Split morphology: How agglutination and flexion mix

Linguistic Typology

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 279-340

  Plank, Frans ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Agglutination; Allomorphy; Case; Cumulation; Flexion; Fusion; Grammaticalization; Inflection classes; Invariance; Markedness; Morphological typology; Number

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947231142     PISSN: 14300532     EISSN: 1613415X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/lity.1999.3.3.279     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Andronov, M. S. (1980). The Brahui Language. Moskva: Nauka.
2. Annamalai, E. & Sanford B. Steever (1998). Modern Tamil. In Steever (ed.)(1998), 100-128.
3. Aristar, Anthony R. (1991). On diachronic sources and synchronic patterns: An investigation into the origins of linguistic universals. Language 67: 1-33.
4. Bergsland, Knut (1976). Lappische Grammatik mit Lesestücken. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Bhat, D. N. S. (1998). Tulu. In Steever (ed.)(1998), 158-177.
5. Bills, Garland D., Bernardo Vallejo C, & Rudolph C. Troike (1969). An Introduction to Spoken Bolivian Quechua. Austin: University of Texas Press.
6. Bobaljik, Jonathan D. (1997). If the head fits ...: On the morphological determination of Germanic syntax. Linguistics 35: 1029-1055.
7. Bouda, Karl (1949). Die Kongruenz im Tungusischen. lndogermanische Forschungen 60: 14-20.
8. Brandi, L. & P. Cordin (1989). Two Italian dialects and the null subject parameter. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir (eds.). The Null Subject Parameter, 111-142. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
9. Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson (1978). Univcrsals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Esther N. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, 56-289, 295-310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Bybee, Joan L. (1985). Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Formmsterdam: Benjamins.
11. - (1988). The diachronic dimension in explanation. In John Hawkins (ed.), Explaining Language Universals, 350-379. Oxford: Blackwell.
12. - (1997). Semantic aspects of morphological typology. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman, & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón, 25-37. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
13. Campbell, A. (1962). Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
14. Campbell, Lyle (1991). Some grammaticalization changes in Estonian and their implications. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. 1: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues, 285-299. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
15. Carstairs, Andrew (1987a). Allomorphy in Inflexion. London: Croom Helm.
16. - (1987b). Diachronic evidence and the affix-clitic distinction. In Anna Giacalone Ramat et al. (eds.). Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 151-162. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
17. Collinder, Björn (1957). Survey of the Uralic Languages. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
18. Comrie, Bernard (1981). Language Unversals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.
19. - (1988). Linguistic typology. In Frederick W. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. 1: Linguistic Theory: Foundations, 447-461. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Comrie, Bernard et al. (1981). The Languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Dixon, R.M.W. (1980). The Languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Dresher, B. Elan & Aditi Lahiri (1991). The Germanic foot: Metrical coherence in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 251-286.
23. Elfenbein, Josef (1998). Brahui. In Steever (ed.)(1998), 388-414.
24. Evans, Nicholas D. (1995). A Grammar of Kayardild, with Historical-Comparative Notes on Tangkic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
25. Fähnrich, Heinz (1986). Kurze Grammatik der georgischen Sprache. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.
26. Flikweert, Margriet (1994). Wat hoor ik -te jou zeggen? Over het verschijnen van een pronomen tussen werkwoordsstam en flexie-morfeem, in kindertaal en enkele Nederlandse dialecten. Doctoraalscriptie, Universiteit Utrecht.
27. Fromm, Hans (1982). Finnische Grammatik. Heidelberg: Winter.
28. Gabelentz, Georg von der (1901). Die Sprachwissenschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. 2nd edition. Leipzig: Tauchnitz.
29. Gildersleeve, B. L. & Gonzalez Lodge (1895). Latin Grammar. 3rd edition. London: Macmillan.
30. Goodwin, William W. (1894). A Greek Grammar. London: Macmillan.
31. Greenberg, Joseph H. (1954). A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of language. In R. F. Spencer (ed.), Method and Perspective in Anthropology: Papers in Honor of Wilson D. Wallis, 192-220. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Reprinted in Greenberg 1990,3-25.)
32. - (1966). Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. (Janua linguarum, Series minor, 54.) The Hague: Mouton.
33. - (1990). On Language. Edited by Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
34. - (1995). The diachronic typological approach to language. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Theodora Bynon (eds.), Approaches to Language Typology, 145-166. Oxford: Clarendon Press
35. Grjunberg, A. L. & I. M. Steblin-Kamenskij (1976). Jazyki vostočnogo Gindukuša: vaxanskij jazyk. Leningrad: Nauka.
36. Haas, Mary R. (1946). A grammatical sketch of Tunica. In Hoijer et al. (1946), 337-366.
37. Halpern, A. L. (1946). Yuma. In Hoijcr et al. (1946), 249-288.
38. Harris, Alice C. (1985). Diachronic Syntax: The Kartvelian Case. (Syntax and Semantics, 18.) Orlando: Academic Press.
