The psychophysiological detection of deception

The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts

Volumn 9780521833752, Issue , 2004, Pages 103-123

  Honts, Charles R ^a  

^a BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947401549     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511490071.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Alloway, W. R., and Honts, C. R. (2002, April). An information countermeasure has no effect on the validity of the Test for Espionage and Sabotage (TES). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Park City, Utah.
2. Amato, S. L., and Honts, C. R. (1994). What do psychophysiologists think about polygraph tests? A survey of the membership of SPR. Psychophysiology, 31, S22. [Abstract]
3. Amato-Henderson, S. L., Honts, C. R., and Plaud, J. J. (1996). Effects of misinformation on the Concealed Knowledge Test. Psychophysiology, 33, S18. [Abstract]
4. American Society for Testing and Materials (2000). Standard guide for PDD examination standards of practice. ASTM Designation: E 2062 00.
5. Anderson, C. A., Lindsay, J. J., and Bushman, B. J. (1999). Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or triviality? Current Directions In Psychological Science, 8, 3-9.
6. Barland, G. H. (1988). The polygraph test in the US and elsewhere. In A.Gale (ed.) The polygraph test: Lies, truth, and science (73-95). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7. Barland, G. H., Honts, C. R., and Barger, S. D. (1989). Studies of the accuracy of security screening polygraph examinations. Department of Defense Polygraph Institute, Fort McClellan, Alabama.
8. Bell, B. G., Raskin, D. C., Honts, C. R., and Kircher, J. C. (1999). The Utah numerical scoring system. Polygraph, 28, 1-9.
9. Ben-Shakhar, G., and Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception. New York: Springer.
10. Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11. Crewson, P. E. (2001). A comparative analysis of polygraph with other screening and diagnostic tools. Report on Contract No. DABT60-01-P-3017 to the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute.
12. Department of Defense Polygraph Institute Research Division Staff (1998). Psychophysiological detection of deception accuracy rates obtained using the Test for Espionage and Sabotage (TES). Polygraph, 27, 68-73.
13. Driscoll, L. N., Honts, C. R., and Jones D. (1987). The validity of the positive control physiological detection of deception technique. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15, 46-50.
14. Elaad, E. (1990). Detection of guilty knowledge in real-life criminal investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 521-9.
15. Gallup Organization (1984). Survey of the members of the Society for Psychophysiological Research concerning their opinions of polygraph test interpretations, Polygraph, 12, 153-65.
16. Ginton, A., Netzer, D., Elaad, E., and Ben-Shakhar, G. (1982). A method for evaluating the use of the polygraph in a real-life situation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 131-7.
17. Hira, S., and Furumitsu, I. (2002). Polygraphic examinations in Japan: Application of the guilty knowledge test in forensic investigations. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 4, 16-27.
18. Honts, C. R. (1991). The emperor's new clothes: Application of polygraph tests in the American workplace. Forensic Reports, 4, 91-116.
19. Honts, C. R. (1994). The psychophysiological detection of deception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 77-82.
20. Honts, C. R. (1996). Criterion development and validity of the control question test in field application. Journal of General Psychology, 123, 309-24.
21. Honts, C. R., and Amato, S. (2002). Countermeasures. In M.Kleiner (ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (251-64). London: Academic.
22. Honts, C. R., Amato, S., and Gordon, A. K. (2001). Effects of spontaneous countermeasures used against the comparison question test. Polygraph, 30, 1-9.
23. Honts, C. R., Amato, S., and Gordon, A. K. (2004). Effects of outside issues on the Control Question Test. Journal of General Psychology, 151, 53-74.
24. Honts, C. R., Devitt, M. K., Winbush, M., and Kircher, J. C. (1996). Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of the concealed knowledge test. Psychophysiology, 33, 84-92.
25. Honts, C. R., Hodes, R. L., and Raskin, D. C. (1985). Effects of physical countermeasures on the physiological detection of deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 177-87.
26. Honts, C. R., and Perry, M. V. (1992). Polygraph admissibility: Changes and challenges. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 357-79.
27. Honts, C. R., and Raskin, D. C. (1988). A field study of the validity of the directed lie control question. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 16, 56-61.
28. Honts, C. R., Raskin, D. C., and Kircher, J. C. (1987). Effects of physical countermeasures and their electromyographic detection during polygraph tests for deception. Journal of Psychophysiology, 1, 241-7.
