A context-sensitive technique for unsupervised change detection based on hopfield-type neural networks

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 778-788

  Ghosh, Susmita ^b   Bruzzone, Lorenzo ^a,c   Patra, Swarnajyoti ^b   Bovolo, Francesca ^a,c   Ghosh, Ashish ^d  

^a IEEE   (Italy)

^b JADAVPUR UNIVERSITY   (India)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^d INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Change detection; Context sensitive image analysis; Hopfield neural network; Multitemporal images; Remote sensing; Thresholding

Indexed keywords

CHANGE DETECTION; CONTEXT-SENSITIVE IMAGE ANALYSIS; HOPFIELD NEURAL NETWORK; MULTITEMPORAL IMAGES; THRESHOLDING;

CORRELATION METHODS; IMAGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; NEURAL NETWORKS; REMOTE SENSING;

SIGNAL DETECTION;

EID: 33847695328     PISSN: 01962892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2006.888861     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. A. Singh, "Digital change detection techniques using remotely sensed data," Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 989-1003, 1989.
2. J. A. Richards and X. Jia, Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis, 4th ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2006.
3. J. Cihlar, T. J. Pultz, and A. L. Gray, "Change detection with synthetic aperture radar," Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 401-414, 1992.
4. L. Bruzzone and S. B. Serpico, "An iterative technique for the detection of land-cover transitions in multitemporal remote-sensing images," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 858-867, Jul. 1997.
5. L. Bruzzone and D. Fernàndez Prieto, "An adaptive parcel-based technique for unsupervised change detection," Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 817-822, 2000.
6. S. Gopal and C. Woodcock, "Remote sensing of forest change using artificial neural networks," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 398-404, Mar. 1996.
7. T. Hame, I. Heiler, and J. S. Miguel-Ayanz, "An unsupervised change detection and recognition system for forestry," Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1079-1099, 1998.
8. P. S. Chavez, Jr. and D. J. MacKinnon, "Automatic detection of vegetation changes in the southwestern United States using remotely sensed images," Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 1285-1294, 1994.
9. K. R. Merril and L. Jiajun, "A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment," Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 95-100, 1998.
10. T. Fung, "An assessment of TM imagery for land-cover change detection," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 681-684, Jul. 1990.
11. D. M. Muchoney and B. N. Haack, "Change detection for monitoring forest defoliation," Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 1243-1251, 1994.
12. L. Bruzzone and D. Fernàndez Prieto, "Automatic analysis of the difference image for unsupervised change detection," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1171-1182, May 2000.
13. J. R. G. Townshend and C. O. Justice, "Spatial variability of images and the monitoring of changes in the normalized difference vegetation index," Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 2187-2195, 1995.
14. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin, "Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm," J.R. Stat. Soc., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1-38, 1977.
15. Y. Bazi, L. Bruzzone, and F. Melgani, "An unsupervised approach based on the generalized Gaussian model to automatic change detection in multitemporal SAR images." IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 874-887, Apr. 2005.
16. L. Bruzzone and D. Fernàndez Prieto, "An adaptive semiparametric and context-based approach to unsupervised change detection in multitemporal remote-sensing images," IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 452-466, Apr. 2002.
17. A. Ghosh, N. R. Pal, and S. K. Pal, "Object background classification using Hopfield type neural network," Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 989-1008, 1992.
18. S. Haykin, Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Singapore: Pearson Education, 2003. Fourth Indian Reprint.
19. S. V. B. Aiyer, M. Niranjan, and F. Fallside, "A theoretical investigation into the performance of the Hopfield model," IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 204-215, Jun. 1990.
20. J. J. Hopfield, "Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities," Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 2554-2558, Apr. 1982.
21. _, "Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two state neurons," Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 3088-3092, May 1984.
22. S. K. Pal and D. Dutta Majumdar, Fuzzy Mathematical Approach to Pattern Recognition. New York: Halsted, 1986.
23. A. Rosenfeld and P. De La Torre, "Histogram concavity analysis as an aid in threshold selection," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cyhern., vol. SMC-13, no. 3, pp. 231-235, Mar. 1983.