Chemically modified, ultra-hydrophilic titanium implant surfaces;Chemisch modifizierte, ultra-hydrophile Titanimplantatoberflächen

Mund - Kiefer - und Gesichtschirurgie

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 11-17

  Schwarz, Frank ^a   Herten, Monika ^a   Wieland, Marco ^b   Dard, Michel ^b   Becker, Jürgen ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b INSTITUT STRAUMANN AG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Hydrophilicity; Osseointegration; Titanium implants

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; BONE REGENERATION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE REGENERATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 33847722958     PISSN: 14329417     EISSN: 14343940     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10006-006-0045-1     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J (2004) Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 15:381-392
2. Ahmad M, McCarthy MB, Gronowicz G (1999) An in vitro model for mineralization of human osteoblast-like cells on implant materials. Biomaterials 20:211-220
3. Albrektsson T (1983) Direct bone anchorage of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 50:255-261
4. Baier RE, Dutton RC (1969) Initial events in interactions of blood with a foreign surface. J Biomed Mater Res 3:191-206
5. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J (2003) De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 14:251-262
6. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DG, Michaels CM (1992) Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 7:302-310
7. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A (1969) Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 3:81-100
8. Brash JL, ten Hove P (1984) Effect of plasma dilution on adsorption of fibrinogen to solid surfaces. Thromb Haemost 51:326-330
9. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A, Steinemann SG (2004) Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 83:529-533
10. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H (1991) Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 25:889-902
11. Chappard D, Aguado E, Hure G, Grizon F, Basle MF (1999) The early remodeling phases around titanium implants: A histomorphometric assessment of bone quality in a 3- and 6-month study in sheep. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14:189-196
12. Davies JE (1998) Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 11:391-401
13. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM, Chipman ML, Valiquette N (1990) A histological comparison in the dog of porous-coated vs. threaded dental implants. J Dent Res 69:1138-1145
14. Ferguson SJ, Broggini N, Wieland M, de Wild M, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Cochran DL, Buser D (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 78:291-297
15. Haroon ZA, Hettasch JM, Lai TS, Dewhirst MW, Greenberg CS (1999) Tissue transglutaminase is expressed, active, and directly involved in rat dermal wound healing and angiogenesis. Faseb J 13:1787-1795
16. Healy KE, Ducheyne P (1992) Hydration and preferential molecular adsorption on titanium in vitro. Biomaterials 13:553-561
17. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J (1985) Aspects of surface physics on titanium implants. Swed Dent J Suppl 28:19-36
18. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Aronsson BO, Rodahl M, Lausmaa J, Kasemo B, Ericson LE (1996) Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants: studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. Biomaterials 17:605-616
19. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Lausmaa J, Rodahl M, Kasemo B, Ericson LE (1994) Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: Studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology. Biomaterials 15:1062-1074
20. Masaki C, Schneider GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Stanford C (2005) Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression. Clin Oral Implants Res 16:650-656
21. Piattelli A, Scarano A, Piattelli M, Calabrese L (1996) Direct bone formation on sand-blasted titanium implants: An experimental study. Biomaterials 17:1015-1018
22. Reilly TM, Seldes R, Luchetti W, Brighton CT (1998) Similarities in the phenotypic expression of pericytes and bone cells. Clin Orthop 95-103
23. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, de Wild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J (2006) Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 76:323-334
24. Schmaier AH, Silver L, Adams AL, Fischer GC, Munoz PC, Vroman L, Colman RW (1984) The effect of high molecular weight kininogen on surface-adsorbed fibrinogen. Thromb Res 33:51-67
25. Schwartz Z, Boyan BD (1994) Underlying mechanisms at the bone-biomaterial interface. J Cell Biochem 56:340-347
26. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Dard M, Wieland M, Becker J (2007) Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA ® titanium implants. Preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res (in press)
27. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Dard M, Wieland M, Becker J (2007) Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early subepithelial connective tissue attachment at chemically modified and conventional SLA ® titanium implants. A pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Investig (in press)
28. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J (2007) Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive ®) and conventional SLA titanium implants. A pilot study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 34:78-86
29. Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Sculean A, Georg T, Scherbaum W, Becker J (2003) Effects of an Er:YAG laser and the Vector ultrasonic system on the biocompatibility of titanium implants in cultures of human osteoblast-like cells. Clin Oral Implants Res 14:784-792
30. Taborelli M, Jobin M, Francois P, Vaudaux P, Tonetti M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Simpson JP, Descouts P (1997) Influence of surface treatments developed for oral implants on the physical and biological properties of titanium. (I) Surface characterization. Clin Oral Implants Res 8:208-216
31. Walivaara B, Aronsson BO, Rodahl M, Lausmaa J, Tengvall P (1994) Titanium with different oxides: In vitro studies of protein adsorption and contact activation. Biomaterials 15:827-834
32. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E (1995) Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 29:1567-1575
33. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Cochran DL, Boyan BD (2005) High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A 74:49-58