29. Honts, C. R., Raskin, D. C., and Kircher, J. C. (1994). Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of polygraph tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 252-9.
30. Honts, C. R., Raskin, D. C., and Kircher, J. C. (2002). The scientific status of research on polygraph techniques: the case for polygraph tests. In D. L. Faigman, D.Kaye, M. J.Saks, and J.Sanders (eds.), Modern scientific evidence: The law and science of expert testimony, Vol. II (pp. 446-83). St. Paul, MN: West.
31. Honts, C. R., Raskin, D. C., Kircher, J. C., and Hodes, R. L. (1988). Effects of spontaneous countermeasures on the physiological detection of deception. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 16, 91-4.
32. Honts, C. R., Thurber, S., Cvencek, D., and Alloway, W. (2002, March). General acceptance of the polygraph by the scientific community: Two surveys of professional attitudes. Paper presented at the American Psychology-Law Society biennial meeting, Austin, Texas.
33. Horowitz, S. W., Kircher, J. C., Honts, C. R., and Raskin, D. C. (1997). The role of comparison questions in physiological detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 34, 108-15.
34. Horvath, F. S. (1977). The effect of selected variables on interpretation of polygraph records. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 127-36.
35. Iacono, W. G., and Lykken, D. T. (1997a). The validity of the lie detector: Two surveys of scientific opinion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 426-33.
36. Iacono, W. G., and Lykken, D. T. (2002). The scientific status of research on polygraph techniques: The case against polygraph tests. In D. L. Faigman, D. Kaye, M. J.Saks, and J.Sanders (eds.), Modern scientific evidence: The law and science of expert testimony, Vol. II (pp. 483-538). St. Paul, MN: West.
37. Kevin Lee, et al., v. Honorable Lourdes Martinez, et al., Case No. CS-2003-0026. (2003). Transcript of sworn testimony.
38. Kircher, J. C., Horowitz, S.W., and Raskin, D. C. (1988). Meta-analysis of mock crime studies of the control question polygraph technique. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 79-90.
39. Kircher, J. C., and Raskin, D. C. (1988). Human versus computerized evaluations of polygraph data in a laboratory setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 291-302.
40. Kleinmuntz, B., and Szucko, J. (1984). A field study of the fallibility of polygraphic lie detection. Nature, 308, 449-50.
41. Krapohl, D. (2002). The polygraph in personnel screening. In M.Kleiner (ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing, (pp. 217-36). London: Academic.
42. Lombroso, C. (1895). L'Homme Criminel (2nd edn). Paris: Felix Alcan.
43. Lykken, D. T. (1998). A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector. New York: Plenum Trade.
44. Merckelbach, H., Smulders, F., Jelicic, M., and Meijer, E. (2003). Unpublished survey document distributed October 2003. University of Maastricht, the Netherlands.
45. National Research Council (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
46. Otter-Henderson, K., Honts, C. R., and Amato, S. L. (2002). Spontaneous countermeasures during polygraph examinations: An apparent exercise in futility. Polygraph, 31, 9-14.
47. Patrick, C. J., and Iacono, W. G. (1989). Psychopathy, threat and polygraph test accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 347-55.
48. Patrick, C. J., and Iacono, W. G. (1991). Validity of the control question polygraph test: The problem of sampling bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 229-38.
49. Podlesny, J. A. (1993). Is the guilty knowledge polygraph technique applicable in criminal investigations? A Review of FBI case records. Crime Laboratory Digest, 20, 57-61.
50. Podlesny, J. A., and Raskin, D. C. (1978). Effectiveness of techniques and physiological measures in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 15, 344-58.
51. Podlesny, J. A., and Truslow, C. M. (1993). Validity of an expanded-issue (modified general question) polygraph technique in a simulated distributed-crimeroles context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 788-97.
52. Raskin, D. C. (1986). The polygraph in 1986: Scientific, professional, and legal issues surrounding applications and acceptance of polygraph evidence. Utah Law Review, 1986, 29-74.
53. Raskin, D. C., and Hare, R. D. (1978). Psychopathy and detection of deception in a prison population. Psychophysiology, 15, 121-36.
54. Raskin, D. C., and Honts, C. R. (2002). The comparison question test. In M.Kleiner (ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 1-49). London: Academic.
55. Raskin, D. C., Kircher, J. C., Honts, C. R., and Horowitz, S. W. (1988). A study of the validity of polygraph examinations in criminal investigation (Grant No. 85-IJ-CX-0040). Salt Lake City: University of Utah, Department of Psychology.
56. Rovner, L. I. (1986). The accuracy of physiological detection of deception for subjects with prior knowledge. Polygraph, 15, 1-39.
57. Verschuere, B., (2003, October). Heart rate orienting to guilty knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Chicago, IL, USA.