Behavioural compensation by drivers of a simulator when using a vision enhancement system

Ergonomics

Volumn 43, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 1359-1370

  Stanton, Neville A ^a   Pinto, Marcel ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Driving; RHT; Simulation; Vision enhancement

Indexed keywords

ABILITY TESTING; AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; VISION;

BEHAVIORAL COMPENSATION; VISION ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; DRIVER; ERGONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; VISUAL AID;

EID: 0033827897     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/001401300421806     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Dingus, T. A., Hulse, M. C., Mollenhauser, M. A., Fleischman, R. N., McGehee, D. V. and Manakkal, N. 1997a, a Effects of age, system experience, and navigation techniques on driving with an advanced traveller information system, Human Factors, 39, 177-199.
2. Dingus, T. A., McGehee, D. V., Manakkal, N., Jahns, S. K., Carney, C. and Hankey, J. M. 1997b, Human factors field evaluation of automotive headway maintenance/collision warning devices, Human Factors, 39, 216-229.
3. Glendon, A. I., Hoyes, T. W., Haigney, D. E. and Taylor, R. G. 1996, A review of risk homeostasis theory in simulated environments, Safety Science, 22, 15-25.
4. Heino, A., Van der Molen, H. H. and Wilde, G. J. S. 1996, Risk perception, risk taking, accident involvement and the need for simulation, Safety Science, 22, 35-48.
5. Hoyes, T. W., Stanton, N. A. and Taylor, R. G. 1996, Risk homeostasis theory: a study of intrinsic compensation, Safety Science, 22, 77-86.
6. Hoyos, C. G. 1988, Mental load and risk in traffic behaviour, Ergonomics, 31, 571-584.
7. Jackson, J. S. H. and Blackman, R. 1994, A driving-simulator test of Wilde’s risk homeostasis theory, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 950-958.
8. Jackson, P. G. 1988, In search of better route guidance instructions, Ergonomics, 41, 1000-1013.
9. Johnson, G. 1998, Book review: Ergonomics and Safety of Intelligent Driver Interfaces, edited by Y. I. Noy. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum (1997), Ergonomics, 41, 1082-1083.
10. McKenna, F. P. 1988, What role should the concept of risk play in theories of accident involvement?, Ergonomics, 31, 469-481.
11. Muir, B. M. and Moray, N. 1996, Trust in automation: Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in process control simulation, Ergonomics, 39, 429-460.
12. Nilsson, L. 1995, Safety effects of adaptive cruise control in critical traffic situations, in Proceedings of the Second World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems: ‘Steps Forward, vol. 3 (Yokohama: VERTIS), 1254-1259.
13. Noy, Y. I. (ed.) 1997, Ergonomics and Safety of Intelligent Driver Interfaces (New Jersey: Erlbaum).
14. Senders, A. F. 1991, Simulation as a tool in the measurement of human performance, Ergonomics, 34, 995-1025.
15. Srinivasan, R. and Jovanis, P. P. 1997, Effect of selected in-vehicle route guidance systems on driver reaction times, Human Factors, 39, 200-215.
16. Stanton, N. A. 1996, Simulators: research and practice, in N. A. Stanton (ed.), Human Factors in Nuclear Safety (London: Taylor & Francis), 117-140.
17. Stanton, N. A. and Glendon, A. I. 1996, Risk homeostasis and risk assessment, Safety Science, 22, 1-13.
18. Stanton, N. A. and Marsden, P. 1996, From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: safety implications of vehicle automation, Safety Science, 24, 35-49.
19. STANTON, N. A. and YOUNG, M. S. 1998, VEHICLE AUTOMATION AND DRIVING PERFORMANCE, Ergonomics, 41, 1014-1028.
20. Stanton, N. A., Young, M. and McCaulder, B. 1997, Drive-by-wire: the case of driver workload and reclaiming control with Adaptive Cruise Control, Safety Science, 27, 149-159.
21. Trimpop, R. M. 1996, Risk homeostasis theory: problems of the past and promises for the future, Safety Science, 22, 119-130.
22. Ward, N. J. and Wilde, G. J. S. 1996, Driver approach behaviour at an unprotected railway crossing before and after enhancement of lateral sight distances: an experimental investigation of a risk perception and behavioural compensation hypothesis, Safety Science, 22, 63-75.
23. Wilde, G. J. S. 1982, The theory of risk homeostasis: implications for safety and health, Risk Analysis, 2, 209-225.
24. Wilde, G. J. S. 1994, Target Risk (Toronto: PDE).
25. Young, M. and Stanton, N. A. 1997, Automotive automation: implications for driver mental workload, International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 1, 325-336.