Publishing in international journals: An examination of trends in Chinese co-authorship

Scientometrics

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 59-86

  Royle, Jo ^a   Coles, Louisa ^a   Williams, Dorothy ^a   Evans, Paul ^b  

^a ROBERT GORDON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ELSEVIER MASSON   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847685358     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1648-5     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. AMIN, M., MABE, M. (2000), Impact Factors: use and abuse, Perspectives in Publishing, 1: 1-6.
2. ARUNACHALAM, S., DOSS, M. J. (2000), Mapping international collaboration in science in Asia through coauthorship analysis, Current Science, 79: 621-628.
3. BASSECOULARD, E., OKUBO, Y., ZITT, M. (2001), Insights in determinents of international scientific collaboration. In: HAVEMANN, F., WAGNER,-DÖBLER, R., KRETSCHMER, H. (Eds), Collaboration in Science and Technology: Proceedings of the Second Berlin Workshop on Scientometrics and Infometrics, September 1st-3rd, 2000. Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsforschung, Berlin, pp. 13-28.
4. BENNETT, D. M., TAYLOR, D. M. (2003), Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers, Emergency Medicine, 15: 263-270.
5. BORDONS, M., GÓMEZ, I., FERNÁ NDEZ, M. T., ZULUETA, M. A., MÉNDEZ, A. (1996), Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research, Scientometrics, 37: 279-295.
6. BRAUN, T., GLÄNZEL, W., SCHUBERT, A. (1999), A global snapshot of scientific trends, UNESCO Courier, 52: 28-29.
7. BRAUN, T., GLÄNZEL, W., SCHUBERT, A. (2000), How balanced is the Science Citation Index's journal coverage? A preliminary overview of macrolevel statistical data. In: CRONIN, B., BARSKY, ATKINS, H. (Eds), The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. American Society for Information Science, Medford, New Jersey, pp. 251-277.
8. BUELA,-CASAL, G. (2004), Assessing the quality of articles and scientific journals: Proposal for weighted impact factor and a quality index, Psychology in Spain, 8: 60-76.
9. CARAYANNIS, E. G., LAGET, P. (2004), Transatlantic innovation infrastructure networks: Public-private, EU-US R&D partnerships, R & D Management, 34: 17-31.
10. CHEN, L., SU, J., MAO, X. (2004), Funding pattern and policy research on National Science Foundation of China, Studies in Science of Science, 22: 581-588. (in Chinese).
11. CRONIN, B. (1995), The Scholar's Courtesy: The Role of Acknowledgements in the Primary Communication Process, Taylor and Francis, London.
12. CRONIN, B. (2001), Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52: 558-569.
13. CRONIN, B. (2004), Bowling alone together: Academic writing as distributed cognition, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55: 557-560.
14. ENGELS, A., RUSCHENBURG, T., WEINGART, P. (2005), Recent internationalization of global environmental change research in Germany and the US, Scientometrics, 62: 67-85.
15. FLANAGIN, A., CAREY, L., FONTANAROSA, P. B., PHILLIPS, S. G., PACE, B. P., LUNDBERG, G. D., RENNIE, D. (1998), Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals, The Journal of the American Medical Association, 280: 222-224.
16. GARFIELD, E. (1996), How can impact factors be improved? British Medical Journal, 313: 411-413.
17. GEORGHIOU, L. (1998), Global cooperation in research, Research Policy, 27: 611-626.
18. GILES, C. L., COUNCILL, I. G. (2004), Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101: 17599-17604.
19. GLÄNZEL, W. (2001), National characteristics in international science co-authorship, Scientometrics, 51: 69-115.
20. GLÄNZEL, W., MOED, H. F. (2002), Journal impact measures in bibliometric research, Scientometrics, 53: 171-193.
21. GLÄNZEL, W., SCHUBERT, A. (2001), Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in Chemistry, Scientometrics, 50: 199-214.
22. GOLDFINCH, S., DALE, T., DEROUEN, K. (2003), Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and 'periphery effects' in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995-2000, Scientometrics, 57: 321-337.
23. GORDON, M. D. (1980), A Critical reassessment of inferred relations between multiple authorship, scientific collaboration, the production of papers and their acceptance for publication, Scientometrics, 2: 193-201.
24. HE, T., ZHANG, J., TENG, L. (2005), Basic research in biochemistry and molecular biology in China: A bibliometric analysis, Scientometrics, 62: 249-259.
25. JIN, B., ROUSSEAU, R. (2004), Evaluation of research performance and scientometric indicators in China. In: MOED, H. F., GLÄNZEL, W., SCHMOCH, U. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Science and Technology Research. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht and London, pp. 497-514.
