T2 relaxation time in patellar cartilage - Global and regional reproducibility at 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla;T2-relaxationszeit am patellaknorpel - Globale und regionale reproduzierbarkeit bei 1,5 Tesla und 3 Tesla

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 179, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 146-152

  Glaser, C ^a   Horng, Annie ^a   Mendlik, T ^a   Weckbach, S ^a   Hoffmann, R T ^a   Wagner, S ^a   Raya, J G ^a   Horger, W ^b   Reiser, M ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cartilage; Precision; Reproducibility; T2 relaxation time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARTILAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING SYSTEM; MALE; PATELLA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RELAXATION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PATELLA; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 33847753081     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-927203     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Eckstein F, Closer C. Measuring cartilage morphology with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2004; 8: 329-353
2. Glaser C. New techniques for cartilage imaging: T2 relaxation time and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2005; 43: 641-653
3. Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ. Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2004; 8: 355-368
4. Lusse S, Claassen H, Gehrke T et al. Evaluation of water content by spatially resolved transverse relaxation times of human articular cartilage. Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 18: 423-430
5. Goodwin DW, Zhu H, Dunn JF. In vitro MR imaging of hyaline cartilage: correlation with scanning electron microscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 405-409
6. Nieminen MT, Rieppo J, Toyras J et al. T2 relaxation reveals spatial collagen architecture in articular cartilage: a comparative quantitative MRI and polarized light microscopic study. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 487-493
7. Nissi MJ. T2 Relaxation Reveals Differences in Spatial Collagen Network Anisotropy in Human, Bovine and Porcine Articular Cartilage. 11th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition, Abstract No. 54. Toronto: ISMRM, 2003
8. Schäfer FK, Muhle C, Heller M et al. Gelenkknorpel in der MR-Tomographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2001; 173: 279-88
9. Kaufman JH, Regatte RR, Bolinger L et al. A novel approach to observing articular cartilage deformation in vitro via magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9: 653-662
10. Menezes NM, Gray ML, Hartke JR et al. T2 and T1rho MRI in articular cartilage systems. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 503-509
11. Nieminen MT, Toyras J, Laasanen MS at al. Prediction of biomechanical properties of articular cartilage with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. J Biomech 2004; 37: 321-328
12. Nieminen MT, Toyras J, Rieppo J et al. Quantitative MR microscopy of enzymatically degraded articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43: 676-681
13. Watrin-Pinzano A, Ruaud JP, Olivier P et al. Effect of proteoglycan depletion on T2 mapping in rat patellar cartilage. Radiology 2005; 234: 162-170
14. Wayne JS, Kraft KA, Shields KJ et al. MR imaging of normal and matrix-depleted cartilage: correlation with biomechanical function and biochemical composition. Radiology 2003; 228: 493-499
15. David-Vaudey E, Ghosh S, Ries M et al. T2 relaxation time measurements in osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 22: 673-682
16. Mlynarik V, Trattnig S, Huber M et al. The role of relaxation times in monitoring proteoglycan depletion in articular cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 497-502
17. Nissi MJ, Toyras J, Laasanen MS et al. Proteoglycan and collagen sensitive MRI evaluation of normal and degenerated articular cartilage. J Orthop Res 2004; 22: 557-564
18. Spandonis Y, Heese FP, Hall LD. High resolution MRI relaxation measurements of water in the articular cartilage of the meniscectomized rat knee at 4.7 T. Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 22: 943-951
19. Watrin-Pinzano A, Ruaud JP, Cheli Yat al. T2 mapping: an efficient MR quantitative technique to evaluate spontaneous cartilage repair in rat patella. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004; 12: 191-200
20. Frank LR, Wong EC, Luh WM et al. Articular cartilage in the knee: mapping of the physiologic parameters at MR imaging with a local gradient coil - preliminary results. Radiology 1999; 210: 241-246
21. Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ, Smith MB. Human articular cartilage: influence of aging and early symptomatic degeneration on the spatial variation of T2 - preliminary findings at 3 T. Radiology 2000; 214: 259-266
