Multiple-use tradeoffs in Swedish mountain region forests

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 39-52

  Zhou, Wenchao ^a   Gong, Peichen ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Forest planning; Multiobjective programming; Noninferior set estimation method; Recreation; Reindeer grazing

Indexed keywords

RECREATION INDEX (RI); TIMBER PRODUCTION;

BIODIVERSITY; TIMBER;

FORESTRY;

BIODIVERSITY; FORESTS; LICHENS; MOUNTAINS;

NUCLEOPOLYHEDROVIRUS; RANGIFER TARANDUS;

EID: 9744238906     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00010-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Allen J.C. Multi-objective regional forest planning using the noninferior set estimation (NISE) method in Tanzania and the United States. Forest Science. 32:1986;517-533
2. Anon. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2001. 2001;National Board of Forestry, Jönköping, Sweden
3. Balachandran M., Gero J.S. A comparison of three methods for generating the Pareto optimal set. Engineering Optimization. 7:1984;319-336
4. Balachandran M., Gero J.S. The noninferior set estimation (NISE) method for three objective problems. Engineering Optimization. 9:1985;77-88
5. Church R., Daugherty P.J. Considering intergenerational equity in linear programming-based forest planning models with MAXMIN objective functions. Forest Science. 45:1999;366-373
6. Cohon J.L. Multiobjective Programming and Planning. 1978;Academic Press, New York
7. Eriksson, H., 1976. Yield of Norway spruce in Sweden. Royal College of Forestry, Department of Forest Yield Research, Research Notes 41.
8. Eriksson O., Sandewall M., Wilhelmsson E. A model for analyzing influence of timber production on lichens for reindeer grazing. Rangifer. 7:1987;15-32
9. Forshed, O., 2000. Relations between reindeer herding and commercial timber harvest. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Economics, Working paper 288.
10. Fridman J., Walheim M. Amount, structure, and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management. 131:2000;23-36
11. Gong, P., Boman, M., Mattsson, L., 2001. Multiple-use forest planning techniques: a synthesising analysis. Studia Forestalia Suecica, 212.
12. Hof J.G., Pickens J.B., Bartlett E.T. A MAXMIN approach to nondeclining yield timber harvest scheduling problems. Forest Science. 32:1986;653-666
13. Johnson, K.N., Scheurman, H.L., 1977. Techniques for prescribing optimal timber harvest and investment under different objectives - discussion and synthesis. Forest Science, Monograph 18.
14. Lämås, T., 1996. Forest management planning for biodiversity and timber production. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Resources Management and Geomatics, Report 3.
15. Mattsson L., Li C. The non-timber value of northern Swedish Forests - an economic analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 8:1993;426-434
16. Mattsson L., Li C. How do different forest management practices affect the non-timber value of forests? - an economic analysis. Journal of Environmental Management. 41:1994;79-88
17. Persson, O.A., 1992. A growth simulator for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Sweden. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Yield Research, Report 31.
18. Pukkala T. Methods to incorporate the amenity of landscape into forest management planning. Silva Fennica. 22:1988;135-146
19. Tarp P., Helles F. Multi-criteria decision-making in forest management planning - an overview. Journal of Forest Economics. 1:1995;273-306