The promotion and evolution of cooperation through projection: Implications for social dilemmas and trust

Journal of Mathematical Sociology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 187-204

  Kanazawa, Yusuke ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Agent based simulation; Cooperation; Prisoner's dilemma game; Projection; Social dilemmas; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947281833     PISSN: 0022250X     EISSN: 15455882     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222500601188502     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
3. Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumption about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1-11.
4. Hayashi, N., Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Yamagishi, T. (1999). Reciprocity, trust, and the sense of control: A cross-societal study. Rationality and Society, 11, 27-46.
5. Kiyonari, T., Tanida, S., & Yamagishi, T. (2000). Social exchange and reciprocity: Confusion or a heuristic. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 411-427.
6. Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183-214.
7. Kramer, R. M. & Brewer, M. B. (1986). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1044-1056.
8. Kruger, J. (1998). On the perception of social consensus. In P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, (pp. 163-240). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9. Macy, M. W. & Sato, Y. (2002). Trust, cooperation, and market formation in the U.S. and Japan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 7214-7220.
10. Macy, M. W. & Skvoretz, J. (1998). The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers: A computational model. American Sociological Review, 63, 638-660.
11. Marks, G. & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72-90.
12. Messick, D. M. & Brewer, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 11-44.
13. Morikawa, T., Orbell, J. M., & Runde, A. S. (1995). The advantage of being moderately cooperative. American Political Science Review, 89, 601-611.
14. Orbell, J. & Dawes, R. M. (1991). A "cognitive miser" theory of cooperator's advantage. American Political Science Review, 85, 515-528.
15. Orbell, J. & Dawes, R. M. (1993). Social welfare, cooperator's advantage, and the option of not playing the game. American Sociological Review, 58, 787-600.
16. Orbell, J., Runde, A. & Morikawa, T. (1996). The robustness of cognitively simple judgment in ecologies of Prisoner's Dilemma games. BioSystems, 37, 81-97.
17. Ostrom, E, (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review, 92, 1-22.
19. Pruitt, D. G. & Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 787-800.
20. Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21. Ross, L., Green, D., & House, P. (1977). The 'false consensus effect": An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
22. Sato, Y. (2002). Trust, assurance, and inequality: A rational choice model of mutual trust. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 26, 1-16.
23. Sato, Y. (2006). Trust and commitment in the market. In O. Kyriakidou & M. F. Ozbilgin, (eds.), Relational Perspectives in Organizational Studies: A Research Companion, (pp. 163-179). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
24. Thibaut, J. W. & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups, New York: Wiley.
25. Watanabe Y. & Yamagishi, T. (1997). When "false consensus" stops being "false": An experimental study with one-shot prisoner's dilemma. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 67, 421-428. (originally in Japanese).
26. Yamagishi, T. (1998). Shinrai no Kouzou [The Structure of Trust: The Evolutionary Game of Mind and Society]. (in Japanese). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
27. Yamagishi, T. (2000). Shakaiteki Jiremma [Social Dilemmas]. (in Japanese). Tokyo: PHP Shinsho.