Turkish suspended affixation

Linguistics

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 311-347

  Kabak, Bariş ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947256230     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/LING.2007.010     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Adamovic, Milan (1985). Konjugationsgeschichte der Türkischen Sprache. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
2. Anderson, Stephen R. (1992). A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bassarak, Armin (2000). On some fusional features in Turkish. In Studies on Turkish and Turkic Language: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, Asli Göksel and Celia Kerslake (eds.), 35-40. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
4. Csató, Eva Á. and Johanson, Lars (1998). Turkish. In The Turkic Languages, Lars Johanson and Evá Ágnes Csató (eds.), 203-235. London and New York: Routledge.
5. Erdal, Marcel (2000). Clitics in Turkish. In Studies on Turkish and Turkic Languages: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, Asli Göksel and Celia Kerslake (eds.), 41-48. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
6. Good, Jeff and Yu, Alan (2005). Morphosyntax of two Turkish subject pronominal paradigms. In Clitic and Affix Combinations: Theoretical Perspectives, Lorie Heggie and Francisco Ordóñez (eds.), 315-341. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
7. Göksel, Asli (2001). The auxiliary verb at the morphology-syntax interface. In The Verb in Turkish, E. Erguvanli-Taylan (ed.), 151-181. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. -(2003). Syntactic head or morphological buffer? The auxiliary verb in Turkish. In Studies in Turkish Linguistics: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, Sumru Özsoy, Eser Erguvanli-Taylan, Ayhan Aksu-Koç, Didar Akar, and Mine Nakipoǧlu-Demiralp (eds.), 49-57. Istanbul: Boǧaziçi University Press.
9. Hameed, Jumah (1985). Lexical phonology and morphology of Modern Standard Turkish. Cahiers linguistiques d'Ottawa 14, 71-95.
10. Hankamer, Jorge (1989). Morphological parsing and the lexicon. In Lexical Representation and Process, William Marslen-Wilson (ed.), 392-408. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Inkelas, Sharon and Orgun, Cemil O. (1995). Level ordering and economy in the lexical phonology of Turkish. Language 71, 763-793.
12. - and Orgun, Cemil O. (1998). Level (non)ordering in recursive morphology: evidence from Turkish. In Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, Steven G. Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari, and Patrick M. Farrell (eds.), 360-410. Stanford: CSLI.
13. Kabak, Bariş and Vogel, Irene (2001). The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology 18, 315-360.
14. Kaisse, Ellen (1985). Some theoretical consequences of stress rules in Turkish. Chicago Linguistics Society 21, 199-209.
15. -(1986). Towards a lexical phonology of Turkish. In A festschrift for Sol Saporta, Michael Brame and Frederick J. Newmeyer (eds.), 231-239. Seattle: Noit Amrofer.
16. Kornfilt, Jaklin (1996). On some copular clitics in Turkish. In ZAS Papers in Linguistics 6, Artemis Alexiadou, Nanna Fuhrhop, Paul Law, and Sylvia Löhken (eds.), 96-114. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.
17. -(1997). Turkish. London: Routledge.
18. Lees, Robert B. (1962). A compact analysis for the Turkish personal morphemes. In American Studies in Altaic Linguistics, Nicholas Poppe (ed.), 141-176. Indiana University Uralic and Altaic Series 13. Bloomington: Indiana University/The Hague: Mouton.
19. Lewis, Geoffrey L. (1967). Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Micelli, Gabrielle and Caramazza, Alfonso (1988). Dissociation of inflectional and derivational morphology. Brain and Language 35(1), 24-65.
21. Orgun, Cemil O. (1995). Flat versus branching morphological structures: the case of suspended affixation. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 21, Jocelyn Ahlers, Leela Bilmers, Joshua S. Guenter, Barbara A. Kaiser, and Ju Namkung (eds.), 252-261. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
22. -(1996). Suspended affixation: a new look at the phonology-morphology interface. In Interfaces in Phonology, Ursula Kleinhenz (ed.), 251-261. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
23. Payne, John R. (1995). Inflecting postpositions in Indic and Kashmiri. In Double Case: Agreement by Suffixaufnahme, Frans Plank (ed.), 283-298. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Plank, Frans (1999). Split morphology: how agglutination and flexion mix. Linguistic Typology 3, 279-340.
25. Sohn, Ho-Min (1999). The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Stump, Gregory T. (1998). Inflection. In Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Spencer and Arnold Zwicky (eds.), 13-43. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
27. -(2001). Inflectional Morphology. A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Underhill, Robert (1976). Turkish Grammar. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
29. Wälchli, Bernhard (2005). Co-Compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Yu, Alan C. and Good, Jeff C. (2000). Morphosyntax of two Turkish subject pronominal paradigms. In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society 30, M. Hirotani, A. Coetzee, N. Hall, and J.-Y. Kim (eds.), 759-773. New Brunswick: Rutgers University.
31. Zwicky, Arnold and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (1983). Cliticization vs. inflection: English n't. Language 59, 502-513.