22. Gold GE, Han E, Stainsby J et al. Musculoskeletal MRI at 3. 0 T: relaxation times and image contrast. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 343-351
23. Baker Jr. CL, Ferguson CM. Future treatment of osteoarthritis. Orthopedics 2005; 28: s227-234
24. Smith GD, Knutsen G, Richardson JB. A clinical review of cartilage repair techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 445-449
25. Schröder RJ, Boack DH, Nekwasil SJ et al. Diagnostische Wertigkeit der MR-tomographischen Knorpelläsionsdarstellung im Vergleich mit der intraoperativen Arthroskopie bei Calcaneusfrakturen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 367-374
26. Stork A, Kemper J, Priemel M et al. Evaluation experimenteller Knorpeldefekte mit der ultrahochauflösenden Mehrzeilen-CT im Vergleich zur Histologie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 746-751
27. Gluer CC, Blake G, Lu Y et al. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 1995; 5: 262-270
28. Liess C, Lusse S, Karger N et al. Detection of changes in cartilage water content using MRI T2-mapping in vivo. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002; 10: 907-913
29. Mosher TJ. Reproducibility of In Vivo Cartilage T2 Profiles: Implication for Longitudinal Studies. 9th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition, Abstract No. 2097. Glasgow: ISMRM, 2001
30. Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W et al. Double Echo Steady State (DESS) Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Knee Articular Cartilage at 3 Tesla - a Pilot Study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 433-441
31. Eckstein F, Tieschky M, Faber SC et al. Effect of physical exercise on cartilage volume and thickness in vivo: MR imaging study. Radiology 1998; 207: 243-248
32. Mosher TJ, Smith HE, Collins C et al. Change in knee cartilage T2 at MR imaging after running: a feasibility study. Radiology 2005; 234: 245-249
33. Burgkart R, Glaser C, Hyhlik-Durr A et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44: 2072-2077
34. Glaser C, Faber S, Eckstein F et al. Optimization and validation of a rapid high-resolution T1-w 3D FLASH water excitation MRI sequence for the quantitative assessment of articular cartilage volume and thickness. Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 19: 177-185
35. Graichen H, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Vogl T et al. Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 811-816
36. Mendlik T, Faber SC, Weber J et al. T2 quantitation of human articular cartilage in a clinical setting at 1.5 T: implementation and testing of four multiecho pulse sequence designs for validity. Invest Radiol 2004; 39: 288-299
37. Poon CS, Henkelman RM. Practical T2 quantitation for clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992; 2: 541-553
38. Eckstein F, Reiser M, Englmeier KH et al. In vivo morphometry and functional analysis of human articular cartilage with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging-from image to data, from data to theory. Anat Embryol 2001; 203: 147-173
39. Muensterer OJ, Eckstein F, Hahn D et al. Computer-aided three dimensional assessment of knee-joint cartilage with magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Biomech 1996; 11: 260-266
40. Stammberger T, Eckstein F, Englmeier KH et al. Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: computational method and reproducibility in the living. Magn Reson Med 1999; 41: 529-536
41. Schröder RJ, Fischbach F, Unterhauser FN et al. Wertigkeit verschiedener MR-Sequenzen bei einer Feldstärke von 1,5- und 3,0 Tesla für die Analyse von Knorpeldefekten der Patella im Tiermodell. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1667-1675
42. Hone J, Faber S, Muehlbauer R et al. Three-dimensional analysis and visualization of regional MR signal intensity distribution of articular cartilage. Med Eng Phys 2002; 24: 219-27
43. Mosher TJ, Collins CM, Smith HE et al. Effect of gender on in vivo cartilage magnetic resonance imaging T2 mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19: 323-328
44. Van Breuseghem I, Bosnians HT, Elst LV et al. T2 mapping of human femorotibial cartilage with turbo mixed MR imaging at 1.5 T: feasibility. Radiology 2004; 233: 609-614
45. Clark JM. Variation of collagen fiber alignment in a joint surface: a scanning electron microscope study of the tibial plateau in dog, rabbit, and man. J Orthop Res 1991; 9: 246-257
46. Clark JM, Norman A, Notzli H. Postnatal development of the collagen matrix in rabbit tibial plateau articular cartilage. J Anat 1997; 191: 215-221
47. Mosher TJ. Imaging of rheumatoid arthritis: can MR imaging be used to monitor cellular response of disease? Radiology 2004; 233: 1-2
48. Dardzinski BJ, Mosher TJ, Li S et al. Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage. Radiology 1997; 205: 546-550