American Political Science Review 79: 178-93.
39. Caldeira, Gregory A., and John R. Wright. 1988. “Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 82: 1109-27.
40. Caldeira, Gregory A., and John R. Wright. 1990a. “The Discuss List: Organized Interests and Agenda-Setting.” Law and Society Review 24: 807-36.
41. Caldeira, Gregory A., and John R. Wright. 1990b. “Amici Curiae Before the Supreme Court: Who Participates, When, and How Much?" Journal of Politics 52: 782-806.
42. Caldeira, Gregory A., John R. Wright, and Christopher Zorn. 1999. “Strategic Voting and Gatekeeping in the Supreme Court.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15(3): 549-72.
43. Cameron, Charles M., Albert D. Cover, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 1990. “Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neo-Institutional Model.” American Political Science Review 84: 525-34.
44. Carbon, Susan B. 1980. “Judicial Retention Elections: Are They Serving Their Intended Purpose?" Judicature 64(5): 210-33.
45. Carter v. South Carolina Coastal Council (304 S.E. 2d 327, 1986).
46. Cigler, Allan J., and Dwight Kiel. 1993. “Kansas: Representation in Transition.” In Interest Group Politics in the Midwestern States, eds. Ronald J. Hrebenar and Clive S. Thomas. Ames: Iowa University Press.
47. Clausen, Aage R. 1973. How Congressmen Decide: A Policy Focus. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
48. Cohen, Linda R., and Matthew L. Spitzer. 1994. “Solving the Chevron Puzzle.” Law and Contemporary Problems 57 (Spring): 65-110.
49. Cohen, Mark A. 1992. “The Motives of Judges: Empirical Evidence from Antitrust Sentencing.” International Review of Law and Economics 12: 13-30.
50. Cook, Beverly B. 1979. “Sentencing Problems and Internal Court Reform.” In The Study of Criminal Courts: Political Perspectives, ed. Peter F. Nardulli, 227-71. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing Co.
51. Cronin, Thomas. 1989. Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum and Recall. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
52. Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. de Tocqueville, Alexis. 1956. Democracy in America, ed. Richard D. Heffner. New York: Penguin.
54. Dolbeare, Kenneth M. 1967. Trial Courts in Urban Politics: State Court Policy Impact and Functions in a Local Political System. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
55. Dubois, Philip L. 1980. From Bench to Ballot: Judicial Elections and the Quest for Accountability. Austin: University of Texas Press.
56. Elder, Harold W. 1987. “Property Rights Structures and Criminal Courts: An Analysis of State Criminal Courts.” International Review of Law and Economics 7 (June): 21-32.
57. Ennis, Bruce J. 1984. “Effective Amicus Briefs.” Catholic University Law Review 33:603-609.
58. Epstein, Lee. 1985. Conservatives in Court. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
59. Epstein, Lee. 1991. “Courts and Interest Groups.” In The American Courts: A Critical Assessment, eds. John B. Gates and Charles A. Johnson. Washington, D.C.:CQ Press.
60. Epstein, Lee. 1993. “Interest Group Litigation During the Rehnquist Court.” Journal of Law & Politics 9 (Summer): 639-717.
61. Epstein, Lee. 1994. “Exploring the Participation of Organized Interests in State Court Litigation.” Political Research Quarterly 47: 335-52.
62. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington: CQ Press.
63. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1999. “Mapping Out the Strategic Terrain: The Informational Role of Amici Curiae.” In Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutional Approaches, eds. Howard Gillman and Cornell W. Clayton. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Epstein, Lee, and Joseph Kobylka. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
65. Epstein, Lee, and Carol Mershon. 1996. “Measuring Political Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 261-94.
66. Epstein, Lee, and C.K. Rowland. 1991. “Debunking the Myth of Interest Group Invincibility.” American Political Science Review 85: 205-12.
67. Epstein, Lee, Jeffrey Segal, and Timothy Johnson. 1996. “The Claim of Issue Creation on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 34 (4):845-52.
68. Epstein, Lee, Jeffrey A. Segal, Harold J. Spaeth, and Thomas G. Walker. 1998. The Supreme Court Compendium. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
69. Epstein, Lee, and Thomas G. Walker. 1995. “The Role of the Supreme Court in American Society: Playing the Reconstruction Game.” In Contemplating Courts, ed. Lee Epstein. Washington, D.C: CQ Press.
70. Eskridge, William N. Jr. 1991a. “Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions.” Yale Law Journal 101: 331-417.
71. Eskridge, William N. Jr. 1991b. “Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game.” California Law Review 79: 613-84.
