Current controversies in CAPD: From procrustes' bed to pandora's box

An Introduction to Auditory Processing Disorders in Children

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 247-263

  McFarland, Dennis J ^a   Cacace, Anthony T ^b  

^a WADSWORTH CENTER   (United States)

^b ALBANY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85120660482     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (72)

1. Agnew, J. A., Dorn, C., & Eden, G. F. (2004). Effect of intensive training on auditory processing and reading skills. Brain and Language, 88, 21-25.
2. Amos, N. E., & Humes, L. E. (1998). SCAN test-reliability for first- and third-grade children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 834-845.
3. ASHA. (1996). Central auditory processing: Current status of research and implications for practice. American Journal of Audiology, 5, 41-53.
4. Barinaga, M. (1996). Giving language skills a boost. Science, 271, 27-28.
5. Bates, T. C. (2005). Auditory inspection time and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 115-127.
6. Bates, T. C., & Eysenk, H. J. (1993). Intelligence, inspection time, and decision time. Intelligence, 17, 523-531.
7. Bellis, T. J., & Ferre, J. M. Multidimensional approach to the differential diagnosis of central auditory processing disorders in children. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 10, 319-328.
8. Boring, E. G. (1923). Intelligence as the tests test it. New Republic, 35, 35-37.
9. Bradshaw, J. L., Burden, V., & Nettleton, N. C. (1986). Dichotic and dichhaptic techniques. Neuropsychologia, 24, 79-90.
10. Burton, D. B., Ryan, J. J., Axelrod, B. N., & Schellenberger, T. (2002). A confirmatory factor analysis of WAIS-III in a clinical sample with cross-validation in the standardization sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17, 371-387.
11. Cacace, A. T., McFarland, D. J., Emrich, J. F., & Haller, J. S. (1992). Assessing short-term recognition memory with forced-choice psychophysical methods. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 44, 145-155.
12. Cacace, A. T., & McFarland, D. J. (1995). Opening Pandora's box: The reliability of CAPD tests. American Journal of Audiology, 4, 61-62.
13. Cacace, A. T., & McFarland, D. J. (1998). Central auditory processing disorder in school-aged children: A critical review. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 41, 355-373.
14. Cacace, A. T., McFarland, D. J., Ouimet, J. R., Schrieber, E. J., & Marro. P. (2000). Temporal processing deficits in remediation-resistant reading-impaired children. Audiology and Neurootology, 5, 83-97.
15. Campbell, D. T., & Fisk, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 1-21.
16. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytical studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Chermak, G. G. (2002). Deciphering auditory processing disorders in children. Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am. 35(4), 733-749.
18. Christopherson, L. A., & Humes, L. E. (1992). Some psychometric properties of the Test of Vasic Auditory Capabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 929-935.
19. Dawson, G., & Watling, R. (2000). Interventions to facilitate auditory, visual, and motor integration in autism: A review of the evidence. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 415-421.
20. Deary, I. J., Bell, P. J., Bell, A. J., Campbell, M. L., & Fazal, N. D. (2004). Sensory discrimination and intelligence: Testing Spearman's other hypothesis. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 1-18.
21. Deary, I. J., & Stough, C. (1996). Intelligence and inspection time: Achievements, prospects, and problems. American Psychologist, 51, 599-608.
22. Delb, W., Strauss, D. J., Hohenberg, G., & Plinkert, P. (2002). The binaural interaction component (BIC) in children with central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). International Journal of Audiology, 42, 401-412.
23. Editorial. (2004). Better reading through brain research. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1.
24. Eid, M., Lischetzke, T., Nussbeck, F. W., & Trierweiler, L. I. (2003). Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait-multimethod models: A multiple indicator CT-C(M-1) model. Psychological Methods, 8, 38-60.
25. Emanuel, D. C. (2002). The auditory processing battery: Survey of common practices. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13, 93-117.
