Obligatory functions and minimum service standards for Indonesian regional government: Searching for a model

Public Administration and Development

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 227-238

  Ferrazzi, Gabriele ^a,b  

^a BRANDON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Indonesia; Minimum service standards; Obligatory functions; Regional autonomy; Regional government

Indexed keywords

FEASIBILITY STUDY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; POLITICAL SYSTEM; REGIONAL POLITICS; STANDARD (REFERENCE);

ASIA; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; INDONESIA; SOUTHEAST ASIA; WORLD;

EID: 24044489594     PISSN: 02712075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pad.363     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. APKASI. 2003. Regional governments 'more responsive' to the people, Tuesday, July 29. Obtained from the World Wide Web July 29, 2003 at http://www.apkasi.info/
2. ADB. 2005. Final Report of Local Government Provision of Minimum Basic Services for the Poor. TA3967 RTI-GTZ: Jakarta, February.
3. Bahl R. 1999. Implementation Rules For Fiscal Decentralization, International Studies Program, School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
4. Department of Interior and Local Government. 2000. Local Productivity and Performance Management System - A Self-Assessment System of Local Government Units. Government of the Philippines: Manila.
5. Department of Interior and Local Government. 2002. Local Development Watch - User's Manual. Government of the Philippines: Manila.
6. Federal Republic of Germany. (1997). Local Government Constitution - Legal Texts. Inter Nationes: Bonn.
7. Ferrazzi G. 2002a. Legal standing and models of local government functions in selected countries: implications for Indonesia, Gesellschaft Für Technische Zusammenarbeit, Report SfDM 2002 - 1, Jakarta, March.
8. Ferrazzi G. 2002b. Performance management systems of local government in South Africa and Canada, presentation to the workshop on obligatory functions & minimum service standards, ministry of home affairs and the World Bank Dutch Trust Fund, GTZ, USAID and ADB, October 22-24, 2002, Jakarta.
9. Ferrazzi G. 2002c. Obligatory Functions and minimum service standards: A preliminary review of the Indonesian approach, Gesellschaft Für Technische Zusammenarbeit, Report SfDM 2002 - 2, Jakarta, March.
10. Government of Hungary. 1990. Act LXV of 1990 On Local Governments-Municipal Rights, Section 1(5).
11. Lewis DB. 2003. Minimum Local Public Service Delivery Standards in Indonesia: Fiscal Implications and Affordability Concerns. Research Triangle Institute International: Research Triangle, North Carolina, July.
12. Martinez-Vazquez J, Boex J, Ferrazzi G. 2003. Building a bridge between Law 22 and Law 25: Linking expenditure assignments and intergovernmental grants in Indonesia, Technical Paper #1, PADCO-Georgia State University, USAID.
13. May B. 2003. Obligatory functions and minimum service standards, Gesellschaft Für Technische Zusammenarbeit, presented at the World Bank Indonesia Decentralization Workshop, Jakarta, 4-5 February.
14. Milbank D. 1997. Cash-starved counties complain of burdens states impose on them, wall street journal. June 5. Obtained from the World Wide Web 29 June 2003 at: http://www.ncpa.org/pi/taxes/pdtx143.html
15. Ministry of Finance. 2002. Reform of public financial management system in Indonesia: principles and strategies, white paper, July 10.
16. Ministry of Home Affairs. 2002. Pelaksanaan Kewenangan Wajib dan Standar Pelayanan Minimal (SPM) Se-Indonesia (Implementation of obligatory functions and minimum service standards throughout Indonesia), Circular 100/757/OTDA issued July 8 by the director general for regional autonomy on behalf of the Minister.
17. National Office of Local government. 2001. 2000-2001 Report on the operation of the local government (financial assistance) Act 1995 Appendix G - progress in developing performance indicators for Local Government, obtained from the World Wide Web April 22 at http:// www.nolg.gov.au/publications/national_report/00_01/appendix_g/
18. Ontario Municipal Benchmarking Initiative (OMBI). 2001. A Summary of Phase 1 and Phase 2 Pilot Projects - a review of the proceedings of the expert panels, costing of support services and costing methodologies. September 18.
19. PUMA. 2001. Outcome Focused Management And Budgeting, Public Management Committee, Public Management Service, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, PUMA/SBO(2001)5, 22nd Annual Meeting of Senior Budget Officials, Paris, 21-22 May.
20. PUMA. 2002. Overview of results focused management and budgeting in OECD member countries, Public management committee, public management service, organisation for economic co-operation and development, PUMA/ SBO(2002) 1, expert meeting on the quality of public expenditure - implementation challenges in result focussed budgeting and management, Paris, 11-12 February.
21. Oliver C. 1997. "Passing the buck to counties," investor's business daily, February 14. Obtained from the World Wide Web June 29, 2003 at: http://www.ncpa.org/pd/state/feb97.html#2
22. World Bank Dutch Trust Fund. 2003. Model building of obligatory functions and minimum service standards - synthesis report, draft March 26.
23. World Bank. 2002. Lombok Timur Public Expenditure Review. World Bank: Jakarta, January.