Criterion development and validity of the cqt in field application

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 123, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 309-324

  Honts, Charles R ^a  

^a BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344712902     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: 19400888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221309.1996.9921283     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barland, G. H., Honts, C. R., & Barger, S. D. (1989). The validity of detection of deception for multiple issues. Psychophysiology. 26, SI3. (Abstract)
2. Barland, G. H., & Raskin, D. C. (1975). An evaluation of field techniques in detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 12. 321-330.
3. Bradley, M. T., & Ainsworth, D. (1984). Alcohol and psychophysiological detection of deception. Psychophysiology. 21. 63-71.
4. Bradley, M. T., & Janisse, M. T. (1981). Accuracy demonstrations, threat, and the detection of deception: Cardiovascular, elcctrodcrmal. and pupillary measures. Psychophysiology. 18 307-315.
5. Furedy, J. J. (1993). The "control" question "test" (CQT) polygraphcr's dilemma: Logi-co-ethical considerations for psychophysiological practitioners and researchers. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 263-267.
6. Ginton, A., Netzer, D., EÍaad, E., & Bcn-Shakhar, G. (1982). A method for evaluating the use of the polygraph in a real-life situation. Journal of Applied Psychology. 67, 131-137.
7. Honts, C. R. (1991). Task I Report: Field validity study of Canadian Police College Polygraph Technique. Contract No. M90I0-1-F107/0A-ST. Progress report submitted to the Canadian Police Research Center.
8. Honts, C. R. (1994). The psychophysiological detection of deception. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 3, 77-82.
9. Hunts, C. R., Kircher, J. C., & Raskin, D. C. (1995). Polygrapher's dilemma or psychologist's chimaera: A reply to Furedy's logico-ethical considerations for psychophysio-logical practitioners and researchers. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 20, 199-207.
10. Honts, C. R., & Perry, M. V. (1992). Polygraph admissibility: Changes and challenges. Law and Human Behavior. 16, 357-379.
11. Honts, C. R., & Quick, B. D. (1995). The polygraph in 1995: Progress in science and the law. North Dakota Law Review, 71, 987-1020.
12. Honts, C. R., & Raskin, D. C. (1988). A field study of the validity of the directed lie control question. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 16. 56-61.
13. lacono, W. G., & Patrick, C. J. (1988). Assessing deception: Polygraph techniques. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 205-233). New York: Guilford.
14. Kassin, S. M., & Kiechel, K. L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science. 7, 125-128.
15. Kircher, J. C., Horowitz, S. W., & Raskin, D. C. (1988). Meta-analysis of mock crime studies of the control question polygraph technique. Law and Human Behavior. 12, 79-90.
16. Kircher, J. C., & Raskin, D. C. (1982). Cross-validation of a computerized diagnostic procedure for detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 20, 568-569. (Abstract)
17. Kircher, J. C., & Raskin, D. C. (1988). Human versus computerized evaluations of polygraph data in a laboratory setting. Journal of Applied Psychology. 73, 291-302.
18. Kircher, J. C., Raskin, D. C., Honts, C. R., & Horowitz, S. W. (October, 1994). General-izability of statistical classifiers for the detection of deception. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Atlanta, GA.
19. Kleinmuniz, B., & Szucko, J. J. (1982). On the fallibility of lie detection. Law and Society Review, 17. 85-104.
20. Lykken, D. T. (1981). Tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Munchinsky, P. M. (1993). Psychology applied to work: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
22. Office of Technology Assessment (1983). Scientific validity of polygraph testing: A research review and evaluation-A technical memorandum (OTA-TM-H-15). Washington. DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
23. Patrick, C. J., & lacono, W. G. (1991). Validity of the control question polygraph test: The problem of sampling bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 229-238.
24. Podlesny, J. A., & Raskin, D. C. (1978). Effectiveness of techniques and physiological measures in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology. 15, 344-358.
25. Raskin, D. C. (1986). The polygraph in 1986: Scientific, professional and legal issues surrounding application and acceptance of polygraph evidence. Utah Law Review, 1986, 29-74.
26. Raskin, D. C. (1989). Polygraph techniques for the detection of deception. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal inwstigation and evidence (pp. 247-296). New York: Springer.
27. Raskin, D. C., & Hare, R. D. (1978). Psychopathy and detection of deception in a prison population. Psychophysiology, 15. 126-136.
28. Raskin, D. C., Honts, C. R., & Kircher, J. C. (in press). The scientific status of research on polygraph techniques: The case for polygraph tests, In D. L. Faigman, D. Kaye, M. J. Saks, & J. Sanders (Eds.), Modern scientific evidence: The law and science of expert testimony.
29. Raskin, D. C., Kirchcr, J. C., Honts, C. R., & Horowitz, S. W. (1988). A study of the validity of polygraph examinations in criminal investigations. Final report to the National Institute of Justice. Salt Lake City: University of Utah. Department of Psychology. (Grant No. 85-IJ-CX-0400)
30. Rovner, L. I., Raskin, D. C., & Kircher, J. A. (1979). Effects of information and practicc on detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 16. 198. (Abstract)
31. Szucko, J. J., & Kleinmuntz, D. (1981). Statistical versus clinical lie detection. American Psychologist. 36, 488-496.