Molecular evolution of satellite DNA repeats and speciation of lizards of the genus Darevskia (Sauria: Lacertidae)

Genome

Volumn 49, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1297-1307

  Grechko, Vernata V ^a   Ciobanu, Doina G ^b   Darevsky, Ilya S ^c   Kosushkin, Sergey A ^a   Kramerov, Dmitri A ^a  

^a ENGELHARDT INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^b INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Moldova)

^c ZOOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Caucasus; Darevskia; Lizards; Phylogeography; Reticulate speciation; Satellites; Tandem DNA repeats

Indexed keywords

SATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AZERBAIJAN; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; LIZARD; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; RUSSIAN FEDERATION;

ANIMALS; AZERBAIJAN; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA, SATELLITE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; LIZARDS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; PHYLOGENY; RUSSIA;

DAREVSKIA; DAREVSKIA DERJUGINI; DAREVSKIA LINDHOLMI; DAREVSKIA PARVULA; DAREVSKIA PRATICOLA; LACERTA; LACERTIDAE; PETROSAURUS; SAURIA; SAXICOLA; SQUAMATA; TEIIDAE;

EID: 33847757181     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/G06-089     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., and Lipman, D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Evol. 215: 403-410.
2. Arnold, E.N. 1989. Towards a phylogeny and biogeography of the Lacertidae: relationships within an Old-World family of lizards derived from morphology. Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Zool. 55: 209-257.
3. Arnold, M. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, NewYork.
4. Arribas, O.E. 1999. Phylogeny and relationships of mountain lizards of Europe and near East (Archaeolacerta Mertens, 1921, sensu lato) and their relationships among the Eurasian lacertid radiation. Russ. J. Herpetol. 6: 1-22.
5. Avise, J.C. 2004. Molecular markers, natural history, and evolution. 2nd ed. Sinauer Ass., Inc. Publishers, Sunderland, Mass.
6. Barton, N.H. 2001. The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol. Ecol. 10: 551-568. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01216.x.
7. Baum, B.R., Johnson, B.A., and Bailey, L.G. 2001. Defining orthologous groups among multicopy genes prior to inferring phylogeny, with species emphasis on the Triticeae. Hereditas, 135: 123-138. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.2001. 00123.x.
8. Berg, L.S. 1952. Geographical zones of the Soviet Union. Mountain Caucasus (Russ). State Geographic Literature Company, Moscow.
9. Bermingham, E., and Moritz, C. 1998. Comparative phylogeography: concepts and applications. Mol. Ecol. 7(4): 367-369.
10. Blake, R.D., Wang, J.Z., and Beauregard, L. 1997. Repetitive sequence families of Alces alces americana. J. Mol. Evol. 44: 509-520. doi:10.1007/PL00006175.
11. Boldogkoi, Z. 2004. Gene network polymorphism is the raw material of natural selection: the selfish gene network hypothesis. J. Mol. Evol. 59: 340-357.
12. Brodskii, L.I., Ivanov, V.V., Kalaidzidis, Ia.L., Leontovich, A.M., Nikolaev, V.K., Feranchuk, S.I., and Drachev, V.A. 1995. GeneBee NET: internet based server for analyzing biopolymers structure. Biokhimiia, 60(8): 1221-1230. [In Russian.]
13. Bullini, L. 1994. Origin and evolution of animal hybrid species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9(11): 422-425.
14. Capriglione, T., De Santo, M.G., Odierna, G., and Olmo, E. 1998. An alphoid-like satellite DNA sequence is present in the genome of lacertid lizards. J. Mol. Evol. 46: 240-244. doi:10.1007/PL00006299.
15. Carranza, S., Arnold, E.N., and Amat, F. 2004. DNA phylogeny of lacerta (Iberolacerta) and other lacertine lizards (Reptilia: Lacertidae); did competition cause long-term restriction? Systematics and Biodiversity, 2: 57-77. doi:10.1017/S1477200004001355.
16. Charlesworth, B., Sniegowski, P., and Stephan, W. 1994. The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature (London), 371: 215-220. doi:10.1038/371215a0.
17. Ciobanu, D., Roudykh, I.A., Ryabinina, N.L., Grechko, V.V., Kramerov, D.A., and Darevsky, I.S. 2002. Reticulate evolution of parthenospecies of the lacertid rock lizards: inheritance of CLsat tandem repeats and anonymous RAPD markers. Mol. Biol. (Moscow), 36: 223-231.
