메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 39-56

Filing of amicus curiae briefs in state courts of last resort: 1960-2000

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 26044476412     PISSN: 0098261X     EISSN: 23277556     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0098261X.2004.10767707     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (15)

References (24)
  • 1
    • 24944580561 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • New Perspectives for the Comparative Study of the Judiciary: The State Supreme Court Project
    • BRACE, P., and K. S. BUTLER (2001). “ New Perspectives for the Comparative Study of the Judiciary: The State Supreme Court Project,” 22 Justice System Journal 243
    • (2001) Justice System Journal , vol.22 , pp. 243
    • Brace, P.1    Butler, K.S.2
  • 2
    • 0035527874 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Haves Versus ‘Have Nots’ in State Supreme Courts: Allocating Docket Space and Wins in Power Asymmetric Cases
    • BRACE, P., and M. G. HALL (2001). “‘Haves’ Versus ‘Have Nots’ in State Supreme Courts: Allocating Docket Space and Wins in Power Asymmetric Cases,” 35 Law and Society Review 393
    • (2001) Law and Society Review , vol.35 , pp. 393
    • Brace, P.1    Hall, M.G.2
  • 3
    • 10844245124 scopus 로고
    • Underdogs, Upperdogs, and the Use of the Amicus Brief: Trends and Explanations
    • BRADLEY, R. C., and P. GARDNER (1985). “Underdogs, Upperdogs, and the Use of the Amicus Brief: Trends and Explanations,” 10 Justice System Journal 78
    • (1985) Justice System Journal , vol.10 , pp. 78
    • Bradley, R.C.1    Gardner, P.2
  • 4
    • 84934564270 scopus 로고
    • Organized Interests and Agenda-Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court
    • CALDEIRA, G. A., and J. R. WRIGHT (1988). “Organized Interests and Agenda-Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court,” 82 American Political Science Review 1109
    • (1988) American Political Science Review , vol.82 , pp. 1109
    • Caldeira, G.A.1    Wright, J.R.2
  • 5
    • 85010621448 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What to Say and Where to Say It? Evaluating the Importance of the Institutional Structure on the Content of Amicus Briefs
    • Chicago
    • COMPARATO, S. (2000). “What to Say and Where to Say It? Evaluating the Importance of the Institutional Structure on the Content of Amicus Briefs.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 27-30, Chicago
    • (2000) Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April , pp. 27-30
    • Comparato, S.1
  • 6
    • 84970306283 scopus 로고
    • Exploring the Participation of Organized Interests in Supreme Court Litigation
    • EPSTEIN, L. (1994). “Exploring the Participation of Organized Interests in Supreme Court Litigation,” Political Research Quarterly 335
    • (1994) Political Research Quarterly , pp. 335
    • Epstein, L.1
  • 7
    • 0001626599 scopus 로고
    • Courts and Interest Groups
    • In J. B. Gates and C. A. Johnson (eds.), Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc
    • (1991). “Courts and Interest Groups.” In J. B. Gates and C. A. Johnson (eds.), The American Courts: A Critical Assessment. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc
    • (1991) The American Courts: A Critical Assessment
  • 8
    • 0010219754 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mapping Out the Strategies Terrain: The Informational Role of Amici Curiae
    • In H. Gillman and C. W. Clayton (eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press
    • EPSTEIN, L., and J. KNIGHT (1999). “Mapping Out the Strategies Terrain: The Informational Role of Amici Curiae.” In H. Gillman and C. W. Clayton (eds.), Supreme Court Decision Making: New Institutional Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
    • (1999) Supreme Court Decision Making: New Institutional Approaches
    • Epstein, L.1    Knight, J.2
  • 9
    • 26044476807 scopus 로고
    • Lobbying the Supreme Court—An Appraisal of ‘Political Science Folklore
    • HAKMAN, N. (1966). “Lobbying the Supreme Court—An Appraisal of ‘Political Science Folklore,’” 35 Fordham Law Review 15
    • (1966) Fordham Law Review , vol.35 , pp. 15
    • Hakman, N.1
  • 12
    • 26044434272 scopus 로고
    • The Role of the Attorney General as Amicus Curiae
    • In L. A. Huston et al., Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute
    • KRISLOV, S. (1968). “The Role of the Attorney General as Amicus Curiae.” In L. A. Huston et al., The Role of Attorney General of the United States. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute
    • (1968) The Role of Attorney General of the United States
    • Krislov, S.1
  • 13
    • 0009085701 scopus 로고
    • The Amicus Brief: From Friendship to Advocacy
    • (1963). “The Amicus Brief: From Friendship to Advocacy,” 72 Yale Law Journal 694
    • (1963) Yale Law Journal , vol.72 , pp. 694
  • 14
    • 0000643890 scopus 로고
    • Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity: Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court
    • MCGUIRE, K. T., and G. A. CALDEIRA (1993). “Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity: Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court,” 89 American Political Science Review 717
    • (1993) American Political Science Review , vol.89 , pp. 717
    • McGuire, K.T.1    Caldeira, G.A.2
  • 15
    • 85010621467 scopus 로고
    • State Supreme Court Litigants and Their Disputes: The Impact of Socioeconomic Development from 1870 to 1970
    • MEEKER, J. W. (1986). State Supreme Court Litigants and Their Disputes: The Impact of Socioeconomic Development from 1870 to 1970. New York: Garland Publishing
    • (1986) New York: Garland Publishing
    • Meeker, J.W.1
  • 16
    • 0010213489 scopus 로고
    • Government Litigation in the Supreme Court: The Roles of the Solicitor General
    • NOTE (1969). “Government Litigation in the Supreme Court: The Roles of the Solicitor General,” 83 Yale Law Journal 1442
    • (1969) Yale Law Journal , vol.83 , pp. 1442
  • 17
    • 26044452874 scopus 로고
    • Conservative Interest Group Litigation in the Reagan Era and Beyond
    • In M. P. Petracca (ed.), Boulder, CO: Westview Press
    • O’CONNOR, K., and B. S. MCFALL (1992). “Conservative Interest Group Litigation in the Reagan Era and Beyond.” In M. P. Petracca (ed.), The Politics of Interest: Interest Groups Transformed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
    • (1992) The Politics of Interest: Interest Groups Transformed
    • O’Connor, K.1    McFall, B.S.2
  • 18
    • 0040685569 scopus 로고
    • Court Rules and Workload: A Case Study of Rules Governing Amicus Curiae Participation
    • O’CONNOR, K., and L. EPSTEIN (1983). “Court Rules and Workload: A Case Study of Rules Governing Amicus Curiae Participation,” 8 Justice System Journal 35
    • (1983) Justice System Journal , vol.8 , pp. 35
    • O’Connor, K.1    Epstein, L.2
  • 19
    • 84925928818 scopus 로고
    • Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation: An Appraisal of Hakmans ‘Folklore,’”
    • (1981-82). “Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation: An Appraisal of Hakman’s ‘Folklore,’” 16 Law and Society Review 311
    • (1981) Law and Society Review , vol.16 , pp. 311
  • 20
  • 22
    • 85010558174 scopus 로고
    • The American Judicial Process: Models and Approaches. New York: Dodd
    • SHELDON, C. H. (1971). The American Judicial Process: Models and Approaches. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company
    • (1971) Mead and Company
    • Sheldon, C.H.1
  • 24
    • 0003429563 scopus 로고
    • Berkeley: University of California Press
    • VOSE, C. (1959). Caucasians Only. Berkeley: University of California Press
    • (1959) Caucasians Only
    • Vose, C.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.