Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 10-17

  Wagener, Kirsten ^a   Josvassen, Jane Lignel ^b   Ardenkjær, Regitze ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^b GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Danish Hagerman sentences; DANTALE II; Sentence test in noise; Speech intelligibility; Speech reception threshold (SRT)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SWEDEN; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NOISE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST;

EID: 0037504237     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14992020309056080     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ardenkjær-Madsen R, Josvassen JL (2001). Forslag til en ny dansk sætningsbaseret audiovisuel taleaudiometrisk test i stoj [Suggestion for a new Danish sentence based audiovisual speech audiometric test in noise]. MA thesis in Speech and Hearing Science, University of Copenhagen.
2. Bergenholtz H (1992). Dansk frekvensordbog baseret på danske romaner, ugeblade og aviser 1987-1990 [Dictionary of word frequency in Danish based on danish novels, magazines and papers 1987-1990]. Copenhagen: Gad.
3. Brand T, Kollmeier B (2002). Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. J Acoust Soc Am 111(6):2801-2810.
4. Byrne B, Dillon H, Tran K, et al (1994). An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am 96(4): 2108-2120.
5. Hagerman B (1982). Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol 11:79-87.
6. Hagerman B, Kinnefors C (1995). Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise. Scand Audiol 24:71-77.
7. International Organization for Standardization (1989). Acoustics. Audiometric test methods - Part 1: Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. ISO 8253-1. Geneva: ISO.
8. Kollmeier B (1990). Messmethodik, Modellierung und Verbesserung der Verständlichkeit von Sprache (Habilitation). Göttingen: Georg-August-Universität.
9. Kollmeier B, Wesselkamp M (1997). Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am 102(4):2412-2421.
10. Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA (1994). Development of hearing in noise test for measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 95:1085-1099.
11. Plomp R, Mimpen AM (1979). Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 18:43-52.
12. Wagener K, Brand T, Kollmeier B (1999). Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache I-III: Design, Optimierung und Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests. Z Audiol 38(1-3):4-15, 44-56, 86-95.
13. Wagener K, Brand T, Kollmeier B (2000). Einfluss verschiedener Parameter auf die Sprachverständlichkeit im Störgeräusch. Fortschritte Akustik DAGA 2000:258-259.