18. Ciobanu, D.G., Grechko, V.V., and Darevsky, I.S. 2003. Molecular evolution of satellite DNA in lizards from the genus Darevskia (Sauria: Lacertidae): correlation with species diversity. Russ. J. Genet. 39: 1527-1541.
19. Ciobanu, D.G., Grechko, V.V., Darevsky, I.S., and Kramerov, D.A. 2004. New satellite DNA in Lacerta s. str. lizards (Sauria: Lacertidae): evolutionary pathways and phylogenetic impact. J. Exp. Zool. 302B: 505-516. doi:10.1002/jez.b.21014.
20. Comings, D.E. 1998. Polygenic inheritance and micro/minisatellites. Mol. Psychiatry, 3: 21-31. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4000289.
21. Csink, A.K., and Henikoff, S. 1998. Something from nothing: the evolution and utility of satellite repeats. Trends Genet. 14: 200-204. doi:10.1016/S0168-9525(98)01444-9.
22. Darevsky, I.S. 1967. Skal'nye yashzeritsy Kavkasa (Caucasian rock lizards). Nauka, Leningrad. [In Russian.]
23. Dimitri, P., and Junakovic, N. 1999. Revising of selfish DNA hypothesis: new evidence on accumulation of transposable elements in heterochromatin. Trends Genet. 15: 123-124. doi:10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01711-4.
24. Doolittle, W.F., and Sapienza, C. 1980. Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature (London), 284: 601-603. doi:10.1038/284601a0.
25. Dowling, T.E., and Secor, C.L. 1997. The role of hybridization and introgression in the diversification on animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 593-619. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.593.
26. Elder, J.F., Jr., and Turner, B.J. 1995. Concerted evolution of repetitive DNA sequences in eukaryotes. Q. Rev. Biol. 70(3): 275-320.
27. Fedorov, A.N., Fedorova, L.V., Grechko, V.V., Ryabinin, D.M., Sheremet'eva, V.A., Bannikova, A.A. et al. 1999. Variable and invariable repeats characters revealed by taxonprint approach are useful for molecular systematics. J. Mol. Evol. 48: 69-76.
28. Felsenstein, J. 1989. PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package. Version 3.2 [computer program]. Cladistics, 5: 164-166.
29. FitzSimmons, N.N., Moritz, C., and Moore, S.S. 1995. Conservation and dynamics of microsatellite loci over 300 million years of marine turtle evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12: 432-440.
30. Fontdevila, A. 2005. Hybrid genome evolution by transposition. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 110: 49-55. doi:10.1159/000084937.
31. Fu, J. 2000. Toward the phylogeny of the family Lacertidae - why 4798 base pairs of mtDNA sequences cannot draw the picture. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 71: 203-217. doi:10.1006/bijl.1999.0431.
32. Grechko, V.V. 2002. Molecular markers in phylogeny and systematics. Russ. J. Genet. 38: 851-868. doi:10.1023/A:1016890509443.
33. Grechko, V.V., Fedorova, L.V., Fedorov, N.A., Slobodyanyuk, S.Y., Ryabinin, D.M., Melnikova, M.N., et al. 1997. Restriction endonuclease analysis of highly repetitive DNA as a phylogenetic tool. J. Mol. Evol. 45: 332-336. doi:10.1007/PL00006237.
34. Grechko, V.V., Ryabinin, D.M., Fedorova, L.V., Rudykh, I.A., Fedorov, A.N., Ryskov, A.P., et al. 1998. Molecular genetical classification and phylogenetic relationships of some lizard species of the fam. Lacertidae studied by investigation of restriction sites distribution in repetitive DNA (taxonoprint). Mol. Biol. (Moscow), 32: 172-183.
35. Harris, D.J., Arnold, E.N., and Thomas, R.H. 1998. Relationships of the lacertid lizards (Reptilia: Lacertidae) estimated from mitochondrial DNA sequences and morphology. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 265(1409): 1939-1948.
36. Hewitt, G.M. 2004. Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the quaternary. Phylos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 359: 183-195.
37. Korochkin, L.I. 2002. The relationships between ontogeny and phylogeny in the light of genetics: the problem of macromutations (morphological and molecular aspects). Russ. J. Genet. 38: 727-738.
38. McCulloch, R.D., Fu, J., Darevsky, I.S., and Murphy, R. 2000. Genetic evidence for species status of some Caucasian rock lizards in the Darevskia saxicola group. Amphib.-reptil. 21: 169-176. doi:10.1163/ 156853800507354.
