Factors in successful program implementation in Russia during the transition: Pilot programs as a guide

Public Administration and Development

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 63-83

  Struyk, Raymond J ^a,b  

^a Management   (Germany)

^b Egypt Financial Services   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Program implementation; Russia; Transition economies

Indexed keywords

MARKET TRANSITION; TRANSITIONAL ECONOMY;

EURASIA; RUSSIAN FEDERATION;

EID: 33847729371     PISSN: 02712075     EISSN: 1099162X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pad.430     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adams CF, Bell M, Brown T. 2002. Building civic infrastructure: implementing community partnership grant programmes in South Africa. Public Administration and Development 22(4): 293-302.
2. Berman P. 1978. The study of macro- and micro- implementation. Public Policy 26(2): 157-184.
3. Berman P. 1980. Thinking about programmed and adaptive implementation: matching strategies to situations. In Why Public Policies Succeed or Fail, Ingram HM, Mann DE (eds). Sage: Beverly Hills, CA; 205-227.
4. Blore I. 1999. Poor people, poor services: the future of urban services as seen through 50 years of debate in public administration and development and its predecessors. Public Administration and Development 19(5): 453-465.
5. Bovaird T, Loffler E. 2002. Moving from excellence models of local service delivery to benchmarking 'good local governance'. International Review of Administrative Sciences 68: 9-25.
6. Bowen E. 1982. The Pressman-Wildasky paradox: four addenda on why models based on probability theory can predict implementation success and suggest useful tactical advice for implementers. Journal of Public Policy 2(1): 1-21.
7. Brinkerhoff DW. 1994. Institutional development in World Bank projects: analytical approaches and intervention designs. Public Administration and Development 14: 135-151.
8. Di Francesco M. 2001. Process not outcomes in new public management? 'Policy Coherence' in Australian Government. The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs 1(3): 103-116.
9. Ferrazzi G. 2005. Obligatory functions and minimum service standards of Indonesian regional government: searching for a model. Public Administration and Development 25(3): 227-238.
10. Freinkman L, Treisman D, Titov S. 1999. Subnational Budgeting in Russia: Preempting a Potential Crisis. World Bank: Washington, DC; Technical Paper no. 452.
11. Gallagher J, Struyk R. 2001. Strengthening the Local Administration of Social Assistance in Russia. Urban Institute: Washington, DC.
12. Giacchino S, Kakabadse A. 2003. Successful policy implementation: the route to building self-confident government. International Review of Administrative Sciences 69: 139-160.
13. Goggin ML, Bowman AO'M, Lester JP, O'Toole LJ, Jr. 1990. Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation. Harper Collins Publishers: CITY.
14. Hill M, Hupe P. 2002. Implementing Public Policy. Sage Publications: London.
15. Khabusi J. 1997. Public sector versus private sector: the case of Uganda. Public Administration and Development 17: 161-165.
16. Khan Z, Thornton N, Frazer M. 2000. Experience of a financial reforms project in Bangladesh. Public Administration and Development 20: 33-42.
17. Knight J, Ensminger J. 1998. Conflict over changing social norms: bargaining, ideology, and enforcement. In New Institutionalism in Sociology,
18. Brinton M, Nee V (eds). Russell Sage Foundation: New York; 105-126.
19. Larson AM. 2003. Decentralization and forest management in Latin America: towards a working model. Public Administration and Development 23(3): 211-226.
20. Lennon MC, Corbett T. 2003. Policy into Action: Implementation Research and Welfare Reform. The Urban Institute Press: Washington, DC.
21. Lewis BD. 2003. Property tax in Indonesia: measuring and explaining administrative (under-) performance. Public Administration and Development 23(3): 227-239.
22. Light P. 1998. Tides of reform: making government work. Yale: New Haven, CN.
23. Lipsky M. 1980. Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual public services. Sage: Beverly Hills, CA.
24. Meyer-Emerick N, Mothusi B, Molaodi DK. 2004. Decentralization of service delivery as adopted by the central district council in Botswana. Public Administration and Development 24(3): 225-233.
25. Mitchinson R. 2003. Devolution in Uganda: an experiment in local service delivery. Public Administration and Development 23(3): 241-248.
26. Nee V. 1992. Organizational dynamics of market transition: hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 1-27.
27. Nee V. 1998. Norms and networks in economic and organizational performance. American Economic Review May: 85-89.
28. O'Toole LJ. 1983. Inter-organizational cooperation and the implementation of active labor market training polices. Organizational Studies 4(2): 129-150.
29. O'Toole LJ. 1986. Policy recommendations for multi-actor implementation: an assessment of the field. Journal of Public Policy 6(2): 181-210.
30. O'Toole LJ. 2004. The theory-practice issue in policy implementation research. Public Administration 82(2): 309-318.
31. Owusu F. 2005. Livelihood strategies and performance of Ghana's health and education sectors. Public Administration and Development 25(2): 157-174.
32. Papadimitriou D, Phinnemore D. 2003. Mettre en oeuvre les jumelages institutionnels: les lecons du cas roumains. Revue d'etudes comparatives Est-Ouest 34(3): 65-83.
33. Perry JL. 1999. Bringing Society In: Toward a Theory of Public-Service Motivation. Paper prepared for presentation at the Fifth National Public Management Research Conference, The Bush School of Public Affairs, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, December 3.
34. Peterson SB. 2001. Financial reform in a devolved African Country: lessons from Ethiopia. Public Administration and Development 21(2): 131-148.
35. Povan KG, Milward HB. 1991. Institutional-level norms and organizational involvement in a service-implementation network. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 4: 391-417.
36. Pressman JL, Wildavsky A. 1984. Implementation(3rd edn). University of Califorma Press: Berkeley.
37. Robinson R, Stiedl D. 2001. Decentralization of road administration: case studies in African and Asia. Public Administration and Development 21(1): 53-64.
38. Rondinelli D. 1991. Decentralizing water supply services in developing countries: factors affecting success of community management. Public Administration and Development 11: 415-430.
39. Roth D. 1994. How 'integrated' is rural development? The case of the Pompengan Integrated Area Development Project (PIADP), Luwu District, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Public Administration and Development 14: 377-393.
40. Sabatier PA, Jenkins-Smith HC. 1993. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Westview Press: San Francisco.
41. Saburov E, Tipenko N, Cherniavskii A. 2001. Budget federalism and interbudgetary relations. Problems of Economic Transition 43(11): 76-92.
42. Schofield J. 2001. The old ways are the best? The durability and usefulness of bureaucracy in public sector management. Organization 8(1): 77-96.
43. Schofield J. 2004. A model of learned implementation. Public Administration 82(2): 283-307.
44. Schofield J, Sausman C. 2004. Symposium on implementing public policy: learning from theory and practice - Introduction. Public Administration 82(2): 235-248.
45. Shepherd A. 1995. Participatory environmental management: contradiction of process, project and bureaucracy in the Himalayan foothills. Public Administration and Development 15: 465-479.
46. Vickland S, Nieuwenhujis I. 2005. Critical success factors for modernizing public financial management information systems in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Public Administration and Development 25(2): 95-103.
47. Wallich C (ed.). 1994. Russia and the Challenge of Fiscal Federalism. World Bank: Washington, DC.
48. Wunsch JS. 2001. Decentralization, local governance and 'recentralization' in Africa. Public Administration and Development 21(4): 277-288.