Risk-based maintenance-Techniques and applications

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 142, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 653-661

  Arunraj, N S ^a   Maiti, J ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Decision making; Quality of risk analysis; Risk assessment; Risk based maintenance

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; DECISION MAKING; FAILURE ANALYSIS; MAINTENANCE; RISK ANALYSIS;

MAINTENANCE DECISIONS; MAINTENANCE PLANNING; RISK-BASED MAINTENANCE;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ACCIDENTS; DECISION MAKING; FAILURE ANALYSIS; MAINTENANCE; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; DECISION MAKING; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; MAINTENANCE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ARTICLE; BUILDING MATERIAL; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; DECISION MAKING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; METHODOLOGY; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ACCIDENTS, OCCUPATIONAL; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; MAINTENANCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33947390406     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.069     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Moubray J.M. Reliability-Centred Maintenance (1994), Butterworth/Heinemann, Oxford
2. Bevilacqua M., and Braglia M. The analytical hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 70 (2000) 71-83
3. Khan F.I., and Haddara M. Risk-based maintenance (RBM): a quantitative approach for maintenance/inspection scheduling and planning. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 16 (2003) 561-573
4. Brown S.J., and May I.L. Risk-based hazardous protection and prevention by inspection and maintenance. Trans. ASME J. Press. Ves. Technol. 122 (2003) 362-367
5. Cooke F.L. Plant maintenance strategy: evidence from four British manufacturing firms. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 9 3 (2003) 239-249
6. Raouf A. Productivity enhancement using safety and maintenance integration: an overview. Int. J. Syst. Cybernet. 33 7 (2004) 1116-1126
7. Khan F.I., and Haddara M. Risk-based maintenance (RBM): a new approach for process plant inspecton and maintenance. Process Saf. Prog. 23 4 (2004) 252-265
8. Nieuwhof G.W.E. Risk: a probabilistic concept. Reliab. Eng. 10 (1985) 183-188
9. Arendt J.S. Using quantitative risk assessment in the chemical process industry. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 29 (1990) 133-149
10. Rimington J.D. Overview of risk assessment. Trans. IChemE Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 71 B (1993) 112-116
11. Carter D.A., Hirst I.L., Maddison T.E., and Porter S.R. Appropriate risk assessment methods for major accident establishments. Trans. IChemE Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 81 B (2003) 12-18
12. Khan F.I., and Haddara M. Risk-based maintenance of ethylene oxide production facilities. J. Hazard. Mater. A 108 (2004) 147-159
13. Tixier J., Dusserre G., Salvi O., and Gaston D. Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 15 (2002) 291-303
14. R.L. Rogers, The RASE project risk assessment of unit operations and equipment, 2000, http://www.safetynet.de/.
15. Khan F.I., and Abbasi S.A. Techniques and methodologies of risk analysis in chemical process industries. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 11 (1998) 261-277
16. Kletz T.A. Eliminating potential process hazards. Chem. Eng. (1985) 48-68
17. Shafaghi A., and Cook F.B. Application of hazard and operability study to hazard evaluation of an absorption heat pump. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 37 2 (1988) 159-166
18. Jacobs H.C. Improve process safety reviews. Hydrocarb. Process. (1989) 66-72
19. Montague D.F. Process risk evaluation-what method to use?. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 29 (1990) 27-53
20. Kelly W.J. Oversights and mythology in a HAZOP program. Hydrocarb. Process. (1991) 114-116
21. Jones D.W. Lessons from HAZOP experiences. Hydrocarb. Process. (1992) 77-80
22. Kletz T.A. HAZOP-past and future. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 55 (1997) 263-266
23. Kennedy R., and Kirwan B. Development of a hazard and operability-based method for identifying safety management vulnerabilities in high risk systems. Saf. Sci. 30 (1998) 249-274