39. Haudry, Jean (1980). La "syntaxe des désinences" en indo-européen. Bulletin de la Société deLinguistique de Paris 75-1: 131-166.
40. Heine, Bernd (1997). Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Hoijer, Harry (1946). Tonkawa. In Hoijer et al. (1946), 289-311.
42. Hoijer, Harry et al. (1946), Linguistic Structures of Native America. (Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, 6.) New York: Viking Fund.
43. Holisky, Dee Ann & Rusudan Gagua (1994). Tsova-Tush (Batsbi). In Rieks Smeets (ed.), The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, vol. 4
44. North East Caucasian Languages, Part 2
45. Presenting the Three Nakh Languages and Six Minor Lezgian Languages, 147-212. Delmar, N.Y.: Caravan.
46. Honti, Lászl6 (1997). Fremdes oder Eigenständiges? Zum historischen Hintergrund der Attributivkongruenz in uralischen Sprachcn. In Sirkka-Liisa Hahmo et al. (eds.), Finnisch-ugrische Sprachen in Kontakt, 135-144. Maastricht: Shaker.
47. Janda, Richard D. (1995). From agreement affix to subject "clitic"-and bound root: -mos > -nos vs. (-)nos(-) and nos-otros in New Mexican and other regional Spanish dialects. Chicago Linguistic Society 31-2: 118-139.
48. Jespersen, Otto (1918). Chapters on English. Reprinted in Selected Writings of Otto Jespersen, 153-345. London: Allen & Unwin.
49. - (1934). Gruppegenitiv på Dansk. In Studier tilegnede Verner Dahlenip, 1-7. KoØbcnhavn: Universitetsforlaget i Aarhus.
50. Ka"mpfe, Hans-Rainer & Alexander P. Volodin (1995). Abriβ der Tschuktschischen Grammatik auf der Basis der Schriftsprache. (Tunguso-Sibirica, 1.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
51. Keresztes, László (1997). Mordvinsk morfologi. Lecture notes, Aarhus Universitet.
52. Kibrik, Aleksandr E. (1991). Organising principles for nominal paradigms in Daghestanian languages: Comparative and typological observations. In Plank (ed.) 1991, 255-274.
53. Kiparsky, Paul (1996). Allomorphy or morphophonology? In Rajendra Singh (ed.), Trubetzkoy's Orphan, 12-31. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
54. Knapp, Otto (1902). Die ausbreitung des flektierten genitivs auf -s im mittelenglischen. Englische Studien 31: 20-77.
55. Kozintseva, Natalia (1995). Modem Eastern Armenian. (Languages of the World/Materials, 22.) München: Lincom Europa.
56. Krifka, Manfred (1985). Harmony or consistency? Review of John A. Hawkins, Word Order Universals (1983). Theoretical Linguistics 12: 73-96.
57. Lahiri, Aditi (2000). Conflicting analogical levelling in grammaticalization. In Aditi Lahiri (ed.), Analogy and Markedness: Principles of Phonological and Morphological Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
58. Lehmann, Christian (1985). The role of grammaticalization in linguistic typology. In Hansjakob Seiler & Gunther Brettschneider (eds.), Language Invariants and Mental Operations, 41-52. Tübingen: Narr.
59. - (1986). Grammaticalization and linguistic typology. General Linguistics 26: 3-22.
60. Lehmann, Thomas (1998). Old Tamil. In Steever (ed.)(1998), 75-99.
61. Lewis, Geoffrey L. (1975). Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
62. MacDonald, Lorna (1990). A Grammar of Tauya. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
63. Mahapatra, B. P. (1979). Malto: An Ethnosemantic Study. (Occasional Monographs Series, 15.)
64. Manasagangotri, Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages. Matsumoto, Yo (1988). From bound grammatical markers to free discourse markers: History of some Japanese connectives. In Shelley Axmaker et al. (eds.), Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: 340-351.
65. Mdndez Dosuna, Julián (1997). Fusion, fission, and relevance in language change: De-univerbation in Greek verb morphology. Studies in Language 21: 577-612.
66. Nedjalkov, Igor (1997). Evenki. (Descriptive Grammars.) London: Routledge.
67. Newman, Stanley (1944). Yokuts Language of California. (Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, 2.) New York: Viking Fund.
68. Nichols, Johanna (1994). Chechen. In Rieks Smeets (ed.), The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, vol. 4: North East Caucasian Languages, Part 2, Presenting the Three Nakh Languages and Six Minor Lezgian Languages, 1-77. Delmar, N.Y.: Caravan.
69. Noonan, Michael et al. (1999). Chantyal Dictionary and Texts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
70. Norde, Muriel (1997). The history of the genitive in Swedish: A case study in degrammaticalization. Ph. D. dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
71. Okrand, Marc (1977). Mutsun grammar. Ph. D. dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
72. Payne, John (1989). Pāmir languages. In Rüdiger Schmitt (ed.), Compendium linguarum iranicarum, 417-444. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
73. Plank, Frans (1982). Conditioning at a distance and variable ordering in morphology. Unpublished,Universität Konstanz.
