Effect of physical exercise on cartilage volume and thickness in vivo: MR imaging study

Radiology

Volumn 207, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 243-248

  Eckstein, Felix ^a,b   Tieschky, Marcus ^a,b   Faber, Sonja C ^b   Haubner, Michael ^c   Kolem, Heiner ^d   Englmeier, Karl Hans ^c   Reiser, Maximilian ^b  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^d SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cartilage; Cartilage, MR; Magnetic resonance (MR), three dimensional; Magnetic resonance (MR), volume measurement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARTILAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IN VIVO STUDY; KNEE FUNCTION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATELLA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REST; THICKNESS; VOLUMETRY;

EID: 0031961129     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.207.1.9530322     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Peterfy CG, van Dijke DF, Janzen DL, et al. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. Radiology 1994; 192:485-491.
2. Marshall KW, Mikulius DJ, Guthrie JM. Quantitation of articular cartilage using magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction. J Orthop Res 1995; 13:814-823.
3. Peterfy CG, Dijke DF, Lu Y, et al. Quantification of the volume of articular cartilage in the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hand: accuracy and precision of three-dimensional MR imaging. AJR 1995; 165: 371-375.
4. Piplani MA, Disler DG, McCauley TR, Holmes TJ, Cousins JP. Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semiautomatic determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images. Radiology 1996; 198:855-859.
5. Eckstein F, Sittek H, Gavazzeni A, et al. Magnetic resonance chondro-crassometry (MR-CCM): a method for accurate determination of articular cartilage thickness? Magn Reson Med 1996; 35:89-96.
6. Eckstein F, Gavazzeni A, Sittek H, et al. Determination of knee joint cartilage thickness using three dimensional magnetic resonance chondro-crassometry (3D MR-CCM). Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 256-265.
7. Eckstein F, Adam C, Sittek H, et al. Non-invasive determination of cartilage thickness throughout joint surfaces using magnetic resonance imaging. J Biomech 1997; 30:285-289.
8. Mow VC, Holmes MH, Lai WM. Fluid transport and mechanical properties of articular cartilage: a review. J Biomech 1984; 17:377-394.
9. Akizuki S, Mow VC, Muller F, Pita JC, Howell DS, Manicourt DH. Tensile properties of human knee joint cartilage. I. Influence of ionic conditions, weight bearing, and fibrillation on the tensile modulus. J Orthop Res 1986; 4:379-392.
10. Kim YJ, Bonassar LJ, Grodzinsky AJ. The role of cartilage streaming potential, fluid flow and pressure in the stimulation of chondrocyte biosynthesis during dynamic compression. J Biomech 1995; 28:1055-1066.
11. Hayes WC, Keer LM, Herrmann G, Mockros LF. A mathematical analysis for indentation tests of articular cartilage. J Biomech 1972; 5:541-551.
12. Mow VC, Gibbs MC, Lai WM, Zhu WB, Athanasiou KA. Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage. II. A numerical algorithm and an experimental study. J Biomech 1989; 22:853-861.
13. Athanasiou KA, Rosenwasser MP, Buckwalter JA, Malinin TI, Mow VC. Interspecies comparisons of in situ intrinsic mechanical properties of distal femoral cartilage. J Orthop Res 1991; 9:330-340.
14. Cohen ZA, McCarthy DM, Ateshian GA, et al. In vivo and in vitro knee joint cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI (abstr). Trans Orthop Res Soc 1997; 22:625.
15. Lösch A, Eckstein F, Haubner M, Englmeier KH. A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI. I. Development of a computational method. Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 15:795-804.
16. Haubner M, Eckstein F, Lösch A, et al. A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI. II. Validation with CT arthrography. Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 15:805-813.
17. Englmeier KH, Haubner M, Lösch A, et al. Hybrid rendering of multidimensional image data. Methods Inf Med 1997; 36:1-10.
18. Westhoff J, Eckstein F, Tieschky M, et al. Reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements in the living with fat-suppressed MR sequences (abstr). Trans Eur Orthop Res Soc 1997; 7:29.
19. Eckstein F, Westhoff J, Sittek H, et al. In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging. AJR (in press).
20. Cummings SR, Black D. Should perimenopausal women be screened for osteoporosis? Ann Intern Med 1986; 104:817-823.
21. Ingelmark BE, Ekholm R. A study on variations in the thickness of articular cartilage in association with rest and periodical load: an experimental investigation on rabbits. Acta Soc Med Upsalien 1948; 53:61-74.
22. Ekholm R, Ingelmark BE. Functional thickness variations of human articular cartilage. Acta Soc Med Upsalien 1952; 57:39-59.
23. Rubenstein JD, Kim JK, Henkelman RM. Effects of compression and recovery on bovine articular cartilage: appearance on MR images. Radiology 1996; 201:843-850.
24. Herberhold C, Eckstein F, Faber S, et al. A new MRI-based method for analyzing the "in-situ" deformation of articular cartilage in intact joints (abstr). In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1997; 1041.
25. Herberhold C, Stammberger T, Faber S, et al. A MR-based technique for quantifying the deformation of articular cartilage during mechanical loading in an intact cadaver joint. Magn Reson Med (in press).
26. Huberti HH, Hayes WC. Patellofemoral contact pressures. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1984; 66:715-724.
27. Hehne HJ. Biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint and its clinical relevance. Clin Orthop 1990; 258:73-85.
28. Armstrong CG, Mow VC. Variations in the intrinsic mechanical properties of human articular cartilage with age, degeneration, and water content. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1982; 64:88-94.
29. Setton LA, Zhu W, Mow VC. The biphasic poroviscoelastic behavior of articular cartilage: role of the surface zone in governing the compressive behavior. J Biomech 1993; 36:581-592.