24. McCoy S.A., Wakeman S.J., Larkin F.D., Jefferson M.L., Chung P.W.H., Rushton A.G., Lees F.P., and Heino P.M. HAZID, a computer aid for hazard identification. 1. STOPHAZ package and the HAZID code: an overview, the issues and the structure. Trans. IChemE Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 77 B (1999) 317-327
25. Papazoglou I.A., Aneziris O.N., Post J.G., and Ale B.J.M. Technical modeling in integrated risk assessment of chemical installations. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 15 (2002) 545-554
26. Khan F.I., and Abbasi S.A. OptHAZOP-an effective and optimum approach for HAZOP study. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 10 3 (1997) 191-204
27. Toola A. Plant level safety analysis. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 5 2 (1992) 119-124
28. Ganger J.J., and Bearrow M.E. How to prioritize process hazards analyses. Hydrocarb. Process. (1993) 95-98
29. Smith K.E. Six steps to effectively update and revalidate PHAs. Chem. Eng. Prog. (2001) 70-77
30. Baybutt P. On the ability of process hazard analysis to identify accidents. Process Saf. Prog. 22 3 (2003) 191-194
31. Whelton C.P. Sneak analysis of process systems. Trans. IChemE Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 71 B (1993) 169-179
32. Kao C.S., and Ku K.H. Acrylic reactor runaway and explosion accident analysis. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 15 (2002) 213-222
33. Dey P.K., Ogunlana S.O., and Naksuksakul S. Risk-based maintenance model for offshore oil and gas pipelines: a case study. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 10 3 (2004) 169-183
34. Masataka Y., Jun T., Hidenari B., Toshiharu K., and Akio F. Application of risk-based maintenance on materials handling systems. IHI Eng. Rev. 37 2 (2004) 52-58
35. Hokstad P., Øien K., and Reinertsen R. Recommendations on the use of expert judgement in safety and reliability engineering studies. Two offshore case studies. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 61 (1998) 65-76
36. Gillett J.E. Rapid ranking of process hazards. Process Eng. (1985) 19-22
37. Khan F.I., and Abbasi S.A. Simulation of accidents in a chemical industry using the software package MAXCRED. Indian J. Chem. Technol. 3 (1996) 338-344
38. Khan F.I., and Abbasi S.A. A maximum credible accident analysis based quantitative risk assessment study of a chemical process industry. Indian Chem. Eng., Sec. B 39 2 (1997) 164-172
39. Khan F.I. Use maximum-credible accident scenarios for realistic and reliable risk assessment. Chem. Eng. Prog. (2001) 56-64
40. Khan F.I., and Abbasi S.A. A criterion for developing credible accident scenarios for risk assessment. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 15 (2002) 467-475
41. Khan F.I., and Abbasi S.A. Accident hazard index: a multi attribute method for process industry hazard rating. Trans. IChemE Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 75 4 (1997) 217-224
42. Kao C.S., and Duo Y.S. Chemical runaway reaction hazard index and risk assessment. Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries (1998) 965-975
43. Dow's Chemical Exposure Index Guide. 1st ed. (1994), American Institute of Chemical Engineers
44. Dow's Fire and Explosion Index Hazard Classification Guide. 7th ed. (1994), American Institute of Chemical Engineers
45. Krishna K., Wang Y., Saraf S.R., Rogers W.J., Baldwin J.T., Gupta J.P., and Mannan M.S. Hydroxylamine production: will a QRA help you decide?. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 81 (2003) 215-224
46. Khan F.I., Husain T., and Abbasi S.A. Safety weighted hazard index (SWeHI) a new user-friendly tool for swift yet comprehensive hazard identification and safety evaluation in chemical process industries. Trans. IChemE Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 79 B (2001) 65-80
47. Vervallin C.H. Hazard evaluation. Hydrocarb. Process. (1986) 35-40
48. Nivolianitou Z.S., Leopoulos V.N., and Konstantinidou M. Comparison of techniques for accident scenario analysis in hazardous in hazardous systems. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 17 (2004) 467-475
49. Khan F.I., and Abbasi S.A. Analytical simulation and PROFAT. II. A new methodology and a computer automated tool for fault tree analysis in chemical process industries. J. Hazard. Mater. A 75 (2000) 1-27