72. Eskridge, William N. Jr., and John Ferejohn. 1992. “The Article I, Section 7 Game.” Georgetown Law Journal 80 (February): 523-64.
73. The Federalist. 1901. New York: M. Walter Dunne Publishers.
74. Fenno, Richard. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
75. Ferejohn, John, and Barry Weingast. 1992. “The Limitation of Statutes: Strategic Statutory Interpretation.” Georgetown Law Journal 80: 565-82.
76. Fino, Susan P. 1987. The Role of State Supreme Courts in the New Judicial Federalism. New York: Greenwood Press.
77. Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
78. Flango, Victor Eugene, and Craig R. Ducat. 1979. “What Difference Does Method of Judicial Selection Make?" Justice System Journal 5: 25-44.
79. Flemming, Roy B. 1982. Punishment Before Trial: An Organizational Perspective of Felony Bail Processes. New York: Longman.
80. Frank, Jerome. 1930. Law and the Modern Mind. New York: Coward-McCann.
81. Galanter, Marc, Frank S. Palen, and John M. Thomas. 1979. “The Crusading Judge:Judicial Activism in Trial Courts.” Southern California Law Review 52:699-741.
82. Gely, Rafael, and Pablo Spiller. 1990. “A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Statutory Decisions with Applications to the State Farm& Grove City Cases.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 6: 263-300.
83. Gely, Rafael, and Pablo Spiller. 1992. “The Political Economy of Supreme Court Constitutional Decisions:The Case of Roosevelt’s Court Packing Plan.” International Review of Law and Economics 12: 45-67.
84. Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1996. “Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science 40(1): 99-128.
85. Gibson, James L. 1978. “Judges’ Role Orientations, Attitudes, and Decisions: An Interactive Model.” American Political Science Review 72: 911-24.
86. Gibson, James L. 1980. “Environmental Constraints on the Behavior of Judges: A Representational Model of Judicial Decision Making.” Law and Society Review 14:343-70.
87. Giles, Michael W., and Thomas G. Walker. 1975. “Judicial Policy-Making and Southern School Segregation.” Journal of Politics 37 (November): 917-36.
88. Glick, Henry R. 1971. Supreme Courts in State Politics. New York: Basic Books.
89. Glick, Henry R., and Craig Emmert. 1987. “Selection Systems and Judicial Characteristics:The Recruitment of State Supreme Court Judges,” Judicature 70: 4.
90. Glick, Henry R., and Kenneth N. Vines. 1973. State Court Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
91. Goldman, Sheldon. 1975. “Voting Behavior on U.S. Courts of Appeals Revisited.” American Political Science Review 69: 491-506.
92. Greene, William H. 2002. Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
93. Griffin, Kenyon N., and Michael J. Horan. 1979. “Merit Retention Elections: What Influences the Voters?" Judicature 63(2): 78-88.
94. Hakman, Nathan. 1969. “Lobbying the Supreme Court: An Appraisal of Political Science Folklore.” Fordham Law Review 35: 15-50.
95. Hall, Melinda Gann. 1987. “Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study.” The Journal of Politics 49: 1117-24.
96. Hall, Melinda Gann. 1992. “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Politics 54: 427-46.
97. Hall, Melinda Gann. 1995. “Justices as Representatives: Elections and Judicial Politics in the American States.” American Politics Quarterly 23: 485-503.
98. Hall, Melinda Gann. 2001a. “State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform.” American Political Science Review 95(2): 315-30.
99. Hall, Melinda Gann. 2001b. “Voluntary Retirements from State Supreme Courts: Assessing Democratic Pressures to Relinquish the Bench.” Journal of Politics 63 (4):1112-40.
100. Hall, Melinda Gann, and Paul Brace. 1989. “Order in the Courts: ANeo-Institutional Approach to Judicial Consensus.” Western Political Quarterly 42: 391-407.
101. Hall, Melinda Gann, and Paul Brace. 1992. “Toward an Integrated Model of Judicial Voting Behavior.” American Politics Quarterly 20: 147-68.
102. Hall, Melinda Gann, and Paul Brace. 1994. “The Vicissitudes of Death by Decree: Forces Influencing Capital Punishment Decision Making in State Supreme Courts.” Social Science Quarterly 75: 136-51.
103. Hall, Melinda Gann, and Paul Brace. 1996. “Justices’ Response to Case Facts: An Interactive Model.” American Politics Quarterly 24(2): 237-62.
