Added noise affects the neural correlates of upright and inverted faces differently

Journal of Vision

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2007, Pages

  Schneider, Bethany L ^a   DeLong, Jordan E ^a   Busey, Thomas A ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Faces; Inversion; N170; Noise

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 33947408801     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.4.4     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Avidan, G., Harel, M., Hendler, T., Ben-Bashat, D., Zohary, E., & Malach, R. (2002). Contrast sensitivity in human visual areas and its relationship to object recognition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 3102-3116. [PubMed] [Article]
2. Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, A., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551-565.
3. Busey, T. A., & Vankerkolk, J. R. (2005). Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts. Vision Research, 45, 431-448. [PubMed]
4. Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1977). From piecemeal to configural representation of faces. Science, 195, 312-314. [PubMed]
5. Carey, S., Diamond, R., & Woods, B. (1980). The development of race recognition: A maturational component. Developmental Psychology, 16, 257-269.
6. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21. [PubMed]
7. Eimer, M. (2000). The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces. Neuroreport, 11, 2319-2324. [PubMed]
8. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is "special" about face perception? Psychological Review, 105, 298-482. [PubMed]
9. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 568-573. [PubMed] [Article]
10. Horovitz, S. G., Rossion, B., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (2004). Parametric design and correlational analyses help integrating fMRI and electrophysiological data during face processing. Neuroimage, 22, 1587-1595. [PubMed]
11. Itier, R. J., Latinus, M., & Taylor, M. J. (2006). Face, eye and object early processing: What is the face specificity? Neuroimage, 29, 667-676. [PubMed]
12. Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2004). Source analysis of the N170 to faces and objects. Neuroreport, 15, 1261-1265. (PubMed]
13. Jemel, B., Schuller, A. M., Cheref-Khan, Y., Goffaux, V., Crommelinck, M., & Bruyer, R. (2003). Stepwise emergence of the face-sensitive N170 event-related potential component. Neuroreport, 14, 2035-2039. [PubMed]
14. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 53, 513-536. [PubMed]
15. Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Palva, J. M., Sams, M., Hietanen, J. K., Aronen, H. J., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (1998). Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120 ms after stimulus onset revealed by magneto- and electroencephalography. Neuroscience Letters, 253, 147-150. [PubMed]
16. Maurer, D., Grand, R. L., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255-260. [PubMed]
17. Mazard, A., Schiltz, C., & Rossion, B. (2006). Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 44, 912-922. [PubMed]
18. McKone, E., Martini, P., & Nakayama, K. (2001). Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 573-599. [PubMed]
19. McKone, E., Martini, P., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Isolating holistic processing in faces (and perhaps objects). In M. A. Peterson & G. Rhodes (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes. Advances in visual cognition (vol. viii, pp. 92-117). London: Oxford University Press.
20. Perrett, D. I., Mistlin, A. J., Chitty, A. J., Smith, P. A., Potter, D. D., Broennimann, R., et al. (1988). Specialized face processing and hemispheric asymmetry in man and monkey: Evidence from single unit and reaction times studies. Behavioural Brain Research, 29, 245-258. [PubMed]
21. Perrett, D. I., Oram, M. W., & Ashbridge, E. (1998). Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: An account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations. Cognition, 67, 111-145. [PubMed]
22. Philips, R. J., & Rawles, R. E. (1979). Recognition of upright and inverted faces: A correlational study. Perception, 43, 39-56. [PubMed]
23. Riesenhuber, M., Jarudi, I., Gilad, S., & Sinha, P. (2004). Face processing humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 271, 448-450. [PubMed] [Article]
24. Rossion, B., & Gauthier, I. (2002). How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 1, 62-74.
25. Scapinello, K. F., & Yarmey, A. D. (1970). The role of familiarity and orientation in immediate and delayed recognition of pictorial stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 21, 329-331.
26. Sekuler, A. B., Gaspar, C. M., Gold, J. M., & Bennett, P. J. (2004). Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing. Current Biology, 14, 391-396. [PubMed] [Article]
27. Tanaka, J. W., & Curran, T. (2001). A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 43-47. [PubMed]
28. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 225-484. [PubMed]
29. Tanskanen, T., Näsänen, R., Montez, T., Päällysaho, J., & Hari, R. (2005). Face recognition and cortical responses show similar sensitivity to noise spatial frequency. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 526-534. [PubMed] [Article]
30. Tarkiainen, A., Cornelissen, P. L., & Salmelin, R. (2002). Dynamics of visual feature analysis and object-level processing in faces versus letter-string perception. Brain, 125, 1125-1136. [PubMed] [Article]
31. Taylor, M. J., Edmonds, G. E., McCarthy, G., & Allison, T. (2001). Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children. Neuroreport, 12, 1671-1676. [PubMed]
32. Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9, 483-484. [PubMed]
33. Tjan, B. S., Lestou, V., & Kourtzi, Z. (2006). Uncertainty and invariance in the human visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 1556-1568. [PubMed]
34. Watanabe, S., Kakigi, R., & Puce, A. (2003). The spatiotemporal dynamics of the face inversion effect: A magneto- and electro-encephalographic study. Neuroscience, 116, 879-895. [PubMed]
35. Wichmann, F. A., Braun, D. I., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2006). Phase noise and the classification of natural images. Vision Research, 46, 1520-1529. [PubMed]
36. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.
37. Yovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Face perception: Domain specific, not process specific. Neuron, 44, 889-898. [Pubmed] [Article].