26. Evarts, E. V. (1952). Effects of auditory cortex ablation on frequency discrimination in monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 15, 443-448.
27. Friel-Patti, S. (1999). Clinical decision-making in the assessment and intervention of central auditory processing disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing in Schools, 30, 345-352.
28. Gillam, R. B. (1999). Computer-assisted language intervention using Fast ForWord®: Theoretical and empirical considerations for clinical decision-making. Language, Speech, and Hearing in Schools, 30, 363-370.
29. Gillam, R. B., Loeb, D. F., & Friel-Patti, S. (2001). Looking back: A summary of five exploratory studies of Fast ForWord. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 269-273.
30. Green, D. M., & Sweets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
31. Hartley, E. H., Hill, P. R., & Moore, D. R. (2003). The auditory basis of language impairments: Temporal processing versus processing efficiency hypotheses. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 67S1, S137-S142.
32. Heath, S. M., & Hogben, J. H. (2004). The reliability and validity of tasks measuring perception of rapid sequences in children with dyslexia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1275-1287.
33. Hook, P. E., Macaruso, P., & Jones, S. (2001). Efficacy of Fast ForWord training on facilitating acquisition of reading skills by children with reading difficulties-a longitudinal study. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 75-96.
34. Hulslander, J., Talcott, J., Witton, C., DeFries, J., Pennington, B., Wadsworth, S., Willcutt, E., & Olson, R. (2004). Sensory processing, reading, IQ, and attention. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 274-295.
35. Jerger, J. (1998). Controversial issues in central auditory processing disorders. Seminars in Hearing, 19, 393-398.
36. Jerger, J., & Musiek, F. (2000). Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 11, 467-174.
37. Jerger, J., Weikers N. J., Sharbrough, F. W., 3rd, & Jerger, S. (1969). Bilateral lesions of the temporal lobe. A case study. Acta Otolaryngologica, Supplement, 258, 1-51.
38. Kamhi, A. G. (2004). A meme's eye view of speech-language pathology. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 105-111.
39. Keith, R. W. (1999). Clinical issues in central auditory processing disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 30, 339-344.
40. Kettlewell, P. W. (2004). Development, dissemination, and implementation of evidence-based treatments: Commentary. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 190-195.
41. Livingston, R. B., Jennings, E., Reynolds, C. R., & Gray, R. M. (2003). Multivariate analyses of the profile stability of intelligence tests: High for IQs, low to very low for subtest analyses. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 487-507.
42. Lohr, K. N., Eleazer, K., & Mauskopf, J. (1998). Health policy issues and applications for evidence-based medicine and clinical practice guidelines. Health Policy, 46, 1-19.
43. Lynn, G. E., & Gilroy, J. (1977). Evaluation of central auditory dysfunction in patients with neurological disorders. In R. W. Keith (Ed.), Central auditory dysfunction (pp. 177-221). New York: Grune & Stratton.
44. McFarland, D. J., & Cacace, A. T. (1995). Modality specificity as a criterion for diagnosing central auditory processing disorders. American Journal of Audiology, 4, 36-48.
45. Medwetsky, L. (2002). Central auditory processing testing: A battery approach. In J. Katz, R. F. Burkard, & L. Medwetsky (Eds.), Handbook of clinical audiology, (5th ed., pp. 510-524). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkens.
46. Meline, T., & Paradiso, T. (2003). Evidence-based practice in schools: Evaluating research and reducing barriers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 273-283.
47. Merz, W. R. (1998). Review of SCAN-A: A test for auditory processing disorders in adolescents and adults. In J. C. Impara & B. S. Plake (Eds.), The thirteenth mental measurements yearbook, Buros Institute of Mental Measurements (pp. 870-871). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
48. Merzenich, M. M., Jenkins, W. M., Johnston, P., Schreiner, C., Miller, S., & Tallal, P. (1996). Temporal processing deficits of language-impaired children ameliorated by training. Science, 271, 77-80.