50. Tanaka H., Fan L.T., Lai F.S., and Toguchi K. Fault-tree analysis by fuzzy probability. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 32 5 (1983) 453-457
51. Mohan S., Elango K., and Sivakumar S. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics. INDIN 2003 (2003) 351-357
52. Hirst I.L., and Carter D.A. A "worst case" methodology for risk assessment of major accident installations. Process Saf. Prog. 19 2 (2000) 78-85
53. Van Sciver G.R. Quantitative risk analysis in the chemical process industry. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 29 (1990) 55-68
54. Melchers R.E., and Feutrill W.R. Risk assessment of LPG automotive refueling facilities. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 74 (2001) 283-290
55. Roy P.K., Bhatt A., and Rajagopal C. Quantitative risk assessment for accidental release of titanium tetrachloride in a titanium sponge production plant. J. Hazard. Mater. A 102 (2003) 167-186
56. Khan F.I., and Abbasi S.A. Risk analysis of an epichlorohydrin manufacturing industry using the new computer automated tool MAXCRED. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 10 2 (1997) 91-100
57. Khan F.I., and Abbasi S.A. Rapid quantitative risk assessment of a petrochemical industry using a new software MAXCRED. J. Cleaner Prod. 6 (1998) 9-22
58. Khan F.I., and Abbasi S.A. TORAP-a new tool for conducting rapid risk assessments in petroleum refineries and petrochemical industries. Appl. Energ. 65 (2000) 187-210
59. Markowski A.S. Quantitative risk assessment improves refinery safety. Oil Gas J. (2002) 56-63
60. Guymer P., Kaiser G.D., and McKelvey T.C. Probabilistic risk assessment in the CPI. Chem. Eng. Prog. (1987) 37-45
61. Khan F.I., and Abbasi S.A. Risk analysis of a typical chemical industry using ORA procedure. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 14 (2001) 43-59
62. Kusaik A., and Zakarian A. Risk assessment of process models. Comput. Ind. Eng. 30 4 (1996) 599-610
63. Khan F.I., and Abbasi S.A. Estimation of probabilities and likely consequences of a chain of accidents (domino effect) in Manali Industrial Complex. J. Cleaner Prod. 9 (2001) 493-508
64. Summers A.E. Introduction to layers of protection analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 104 (2003) 163-168
65. Chen J.-R., and Yang Y.-T. A predictive risk index for safety performance in process industries. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 17 (2004) 233-242
66. Bernaik A., and Libisova M. Loss prevention in heavy industry: risk assessment of large gasholders. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 17 (2004) 271-278
67. IAEA-TECDOC-727, Manual for the Classification and Prioritization of Risks Due to Major Accidents in the Process and Related Industries, International Atomic Energy Agency, Austria, 1996.
68. Hauptamanns U. Semi-quantitative fault tree analysis for process plant safety using frequency and probability ranges. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 17 (2004) 339-345
69. Allum S., and Wells G.L. Short-cut risk assessment. Trans. IChemE Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 71 B (1993) 161-168
70. Schlechter W. Process risk assessment-using science to "do it right". Int. J. Press. Ves. Pip. 61 (1995) 479-494
71. Backlund F., and Hannu J. Can we make maintenance decisions on risk analysis results?. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 8 1 (2002) 77-91
72. Fujiyama K., Nagai S., Akikuni Y., Fujiwara T., Furuya K., Matsumoto S., Takagi K., and Kawabata T. Risk-based inspection and maintenance systems for steam turbines. Int. J. Press. Ves. Pip. 81 10/11 (2004) 825-835
73. Krishnasamy L., Khan F.I., and Haddara M. Development of a risk-based maintenance (RBM) strategy for a power-generating plant. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 18 (2005) 69-81
74. Antaki G.A., Monahon T.M., and Cansler R.W. Risk-based inspection (RBI) of team systems. Proceedings of the ASME PVP Conference on Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference (July 2005)
75. Dey P.K. A risk-based maintenance model for inspection and maintenance of cross-country petroleum pipeline. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 7 1 (2001) 25-41
76. Khan F.I., Sadiq R., and Haddara M. Risk-based inspection and maintenance (RBIM) multi-attribute decision making with aggregate risk analysis. Trans. IChemE Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 82 B6 (2004) 398-411