104. Hall, Melinda Gann, and Paul Brace. 1999. “State Supreme Courts and Their Environments: Avenues to General Theories of Judicial Choice.” In Institutional Approaches to Supreme Court Decision Making, eds. Cornell Clayton and Howard Gillman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
105. Hall, William, and Larry Aspin. 1987. “What Twenty Years of Judicial Retention Elections Have Taught Us.” Judicature 70: 340-47.
106. Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919-1981. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
107. Heclo, Hugh. 1978. “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment.” In The New American Political System, ed. Anthony King. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
108. Hedlund, Ronald D. 1993. “Wisconsin: Pressure Politics and a Lingering Progressive Tradition.” In Interest Group Politics in the Midwestern States, eds. Ronald J. Hrebenar and Clive S. Thomas. Ames: Iowa University Press.
109. Heinz, John P., Edward O. Laumann, Robert L. Nelson, and Robert H. Salisbury. 1993. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
110. Heumann, Milton. 1978. Plea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges and Defense Attorneys. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
111. Hoekstra, Valerie. 1997. “State Supreme Courts, Policy Making and Popular Initiatives.” Paper presented at the 1997 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
112. Holmes, Oliver Wendell. 1881. The Common Law. Boston: Little Brown.
113. Howard, J. Woodford. 1968. “On the Fluidity of Judicial Choice.” American Political Science Review 62: 43-56.
114. Hrebenar, Ronald J. 1993. “The Role of Interest Groups in Northeastern Politics.” In Interest Group Politics in the Northeastern States, eds. Ronald J. Hrebenar and Clive S. Thomas. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
115. Jacobson, Gary C. 1987. “The Marginals Never Vanished: Incumbency and Competition in Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952-1982.” American Journal of Political Science 31: 126-41.
116. Johnson, Timothy. 1998. Oral Advocacy and the Supreme Court. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
117. “Judicial Selection in the States: ACritical Study with Proposals for Reform.” 1976. Hofstra Law Review 4: 267-320.
118. Key, V.O. Jr. [1949] 1993. Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
119. Kingdon, John W. 1981. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. 2d. ed. New York: Harper & Row.
120. Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.
121. Knight, Jack, and Lee Epstein. 1996. “On the Struggle for Judicial Supremacy.” Law and Society Review 30: 87-120.
122. Krislov, Samuel. 1963. “The Amicus Curiae Brief: From Friendship to Advocacy.” Yale Law Journal 7: 694-721.
123. Kuklinski, James, and John Stanga. 1979. “Political Participation and Governmental Responsiveness: The Behavior of California Superior Courts.” American Political Science Review 73: 1090-99.
124. Langbein, Laura. 1986. “Money and Access: Some Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Politics 48: 1052-62.
125. Langer, Laura. 2002. Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. Albany: State University of New York Press.
126. Latzer, Barry. 1991. “The Hidden Conservatism of the State Court Revolution.” Judicature 74: 190-97.
127. Llewellyn, Karl. 1960. The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals. Boston: Little, Brown.
128. Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
129. Lutz, Donald. 1994. “Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment.” American Political Science Review 88: 355-70.
130. Magleby, David B. 1984. Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
131. Maltzman, Forrest, and Paul Wahlbeck. 1996. “Strategic Policy Considerations and Voting Fluidity on the Burger Court.” American Political Science Review 90 (September): 581-92.
132. Mann, Thomas E. 1978. Unsafe at Any Margin: Interpreting Congressional Elections. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
133. Marks, Brian A. 1989. A Model of Judicial Influence on Congressional Policymaking:Grove City College v. Bell. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
134. Martin, Andrew. 1998. Strategy, and The Separation of Powers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
135. Martin, David L. 1978. “PAC Money in State Legislative Elections: An Alabama Report.” Comparative State Politics Newsletter 8(4): 18-21.
136. Martin, David L. 1992. “Alabama: Personalities and Factionalism.” In Interest Group Politics in the Southern States, eds. Ronald J. Hrebenar and Clive S. Thomas. 249-67. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
137. Matsusaka, John G. 1995. “Fiscal Effects of the Voter Initiative: Evidence from the Last 30 Years.” Journal of Political Economy 103: 587-623.
138. Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, Conn.:Yale University Press.
139. Mayhew, David R. 1986. Placing Parties in American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
140. Maxwell, Robert S. 1956. La Follette and the Rise of the Progressives in Wisconsin. Madison: State Historical Society of Wisconsin.
141. McCubbins, Matthew D., Roger G. Noll, and Barry R. Weingast. 1992. “Positive Canons: The Role of Legislative Bargains in Statutory Interpretation,” Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 809 (February): 705-742.