49. Moore, B. C. J., Glasberg, B. R., Plack, C. J., & Biswass, A. K. (1988). The shape of the ears temporal window. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 1102-1116.
50. Mudford, O. C., Cross, B. A., Breen, S., Cillen, C., Reeves, D., Gould, J., & Douglas, J. (2000). Auditory integration training for children with autism: No behavioral benefits detected. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 105, 118-129.
51. Musiek, F. E., Baran, J. A., & Schochat, E. (1999). Selected management approaches to central auditory processing disorders. Scandinavian Audiology, Supplement, 28, 63-76.
52. Olsson, H., Bjorkman, C., Haag, K., & Juslin, P. (1998). Auditory inspection time: On the importance of selecting the appropriate sensory continuum. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 627-634.
53. Oyler, R., Rosenhagen, K., & Michal, M. (1998). Sensitivity and specificity of Keith's auditory continuous performance test. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 29, 180-185.
54. Peterson, D. R. (2004). Science, scientism, and professional responsibility. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 196-210.
55. The Psychological Corporation. (1997). WAIS-III, updated: Technical manual. San Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Corporation.
56. Rees, N. S. (1973). Auditory processing factors in language disorders: The view from Procrustes' bed. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 38, 304-315.
57. Rees, N. S. (1981). Saying more than we know: Is auditory processing disorder a useful concept? In R. W. Keith (Ed.), Central auditory and language disorders in children (pp. 94-120). San Diego: College Hill Press.
58. Rosenberg, G. G. (2002). Classroom acoustics and personal FM technology in management of auditory processing disorder. Seminars in Hearing, 23, 309-317.
59. Rouse, C. E., & Krueger, A. B. (2004). Putting computerized instruction to the test: A randomized evaluation of a "scientifically based" reading program. Economics of Education Review, 23, 323-338.
60. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1999). Theory, Testing, and Measurement Error. Intelligence, 27, 183-198.
61. Schow, R. L., Seikel, J. A., Chermak, G. D., & Berent, M. (2000). Central auditory processes and test measures: ASHA 1996 revised. American Journal of Audiology, 9, 63-68.
62. Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Successful intelligence: Finding a balance. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 436-442.
63. Swets, J. A. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285-1293.
64. Tallal, P., Miller, S., Bedi, G., Byma, G., Wang, X., Nagarajan, S. S., Schreiner, C., Jenkins, W. M., & Merzenich, M. M. (1996). Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science, 271, 81-84.
65. Temple, E., Deutsch, G. K., Poldrack, R. A., Miller, S. L., Tallal, P., & Merzenich, M. M. (2003). Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: Evidence from functional MRI. Science, 100, 2860-2865.
66. Tyler, L. E. (1965). The psychology ofHuman Differences, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York 3rd ed.
67. Verbaten, M. N., Kemner, C., Buitelaar, J. K., van Ree, J. M., van Beijsterveld, C. E. M., & van Engeland, H. (1996). Effects of ORG-2766 on brain event-related potentials of autistic children. Psychiatry Research, 63, 33-45.
68. Voyer, D. (2003). Reliability and Magnitude of Perceptual Asymmetries in a Dichotic Word Recognition Task. Neuropsychology, 17, 393-401.
69. Watson, C. S. (1994). How does psychoacoustics show that central auditory processing is critical to audition? The view from psychoacoustics. In Proceedings of Consensus Development Conference on Central Auditory Processing (pp. 1-21). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language and Hearing Association.
70. Watson, C. S., Kidd, G. R., Horner, D. G., Connell, P. J., Lowther, A., Eddins, D. A., Krueger, G., Goss, D. A., Rainey, B. B., Gospel, M. D., & Watson, B. U. (2003). Sensory, cognitive, and linguistic factors in the early academic performance of elementary school children: The Benton-IU Project. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 165-197.
71. Wertz, D., Hall, J. W., & Davis, W. (2002). Auditory processing disorders: Management approaches past to present. Seminars in Hearing, 23, 277-285.
72. Yencer, K. A. (1998). The effects of auditory integration training for children with central auditory processing disorders. American Journal of Audiology, 7, 1-13.