Modeling individual differences in contrapositive reasoning with continuous latent state and trait variables

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 42, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1403-1413

  Bonnefon, Jean François ^a   Vautier, Stéphane ^b   Eid, Michael ^c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE JEAN JAURÈS   (France)

^c FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contrapositive; Latent state; Latent trait; Reasoning; Reliability; Specificity; Stability

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947161069     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.017     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bonnefon J.F., and Hilton D.J. Consequential conditionals: invited and suppressed inferences from valued outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 30 (2004) 28-37
2. De Neys W., Schaeken W., and d'Ydewalle G. Causal conditional reasoning and semantic memory retrieval: a test of the semantic memory framework. Memory and Cognition 30 (2002) 908-920
3. Geis M.L., and Zwicky A. On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiries 2 (1971) 561
4. Heim A.W. AH5 group test of intelligence [manual] (1968), National Foundation for Educational Research, London
5. Kahneman D., Slovic P., and Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases (1982), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
6. Klaczynski P.A. Analytic and heuristic processing influences on adolescent reasoning and decision making. Child Development 72 (2001) 844-861
7. Koehler J.J. The base rate fallacy reconsidered: descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1996) 153
8. Muthén L.K., and Muthén B.O. Mplus 3.11 [Computer software] (2004), Muthén and Muthén, Los Angeles (CA)
9. Newstead S.E., Handley S.J., Harley C., Wright H., and Farelly D. Individual differences in deductive reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 57 (2004) 3360
10. Oaksford M., and Chater N. A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review 101 (1994) 608-631
11. Pacini R., and Epstein S. An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (1999) 972-987
12. Politzer G. Reasoning, judgement, and pragmatics. In: Noveck I., and Sperber D. (Eds). Experimental pragmatics (2004), Palgrave, London 94-115
13. Politzer G., and Bonnefon J.F. Two varieties of conditionals and two kinds of defeaters help reveal two fundamental types of reasoning. Mind & Language 21 (2006) 484-503
14. Rijmen F., and De Boeck P. A latent class model for individual differences in the interpretation of conditionals. Psychological Research 67 (2003) 219-231
15. Stanovich K.E. Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (NJ)
16. Stanovich K.E., and West R.F. Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127 (1998) 161-188
17. Stanovich K.E., and West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2000) 645-665
18. Steyer R. Models of classical psychometric test theory as stochastic measurement models: Representation, uniqueness, meaningfulness, identifiability, and testability. Methodika 3 (1989) 25-60
19. Steyer R., Ferring D., and Schmitt M.J. States and traits in psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 8 (1992) 79-98
20. Steyer R., Schmitt M.J., and Eid M. Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality 13 (1999) 389-408
21. Thompson V.A. The task-specific nature of domain-general reasoning. Cognition 76 (2000) 209-268
22. Torrens D., Thompson V.A., and Cramer K.M. Individual differences and the belief bias effect: mental models, logical necessity, and abstract reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 5 (1999) 128
23. Wason P. Reasoning. In: Foss B.M. (Ed). New horizons in psychology (1966), Penguin, Harmandsworth (UK) 106-137