Microsatellite allele sizing: Difference between automated capillary electrophoresis and manual technique

BioTechniques

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 810-818

  Delmotte, F ^a   Leterme, N ^a   Simon, J C ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOMES; DNA; ELECTROPHORESIS; GELS;

AUTOMATED SEQUENCER;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

DNA; MICROSATELLITE DNA; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS; GENE LOCUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; APHIDS; AUTOMATION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ELECTROPHORESIS, CAPILLARY; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 0034793825     PISSN: 07366205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Analysis of the VNTR locus D1S80 by the PCR followed by high-resolution PAGE
2. Comparative allele sizing can produce inaccurate allele size differences for microsatellites
3. Sensitivity, reproducibility, and accuracy in short tandem repeat genotyping using capillary array electrophoresis
4. Comparison of fluorescence-based semi-automated genotyping of multiple microsatellite loci with autoradiographic techniques
5. Isolation of microsatellite loci in the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi
6. Microevolution, low clonal diversity and genetic affinities of parthenogenetic Sitobion aphids in New Zealand