26. KATZ, J. S., MARTIN, B. R. (1997), What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26: 1-18.
27. KING, D. A. (2004), The scientific impact of nations, Nature, 430: 311-316.
28. KING, J. T. (2000), How many neurosurgeons does it take to write a research article? Authorship proliferation in neurological research, Neurosurgery, 47: 435-440.
29. LABAND, D. N., TOLLISON, R. D. (2000), Intellectual collaboration, Journal of Political Economy, 108: 632-662.
30. LAUDEL, G. (2002), What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11: 3-15.
31. LEIMU, R., KORICHEVA, J. (2005), Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? Bioscience, 55: 438-443.
32. LEYDESDORFF, L., ZHOU, P. (2005), Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics, 63: 617-630.
33. MA, N., GUAN, J. (2005), An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publications in molecular biology, Scientometrics, 65: 343-355.
34. MATTHIESSEN, C. W., SCHWARZ, A. W., FIND, S. (2002), The top-level global research system, 1997-99: Centres, networks and nodality. An analysis based on bibliometric indicators, Urban Studies, 39: 903-927.
35. MEADOWS, J. (2000), The growth of journal literature: A historical perspective. In: CRONIN, B., BARSKY, ATKINS, H. (Eds), The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. American Society for Information Science, Medford, New Jersey, pp. 87-107.
36. MERTON, R. K., GARFIELD, E. (1986), Foreword. In: PRICE, D. J. DE, SOLLA, (Ed.), Little Science, Big Science... and Beyond. Columbia University Press, New York, NY. [Available at: http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v10p072y1987.pdf]
37. MEYER, M., BHATTACHARYA, S. (2004), Commonalities and differences between scholarly and technical collaboration - an exploration of co-invention and co-authorship analyses, Scientometrics, 61: 443-456.
38. NAGPAUL, P. S. (2003), Exploring a pseudo-regression model of transnational cooperation in science, Scientometrics, 56: 403-416.
39. PAVITT, K. (1998), The social shaping of the national science base, Research Policy, 27: 793-805.
40. PORAC, J. F., WADE, J. B., FISCHER, H. M., BROWN, J., KANFER, A., BOWKER, G. (2004), Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: A comparative case study of two scientific teams, Research Policy, 33: 661-678.
41. PRICE, D. J. DE, SOLLA, (1963), Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York.
42. RENNIE, D., FLANAGIN, A. (1994), Authorship! Authorship!: guests, ghosts, grafters and the two-sided coin (editorial), The Journal of the American Medical Association, 271: 469-471.
43. RUSSELL, J. M. (2001), Scientific communication at the beginning of the twenty-first century, International Social Science Journal, 168: 271-282.
44. SCHUMMER, J. (2004), Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology, Scientometrics, 59: 425-465.
45. SEGLEN, P. O. (1997), Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, British Medical Journal, 314: 498-502.
46. SHAPIRO, D. W., WENGER, N. S., SHAPIRO, M. (1994), The contributions of authors to multi-authored biomedical research papers, The Journal of the American Medical Association, 271: 438-442.
47. THE, PUBLISHERS, ASSOCIATION, (2005), The Attitudes of Chinese Academics to Foreign Scholarly Journals: part 1, report, The Publishers Association, London.
48. VAN, RAAN, A. F. J. (1998), The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results, Scientometrics, 42: 423-428.
49. VERBEEK, A., DEBACKERE, K., LUWEL, M., ZIMMERMANN, E. (2002), Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology - I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators, International Journal of Management Reviews, 4: 179-211.
50. WAGNER, C. S. (2005), Six case studies of international collaboration in science, Scientometrics, 62: 3-26.
51. WAGNER, C. S., LEYDESDORFF, L. (2005), Network structure, self organisation and the growth of international collaboration in science, Research Policy, 34: 1606-1618.
52. WANG, Y., WU, Y. (2001), Status and trend of scientific and technical collaboration between People's Republic of China and Commonwealth of Australia. In: HAVEMANN, F., WAGNER,-DÖBLER, R., KRETSCHMER, H. (Eds), Collaboration in Science and Technology: Proceedings of the Second Berlin Workshop on Scientometrics and Infometrics, September 1st-3rd, 2000. Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsforschung, Berlin, pp. 211-219.
53. WANG, Y., WU, Y., PAN, Y., MA, Z., ROUSSEAU, R. (2005), Scientific collaboration in china as reflected in co-authorship, Scientometrics, 62: 183-198.
54. ZHANG, H., GUO, H. (1997), Research collaboration in China, Scientometrics, 38: 309-319.
55. ZHOU, P., LEYDESDORFF, L. (2006), The emergence of China as a leading nation in science, Research Policy, 85: 83-104.