Pluralism in the economics of sustainable forest management

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 743-750

  Wang, Sen ^a   Wilson, Bill ^a  

^a PACIFIC FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Multiple interest forestry; Multiple uses; Stakeholder; Wood compatibility

Indexed keywords

FOREST ECONOMICS; FOREST ROTATIONS; MULTIPLE INTEREST FORESTRY; WOOD COMPATIBILITY;

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS;

FORESTRY;

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; MULTIPLE USE; SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33847672236     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.013     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ananda J., and Herath G. Incorporating stakeholder values into regional forest planning: a value function approach. Ecological Economics 45 1 (2003) 75-90
2. Anderson J. Brief summary of workshop discussions and activities. In: Eldan J., and Anderson J. (Eds). Pluralism and Sustainable Forestry and Rural Development. Proceedings of an international workshop, Rome, Dec. 9-12, 1997 (1999), FAO, Rome, Italy 3-9
3. Anderson J., Clément J., and Crowder L.V. Accommodating conflicting interests in forestry - concepts emerging from pluralism. Unasylva 49 194 (1998) 3-10
4. Balaji S. The technical aspects of sustainable forestry and rural development in a pluralistic institutional environment. In: Eldan J., and Anderson J. (Eds). Pluralism and Sustainable Forestry and Rural Development. Proceedings of an international workshop, Rome, Dec. 9-12, 1997 (1999), FAO, Rome, Italy 389-407
5. Binkley C.S. Forestry in a post-modern world: Part II. Branch Lines 7 3 (1996) 1
6. Calish R., Fight R.D., and Teeguarden D.E. How do nontimber values affect Douglas-fir rotations?. Journal of Forestry 76 4 (1978) 217-221
7. Carey A.B. Managing for wildlife: a key component for social acceptance of compatible forest management. In: Monserud R.A., Haynes R.W., and Johnson A.C. (Eds). Compatible Forest Management (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 401-425
8. Carey A.B., Lippke B.R., and Sessions J. Intentional systems management: managing forests for biodiversity. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 9 3/4 (1999) 83-125
9. Dana S.T. Multiple use, biology, and economics. Journal of Forestry 41 9 (1943) 625-626
10. Duschesne L. Canada's forestry sector and the bioeconomy. Canadian Silviculture (2003) 5-13 Fall
11. Gregory G.R. An economic approach to multiple use. Forest Science 1 1 (1955) 6-13
12. Grimble R., Chan M.-K., Aglionby J., and Quan J. Trees and Trade-Offs: A Stakeholder Approach to Natural Resource Management. Gatekeeper Series vol. 52 (1995), International Institute for Environment and Development, London
13. In: Gunderson L.H., and Holling C.S. (Eds). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems (2002), Island Press, Washington / Covelo / London
14. Hartman R. The harvesting decision when a standing forest has value. Economic Inquiry 14 (1976) 52-58
15. Haynes R.W., and Monserud R.A. A basis for understanding compatibility among wood production and other forest values. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-529 (2002), Pacific Northwest Research Station, U.S. Forest Service 47 pp.
16. Holling C.S. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4 (2001) 390-405
17. Kangas J., Store R., and Kangas A. Socioecological landscape planning approach and multicriteria acceptability analysis in multiple-purpose forest management. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (2005) 603-614
18. Kant S. Extending the boundaries of forest economics. Forest Policy and Economics 5 (2003) 39-56
19. Kant S. Economics of sustainable forest management. Forest Policy and Economics 6 (2004) 197-203
20. In: Kant S., and Berry R.A. (Eds). Economics, Sustainability, and Natural Resources: Economics of Sustainable Forest Management vol. 1 (2005), Springer, New York
21. In: Kant S., and Berry R.A. (Eds). Institutions, Sustainability, and Natural Resources: Institutions for Sustainable Forest Management vol. 2 (2005), Springer, New York
22. Kant S., and Lee S. A social choice approach to sustainable forest management: an analysis of multiple forest values in Northwestern Ontario. Forest Policy and Economics 6 (2004) 215-227
23. Kimmins J.P. Future shock in forestry. The Forestry Chronicle 78 2 (2002) 263-271
24. Lacaze J.-F. Forest management for recreation and conservation: new challenges. Forestry 73 2 (2000) 137-141
25. Mather A.S. Forests of consumption: postproductivism, postmaterialism, and the postindustrial forest. Environment and Planning. C, Government and Policy 19 2 (2001) 249-268
26. McArdle R.E. Multiple use - multiple benefits. Journal of Forestry 51 5 (1953) 323-325
27. In: Merlo M., and Croitoru L. (Eds). Valuing Mediterranean Forests: Towards Total Economic Value (2005), CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK
28. Pearce D.W. Economic Values and the Natural World (1993), Earthscan, London, UK
29. Pearson G.A. Multiple use in forestry. Journal of Forestry 42 4 (1944) 243-249
30. Randall A., and Stoll J. Existence and sport values in a total valuation framework. In: Rowe R., and Chestnut L. (Eds). Managing Air Quality and Scenic Resources at National Parks and Wilderness Areas (1983), Westview Press, Boulder, USA
31. Siry J.P., Cubbage F.W., and Ahmed M.R. Sustainable forest management: global trends and opportunities. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (2005) 551-561
32. Vira B. Analytical tools for assessing institutional pluralism in forestry. In: Eldan J., and Anderson J. (Eds). Pluralism and Sustainable Forestry and Rural Development. Proceedings of an international workshop, Rome, Dec. 9-12, 1997 (1999), FAO, Rome, Italy 97-103
33. Wang S. Towards an international convention on forests: building blocks versus stumbling blocks. International Forestry Review 3 4 (2001) 251-264
34. Wang S. One hundred faces of sustainable forest management. Forest Policy and Economics 6 (2004) 205-213
35. Weigand, J.F. 1998. Management experiments for high-elevation agroforestry systems jointly producing matsutake mushrooms and high-quality timber in the Cascade Range of southern Oregon. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-424.
36. Wollenberg E., Anderson J., and Edmunds D. Pluralism and the less powerful: accommodating multiple interests in local forest management. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 1 3/4 (2001) 199-222
37. Zhou W., and Gong P. Multiple-use tradeoffs in Swedish mountain region forests. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (2005) 39-52