The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish

Phonology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 315-360

  Kabak, Bariş ^a   Vogel, Irene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33144462027     PISSN: 09526757     EISSN: 14698188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0952675701004201     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Banguoǧlu, T. (1986). Türkçenin grameri. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu
2. Barker, C. (1989). Extrametricality, the cycle, and Turkish word stress. In J. Itô & J. Runner (eds.) Phonology at Santa Cruz 1. Santa Cruz: Linguistics Research Center. 1-33
3. Booij, G. (1988). Review of Nespor & Vogel (1986). JL 24. 515-525
4. Çakir, M. C. (1988). On non-final stress in Turkish simplex words. Paper presented at the 9th International Congress on Turkish Linguistics, Lincoln College, Oxford
5. Clements, G. N. & E. Sezer (1982). Vowel and consonant disharmony in Turkish. In H. van derHulst & N.Smith (eds.) The structure of phonological representations. Part 2. Dordrecht: Foris. 213-255
6. Foster, J. F. (1969). On some phonological rules of Turkish. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana
7. Göksel, A. (in press). The auxiliary verb at the morphology-syntax interface. In E. Taylan (ed.) The verb: the core of clause structure in Turkish. Amsterdam: Benjamins
8. Hameed, J. (1985). Lexical phonology and morphology of Modern Standard Turkish. Cahiers Linguistiques d'Ottawa 14. 71-95
9. Hayes, B. (1989). The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In P. Kiparsky & G. Youmans (eds.) Rhythm and meter. Orlando: Academic Press. 201-260
10. Inkelas, S. (1999). The exceptional stress-attracting suffixes in Turkish: representations versus the grammar. In R. Kager, H. van der Hulst & W. Zonneveld (eds.) The prosody-morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 134-187
11. Inkelas, S. & C. O. Orgun (1995). Level ordering and economy in the lexical phonology of Turkish. Lg 71. 763-793
12. Inkelas, S. & C. O. Orgun (1998). Level (non)ordering in recursive morphology: evidence from Turkish. In S. G. Lapointe, D. K. Brentari & P. M. Farrell (eds.) Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax. Stanford: CSLI. 360-410
13. Kaisse, E. (1985). Some theoretical consequences of stress rules in Turkish. CLS 21:1. 199-209
14. Kaisse, E. (1986). Toward a lexical phonology of Turkish. In M. Brame, H. Contreras & F. Newmeyer (eds.) A Festschrift for Sol Saporta. Seattle: Noit Amrofer. 231-240
15. Kardeştuncer, A. (1982). A three-boundary system for Turkish. Linguistic Analysis 10. 95-117
16. Kornfilt, J. (1984). Case marking, agreement, and empty categories in Turkish. PhD dissertation, Harvard University
17. Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. London & New York: Routledge
18. Lees, R. (1961). The phonology of Modern Standard Turkish. Bloomington: Indiana University
19. Lees, R. (1962). A compact analysis for the Turkish personal morphemes. In N. Poppe (ed.) American studies in Altaic linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University. 141-176
20. Lewis, G. (1967). Turkish grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press
21. McCarthy, J. & A. Prince (1993b). Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993. 79-153
22. Nespor, M. & I. Vogel (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris
23. Nespor, M. & I. Vogel (1989). On clashes and lapses. Phonology 6. 69-116
24. Peperkamp, S. (1997). Prosodic words. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics
25. Selkirk, E. (1980). Prosodic domains in phonology: Sanskrit revisited. In M. Aronoff & M.-L. Kean (eds.) Juncture. Saratoga: Anma Libri. 107-129
26. Selkirk, E. (1995). The prosodic structure of function words. In J. Beckman, L. Walsh Dickey & S. Urbanczyk (eds.) Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst: GLSA. 439-469
27. Sezer, E. (1981). The k/O alternation in Turkish. Harvard studies in phonology 2. 354-382
28. Sezer, E. (1983). On non-final stress in Turkish. Journal of Turkish Studies 5. 61-69
29. Vogel, I. (1999). Subminimal constituents in prosodic phonology. In S. J. Hannahs & M. Davenport (eds.) Issues in phonological structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 249-267
30. Vogel, I., H. T. Bunnell & S. Hoskins (1995). The phonology and phonetics of the Rhythm Rule. In B. Connell & A. Arvaniti (eds.) Phonology and phonetic evidence: papers in laboratory phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 111-127
31. Zec, D. & S. Inkelas (1991). The place of clitics in the prosodic hierarchy. WCCFL 10. 505-519
32. Zimmer, K. E. (1970). Some observations on non-final stress in Turkish. Journal of the American Oriental Society 90. 160-162