Analysis of bud sport cultivars of peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) by simple sequence repeats (SSR) and restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS)

Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 20-27

  Mase, Nobuko ^a   Iketani, Hiroyuki ^a   Sato, Yoshihiko ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FRUIT TREE SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bud sport mutant; Noti; Peach; RLGS (restriction landmark genomic scanning); SSR (simple sequence repeats)

Indexed keywords

PRUNUS; PRUNUS PERSICA;

EID: 33947402232     PISSN: 18823351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2503/jjshs.76.20     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abe, T., T. Matsuyama, S. Sekido, I. Yamaguchi, S. Yoshida and T. Kameya. 2002. Chlorophyll-deficient mutants of rice demonstrated the deletion of a DNA fragment by heavy-ion irradiation. J. Radiat. Res. 43 (Suppl.): S157-S161.
2. Agarwal, S., A. K. Nath and D. R. Sharma. 2001. Characterization of peach (Prunus persica L.) cultivars using isozymes as molecular markers. Sci. Hort. 90: 227-242.
3. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 796-815.
4. Arulsekar, S., D. E. Parfitt and D. E. Kester. 1986. Comparison of isozyme variability in peach and almond cultivars. J. Hered. 77: 272-274.
5. Asakawa, J. 1996. High resolutional two-dimension electrophoresis of DNA: a refinement of RLGS method. Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso (Protein, Nucleic Acid and Enzyme) 41: 170-177 (In Japanese).
6. Dellaporta, S. L., J. Wood and J. B. Hicks. 1983. A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Reptr. 1(4): 19-21.
7. Delmotte, F., N. Leterme and J. C. Simon. 2001. Microsatellite allele sizing: difference between automated capillary electrophoresis and manual technique. BioTecniques 31: 810-818.
8. Dickson, E. E., K. Arumuganathan, S. Kresovich and J. J. Doyle. 1992. Nuclear DNA content variation within the Rosaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 79: 1081-1086.
9. Dirlewanger, E., P. Cosson, W. Howad, G. Capdeville, N. Bosselut, M. Claverie, R. Voisin, C. Poizat, B. Lafargue, O. Baron, F. Laigret, M. Kleinhentz, P. Arús and D. Esmenjaud. 2004. Microsatellite genetic linkage maps of myrobalan plum and an almond-peach hybrid - location of root-kont nematode resistance genes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 827-838.
10. Haberl, M. and D. Tautz. 1999. Comparative allele sizing can produce inacculate allele size differences for microsatellites. Mol.Ecol. 8: 1347-1350.
11. Haji, T., H. Yaegaki and M. Yamaguchi. 2005. Inheritance and expression of fruit texture melting, non-melting and stony hard in peach. Sci. Hort. 105: 241-248.
12. Hatada, I., Y. Hayashizaki, S. Hirotsune, H. Komatsubara and T. Mukai. 1991. A genomic scanning method for higher organisms using restriction site as landmarks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 9523-9527.
13. Hocquigny, S., F. Pelsy, V. Dumas, S. Kindt, M.-C. Heloir and D. Merdinoglu. 2004. Diversification within grapevine cultivars goes through chimeric status. Genome 47: 579-589.
14. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project. 2005. The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 436: 793-800.
15. Kawase, M. 1994. Application of the restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) method to rice cultivars as new fingerprinting technique. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 861-864.
16. Kobayashi, S., N. Goto-Yamamoto and H. Hirochika. 2004. Retrotransposon-induced mutations in grape skin color. Science 304: 982.
17. Koumi, P., H. E. Green, S. Hartley, D. Jordan, S. Lahec, R. J. Livett, K. W. Tsang and D. M. Ward. 2004. Evaluation and validation of the ABI3 700, ABI3100, and the MegaBACE 1000 capillary array electrophoresis instruments for use with short tandem repeat microsatellite typing in a forensic environment. Electrophoresis 25: 2227-2241.
18. Matsuyama, T., T. Abe, C.-H. Bae, Y. Takahashi, R. Kiuchi, T. Nakano, T. Asami and S. Yoshida. 2000. Adaptation of restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) to plant genome analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. Reptr. 18: 331-338.
19. Narayan, R. K. J. 1987. Nuclear DNA changes, genome differentiation and evolution in Nicotiana (Solanaceae). Plant System. Evol. 157: 161-180.
20. Ono, Y., T. Hayashi, M. Omura, T. Shimizu, M. Yamaguchi, M. Sato, H. Okada, Y. Oohashi and T. Yamamoto. 2004. Discriminational analysis of fruit and flower characteristics by SSR genotypes of peach cultivars. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 73 (Suppl. 2): 548 (In Japanese).
21. Rossouw, M., R. Warren and E. G. Hoal. 2002. Accurate microsatellite typing and inter-study comparison: pitfalls and solutions using interferon-γ (IFNG) and natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 2 (NRAMP2) genes as examples. 2002. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 40: 926-929.
22. Sassa, H., H. Hirano, T. Nishio and T. Koba. 1997. Style-specific self-compatible mutation caused by deletion of the S-RNase gene in Japanese pear (Pyrus serotina). Plant J. 12: 223-227.
23. Soppe, W. J. J., S. E. Jacobsen, C. Alonso-Blanco, J. P. Jackson, T. Kakutani, M. Koornneef and A. J. M. Peeters. 2000. The late flowering phenotype of fwa mutants is caused by gain-of-function epigenetic alleles of a homeodomain gene. Mol. Cell. 6: 791-802.
24. Yamaguchi, M. 2000. Phylogenetic classification of cultivars in peach. p. 57-63 (In Japanese). In: Encyclopedia of fruit fanning. 5, Rural Culture Association, Tokyo.
25. Yamamoto, T., K. Mochida, T. Imai, T. Haji, H. Yaegaki, M. Yamaguchi, N. Matsuta, I. Ogiwara and T. Hayashi. 2003. Parentage analysis in Japanese peaches using SSR markers. Breed. Sci. 53: 35-40.
26. Yamamoto, T., M. Yamaguchi and T. Hayashi. 2005. An integrated genetic linkage map of peach by SSR, STS, AFLP and RAPD. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 74: 204-213.
27. Warburton, M. L. and F. A. Bliss. 1996. Genetic diversity in peach (Prunus persica L. Batch) revealed by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers and compared to inbreeding coefficients. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121: 1012-1019.
28. Xu, M., X. Li and S. S. Korban. 2004. DNA-methylation alterations and exchanges during in vitro cellular differentiation in rose (Rosa hybrida L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 899-910.