74. - (1985). The interpretation and development of form alternations conditioned across word boundaries: The case of wife's, wives, and wives'. In Roger Eaton et al. (eds.), Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, 205-233. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
75. - (1986). Paradigm size, morphological typology, and universal economy. Folia Linguistica 20: 29-48.
76. - (1991). Of abundance and scantiness in inflection: A typological prelude. In Plank (ed.) 1991, 1-39.
77. - (1992a). Adam Smith: Grammatical economist. In Peter Jones & Andrew S. Skinner (eds.), Adam Smith Reviewed, 21-55. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
78. - (1992b). Language and earth as recycling machines. In Bernd Naumann, Frans Plank, & Gottfried Hofbauer (eds.), Language and Earth: Elective Affinities between the Emerging Sciences of Linguistics and Geology, 221-269. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
79. - (1992c). From cases to adpositions. In Nicola Pantaleo (ed.), Aspects of English Diachronic Linguistics, 17-61. Fasano: Schena.
80. - (1995a). (Re-)Introducing Suffixaufnahme. In Plank (ed.) 1995, 3-110.
81. - (1995b). Entgrammatisierung-Spiegelbildjler Grammatisierung? In Norbert Boretzky et al. (eds.), Natiirlichkeitstheorie und Sprachwandel, 199-219. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
82. - (1998). The co-variation of phonology with morphology and syntax: A hopeful history. Linguistic Typology 2: 195-230.
83. - (1999a). Typology and change: A question of responsibility. Paper at the 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver.
84. - (1999b). The place and origin of question markers. Unpublished, Univcrsität Konstanz.
85. - (2000). Typology by the end of the 18th century. In Sylvain Auroux et al. (eds.), Handbook for the History of the Language Sciences. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
86. Plank, Frans (ed.) (1991). Paradigms: The Economy of Inflection. Berlin: Mouton.
87. - (1995). Double Case: Agreement by Suffixaufnahme. New York: Oxford University Press.
88. Plank, Frans & Elena Filimonova (2000). The Universals Archive: A brief introduction for prospective users. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 53: 97-111.
89. Plank, Frans & Wolfgang Schellinger (2000). Dual laws in (no) time. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 53: 46-52.
90. Primus, Beatrice (1987). Grammatische Hierarchien. München: Fink.
91. Sapir, Edward (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt.
92. Schmitt, Rüdiger (1981). Grammatik des Klassisch-Armenischen mit sprachvergleichenden Er-läuterungen. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.
93. Sims-Williams, Nicholas (1982). The double system of nominal inflexion in Sogdian. Transactions of the Philological Society 1982: 67-76.
94. Skalička, Vladimír (1979). Typologische Studien. Braunschweig: Vieweg.
95. Skorik, Petr Ja. (1961). Grammatika čukotskogo jazyka. Vol. 1. Moskva: Nauka.
96. Spagnoletti, Carmela & Marc Dominicy (1992). L'accent italien et la cliticisation de la terminaison verbale no. Revue québécoise de linguistique 21: 9-31.
97. Spencer, Andrew (1991). Morphological Theory: An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
98. Steever, Sanford B. (ed.) (1998). The Dravidian Languages. London: Routledge.
99. Subrahmanyam, P. S. (1998). Kolami. In Steever (ed.)(1998), 301-327.
100. Thomsen, Marie-Louise (1984). The Sumerian Language: An Introduction to its History and Grammatical Structure. København: Akademisk Forlag.
101. Thráinsson, Höskuldur (1998). Infinitival complements in some old and modern Germanic languages. In John Ole Askedal (ed.), Historische germanische und deulsche Syntax, 335-363. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
102. Tompa, József (1968). Ungarische Grammatik. The Hague: Mouton.
103. Unbegaun, Boris O. (1969). Russische Grammatik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
104. Wentzel, Tatjana W. (1980). Die Zigeunersprache (Nordrussischer Dialekt). Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.
105. Werner, Heinrich (1997). Die ketische Sprache. (Tunguso-Sibirica, 3.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
106. Winter, Werner (1967). A note on cases. In For Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, vol. 3, 2250-2253. The Hague: Mouton.
107. Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich (1984). Flexionsmorphologie und Nalürlichkeit: Ein Beilrag zur mor-phologischen Theoriebildung. (studia grammatica, 21.) Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
108. - (1995). Alterserschcinungen in der Morphologic In Norbert Boretzky et al. (eds.), Natür-lichkeitstheorie und Sprachwandel, 67-91. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
109. - (1996). Morphologischer Strukturwandel: Typologischc Entwicklungen im Deutschen. In Ewald Lang & Gisela Zifonun (eds.), Deutsch - typologisch, 492-524. Berlin: De Gruyter.