39. Mayer, W., and Arribas, O. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of the European lacertid genera Archaeolacerta and Iberolacerta and their relationships to some other "Archaeolacertae" (sensu lato) from near East, derived from mitochondrial DNA sequences. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 41: 151-161.
40. Miclos, G.L.G. 1985. Localized highly repetitive DNA sequences in vertebrate and invertebrate genome. In Molecular evolutionary genetics. Edited by R.J. McIntyre. Plenum, New York. pp. 241-321.
41. Milinkovitch, M.C. 1995. Molecular phylogeny of cetaceans prompts revision of morphological transformations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 328-334. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89120-X.
42. Modi, W.S., Ivanov, S., and Gallagher, D.S. 2004. Concerted evolution and higher-order repeat structure of the 1.709 (SatIV) family in Bovids. J. Mol. Evol. 58: 460-465.
43. Murphy, R.W., Fu, J., MacCulloch, R.D., Darevsky, I.S., and Kupriyanova, L.A. 2000. A fine line between sex and unisexuality: the phylogenetic constraints on parthenogenesis in lacertid lizards. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 130: 527-549. doi:10.1006/zjls.1999.0241.
44. Nowak, R. 1994. Mining treasures from "junk" DNA. Science, 263: 608-610.
45. Orgel, L.E., and Crick, F.-H.C. 1980. Selfish DNA: an ultimate parasite. Nature (London), 284: 604-607. doi:10.1038/284604a0.
46. Ohno, S. 1972. So much "junk" DNA in our genome. In Evolution of genetic systems. Edited by H.H. Smith. Gordon and Breach, New York. pp. 366-370.
47. Orlova, V.F. 1978. Geographic distribution and interspecies polymorphism of meadows lizards in Caucasus. Proc Zool Museum Lomonosov Moscow State University: studies of the USSR fauna. Birds and Reptiles, 17: 188-203.
48. Pons, J., and Gillespie, R.G. 2004. Evolution of satellite DNA in a radiation of endemic Hawaiian spiders: does concerted evolution of highly repetitive sequences reflect evolutionary history? J. Mol. Evol. 59: 632-641. doi:10.1007/s00239-004-2655-2.
49. Robles, F., de la Herran, R., Ludwig, A., Ruiz Rejon, C., Ruiz Rejon, M., and Garrido-Ramos, M.A. 2004. Evolution of ancient satellite DNAs in sturgeon genome. Gene, 338(1): 133-142.
50. Roudykh, I.A., Grechko, V.V., Kramerov, D.A., and Darevsky, I.S. 1999. Distribution of the HindIII repeats in the genomes of Caucasian lacertids of the Lacerta genus reflects their phylogenetic relatedness. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. 367: 364-367.
51. Roudykh, I.A., Grechko, V.V., Ciobanu, D.G., Kramerov, D.A., and Darevsky, I.S. 2002. Variability of restriction sites in satellite DNA as a molecular basis of taxonoprint method: from the study of Caucasian rock lizards. Russ. J. Genet. 38: 937-941. doi:10.1023/A:1016839929007.
52. Ryabinina, N.L., Grechko, V.V., and Darevsky, I.S. 1998. Polymorphism of RAPD markers in lizard populations of family Lacertidae. Russ. J. Genet. 34: 1415-1422.
53. Ryabinina, N.L., Bannikova, A.A., Kosushkin, S.A., Ciobanu, D.G., Milto, K.D., Tuniyev, B.S., et al. 2002. Estimation of the specific level of differentiation in Caucasian lizards of the genus Darevskia (syn. "Lacerta saxicola complex", Lacertidae, Sauria) using genome DNA markers. Russ. J. Herpetol. 9: 185-194.
54. Sambrook, I., Fritsch, E.F., and Maniatis, T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Lab., Cold Spring Harbor press, New York.
55. Taberlet, P., and Cheddadi, R. 2002. Ecology. Quaternary refugia and persistence of biodiversity. Science (Washington, D.C.), 297(5589): 2009-2010.
56. Trifonov, E.N. 1999. Elucidating sequence code: three codes for evolution. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 870: 330-338.
57. Uzzell, T., and Darevsky, I.S. 1975. Biochemical evidence for the hybrid origin of the parthenogenetic species of Lacerta saxicola complex (Sauria, Lacertidae) with a discussion of some ecological and evolutionary implications. Copeia, 1975: 204-222.
58. Vergnaud, G., and Denoeud, F. 2000. Minisatellites mutability and genome architecture. Genome Res. 10: 899-907.
59. Wiedegren, B., Arnason, U., and Akusjavari, G. 1985. Characterization of a conserved 1,579-bp highly repetitive component in the killer whale Orcinus orca. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2: 411-419.
60. Zuckerkandl, E. 1992. Revisiting junk DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 34: 259-271.