Implementation science: A role for parallel dual processing models of reasoning?

Implementation Science

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2006, Pages

  Sladek, Ruth M ^a   Phillips, Paddy A ^a   Bond, Malcolm J ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847722285     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-12     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Grol R, Grimshaw J: From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 2003, 362:1125-1130.
2. Eccles MP, Grimshaw J, Walker A, Johnston M, Pitts N: Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings, J Clin Epidemiol 2005, 58:107-112.
3. Smith WT: An explanation of theories that guide evidence-based interventions to improve quality. Clinical Governance 2003, 8:247-254.
4. Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M: Improving patient care: the implementation of change in clinical practice Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2005.
5. Sloman S: The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol Bull 1996, 119:3-22.
6. Evans J, Over D: Rationality and reasoning UK: Psychology Press; 1996.
7. Stanovich KE, West RF: Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behav Brain Sci 2000, 23:645-726.
8. Shafir E, LeBoeuf RA: Rationality. Annu Rev Psychol 2002, 53:491-517.
9. Epstein S, Pacini R, Denes-Raj V, Heuer H: Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996, 71:390-405.
10. Chaiken S: Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980, 39:752-766.
11. Kahneman D: A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 2003, 58:697-720.
12. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds: Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002:18.
13. Stanovich KE: Who is rational? Studies in individual differences in reasoning Mahway, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999.
14. Croskerry P: Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Acad Emerg Med 2002, 9:1184-1204.
15. Croskerry P: The theory and practice of clinical decision-making. Can J Anesth 2005, 52:R1-R6.
16. Poses RM, Anthony M: Availability, wishful thinking, and physicians' diagnostic judgments for patients with suspected bacteremia. Med Dec Making 1991, 11: 160-168.
17. Croskerry P: Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decisionmaking. Ann Emerg Med 2003, 41:110-120.
18. Dawson NV: Physician judgment in clinical settings: methodological influences and cognitive performance. Clin Chem 1993, 39:1468-1480.
19. Slovic P, MacGregor DG, Malmfors T, Purchase IFH: Influence of affective processes on toxicogists' judgments of risk (Report No 99-2) Eugene, OR: Decision Research; 1999. [as cited by] Slovic P, Finucane M, Peters E, MacGregor DG. The affect heuristic in [12].
20. Newstead SE: Are there two types of thinking? Behov Brain Sci 2000, 23:690.
21. Sa W, Kelley C, Ho C, Stanovich K: Thinking about personal theories: individual differences in the coordination of theory and evidence. Pers Individ Dif 2005, 38:1149-1161.
22. Baron J: Thinking and deciding 3rd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University; 2000.
23. Cacioppo JT, Petty RE: The need for cognition. J Pers Soc Psychol 1982, 42:116-131.
24. Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, Feinstein JA, Jarvis WEG: Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: the life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychol Bull 1996, 119:197-253.
25. Corsini RJ, Auerbach AJ, eds: Concise Encyclopaedia of Psychology 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley; 1996.
26. Myers IB, McCaulley MH, Quenk NL, Hammer AL: MBTI manual: a guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator 3rd edition. Palo Alto: CPP; 1998.
27. Claxton RP, McIntyre RP: Empirical relationships between need for cognition and cognitive style: implications for consumer psychology. Psychol Rep 1994, 74:723-732.
28. Pacini R, Epstein S: The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999, 76:972-987.
29. Stilwell NA, Wallick MM, Thaj SE, Burleson JA: Myers-Briggs type and medical specialty choice: a new look at an old question. Teach Learn Med 2000, 12:14-20.
30. Clack G, Alien J, Cooper D, Head J: Personality differences between doctors and their patients: implications for the teaching of communication skills. Med Educ 2004, 38:177-186.
31. Ornstein S, Johnson A, Markert G, Afrin L: Association between family medicine residents' personality and laboratory testordering for hypertensive patients. J Med Educ 1987, 62:603-605.
32. Epstein S: Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Am Psychol 1994, 49:709-724.