142. McGuire, Kevin T., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 1993. “Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity: Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 87: 717-26.
143. McGuire, Kevin, and Barbara Palmer. 1995. “Issue Fluidity on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 691-702.
144. Milbrath, Lester. 1960. “Lobbying as a Communication Process.” Public Opinion Quarterly 24: 32-53.
145. Moe, Terry. 1980. The Organization of Interests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
146. Morehouse, Sarah McCally. 1981. State Politics, Parties and Policy. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
147. Murphy, Walter. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
148. Neubauer, David W. 1974. Criminal Justice in Middle America. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
149. Neustadt, Richard E. 1990. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. New York: Free Press.
150. O’Connor, Karen. 1980. Women’s Organizations’ Use of the Courts. Lexington, Mass.:Lexington Books.
151. O’Connor, Karen, and Lee Epstein. 1981-82. “Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation: An Analysis of Hakman’s ‘Folklore.'" Law and Society Review 16: 312-20.
152. O’Connor, Karen, and Lee Epstein. 1983. “The Rise of Conservative Interest Group Litigation.” Journal of Politics 45: 479-89.
153. O’Connor, Karen, and Lee Epstein. 1989. Public Interest Law Groups. New York: Greenwood Press.
154. O’Connor, Karen, and Bryant Scott McFall. 1992. “Conservative Interest Group Litigation in the Reagan Era and Beyond.” In The Politics of Interests: Interest Groups Transformed, ed. Mark P. Petracca. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
155. Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
156. Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
157. Peirce, Neal R. 1972. The Deep South States of America. New York: W.W. Norton.
158. Peirce, Neal R. 1972. The Mountain States of America. New York: W.W. Norton.
159. Peirce, Neal R. 1973. The Great Plains States of America. New York: W.W. Norton.
160. Peirce, Neal R., and Jerry Hagstrom. 1983. The Book of America: Inside 50 States Today. New York: W.W. Norton.
161. Perry, H.W. Jr. 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
162. Petracca, Mark. 1992. “The Rediscovery of Interest Group Politics.” In The Politics of Interests: Interest Groups Transformed, ed. Mark P. Petracca. Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
163. Polsby, Nelson W. 1964. Congress and the Presidency. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
164. Price, Charles M. 1980. “The Initiative: AComparative State Analysis and Reassessment of a Western Phenomenon.” Western Political Quarterly 28: 243-62.
165. Pritchett, C. Herman. 1948. The Roosevelt Court. New York: MacMillan.
166. Rohde, David W., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: W.H. Freedman.
167. Rosenberg, Gerald. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
168. Rosenthol, Alan, and Maureen Moakley. 1984. The Political Life of the American States. New York: Praeger.
169. Salisbury, Robert H. 1969. “An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 3:1-32.
170. Salisbury, Robert H. 1975. “Interest Groups.” In Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 4, eds. I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
171. Salisbury, Robert H. 1984. “Interest Representation: The Dominance of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 78: 64-76.
172. Salisbury, Robert H. 1990. “The Paradox of Interest Groups in Washington, DC: More Groups and Less Clout.” In The New American Political System, 2d version, ed. Anthony S. King. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
173. Salmore, Barbara G., and Stephen A. Salmore. 1993. “New Jersey: From Political Hacks to Political Action Committees.” In Interest Group Politics in the Northeastern States, eds. Ronald J. Hrebenar and Clive S. Thomas. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
174. Schlozman, Kay Lehmann, and John Tierney. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
175. Schmidhauser, John R. 1964. “The Background Characteristics of United States Supreme Court Justices.” In Judicial Behavior: A Reader in Theory and Research, ed. Glendon Schubert. Chicago: Rand McNally.
176. Schubert, Glendon. 1958. “The Study of Judicial Decision-Making as an Aspect of Political Behavior.” American Political Science Review 52:1007-25.
177. Schubert, Glendon. 1965. The Judicial Mind: The Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946-1963. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
178. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1997. “Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and the Courts.” American Political Science Review 91:28-44.
179. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Albert Cover. 1989. “Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices.” American Political Science Review 83: 557-65.
180. Segal, Jeffrey A., Donald R. Songer, and Charles M. Cameron. 1994. “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 673-96.
181. Segal, Jeffrey A., Donald R. Songer, and Charles M. Cameron. 1995. “Decision Making on the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” In Contemplating Courts, ed. Lee Epstein. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
182. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
183. Sheldon, Charles, and Linda Maule. 1997. Choosing Justice: The Recruitment of State and Federal Judges. Pullman: Washington State University Press.
184. Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Mark Bonchek. 1997. Analyzing Politics. New York: Norton.
185. Songer, Donald R. 1979. “Concern for Policy Outputs as a Cue for Supreme Court Decisions on Certiorari.” Journal of Politics 41:1185-94.
186. Songer, Donald R. 1990. “An Overview of Judicial Policymaking in the United States Courts of Appeals.” In The American Courts: A Critical Assessment, eds. John B. Gates and Charles A. Johnson. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
187. Songer, Donald R., and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1993. “Interest group success in the courts: Amicus participation in the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 46(2): 339-55.
188. Songer, Donald R., and Susan J. Tabrizi. 1999. “The Religious Right in Court: The Decision Making of Christian Evangelicals in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Politics 61(2): 507-26.
189. Sorauf, Frank J. 1976. The Wall of Separation: Constitutional Politics of Church and State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
190. Spiller, Pablo T., and Rafael Gely. 1992. “Congressional Control or Judicial Independence:The Determinants of U.S. Supreme Court Labor Relations Decisions, 1949-1988.” RAND Journal of Economics 23:463-92.
191. Spiller, Pablo T., and Richard G. VandenBergh. 1997. “A Positive Theory of State Supreme Court Decision Making.” Paper presented at the 1997 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
192. Spriggs, James F. II, Forrest Maltzman, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 1999. “Bargaining on the U.S. Supreme Court: Justices: Responses to Majority Opinion Drafts.” Journal of Politics 61 (May): 485-506.
193. Spriggs, James F. II, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 1997. “Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 50: 365-86.
194. State v. Gerhardstein (416 N.W. 2d 883, 1987).
195. Sullivan, Richard. 1986. “Environmental Policy.” In The Political State of New Jersey ed. Gerald Pomper. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
196. Tarr, G. Alan, and Mary Cornelia Aldis Porter. 1982. “Gender Equality and Judicial Federalism: The Role of State Appellate Courts.” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 9: 919.
197. Tarr, G. Alan, and Mary Cornelia Aldis Porter. 1988. State Supreme Courts in State and Nation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
198. Thomas, Clive S. 1992. “Understanding Interest Group Activity.” In Interest Group Politics in the Southern States, eds. Ronald J. Hrebenar and Clive S. Thomas. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
199. Thomas, James D., and William H. Stewart. 1988. Alabama Government and Politics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
200. Truman, David B. 1951. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Knopf.
201. Vose, Clement E. 1959. Caucasians Only. Berkeley: University of California Press.
202. Vose, Clement E. 1972. Constitutional Change. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
203. Wahlbeck, Paul J. 1997. “The Life of the Law: Judicial Politics and Legal Change.” Journal of Politics 59 (August): 778-802.
204. Wahlbeck, Paul J., James F. Spriggs II, and Forrest Maltzman. 1998. “Marshalling the Court: Bargaining and Accommodation on the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (January): 294-315.
205. Walker, Jack L. 1983. “The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America.” American Political Science Review 77: 390-406.
206. Walker, Jack L. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professionals, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
207. Wasby, Stephen L. 1984. “How Planned is ‘Planned Litigation’?" 1984 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 83-138.
208. Watson, Richard A., and Ronald G. Downing. 1969. The Politics of Bench and Bar:Judicial Selection under the Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan. New York: Wiley.
209. Weissman, Dan. “Fourth Branch of Government: Lobbyists Play Pivotal Role in Legislative Action.” Newark Star Ledger, March 22, 1987.
210. Wilson, James Q. 1973. Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books.
211. Wolbrecht, Christina. 1994. “Separation of Powers, Constitutional Interpretation, and the Free Exercise of Religion: A Formal Model.” Washington University Political Science Working Paper.
212. Wold, John T., and John H. Culver. 1987. “The Defeat of the California Justices: The Campaign, the Electorate, and the Issue of Judicial Accountability.” Judicature 70: 348-55.
213. Wright, John R. 1996. Interest Groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions, and Influence. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
214. Zeigler, L. Harmon. 1983. “Interest Groups in the States.” In Politics in the American States. 4th ed., eds. Virginia Gray, Herbert Jacob, and Kenneth Vines. Boston: Little, Brown.
215. Zeigler, L. Harmon, and Michael Baer. 1969. Lobbying: Interaction and Influence in American State Legislatures. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
216. Zeller, Belle. 1954. American State Legislatures. 2d ed. New York: Thomas Crowell.