Exploring the willingness of scholars to accept open access: A grounded theory approach

Journal of Scholarly Publishing

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 55-84

  Park, Ji Hong ^a   Qin, Jian ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847665070     PISSN: 11989742     EISSN: 17101166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/C972-1321-8720-314M     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Stevan Harnad and Tim Brody, 'Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals,' D-Lib Magazine (June 2004), available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html
2. Peter Suber, 'Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature,' Journal of Biology 1, 1 (18 June 2002): art. 3. available at http://jbiol.com/ content/1/1/3
3. Ibid.;
4. see also BioMed Central, http://biomedcentral.com.
5. Bo-Christer Björk, 'Open Access to Scientific Publications: An Analysis of the Barriers to Change?' Information Research 9, 2 (January 2004), http://information.net/ir/9-2/paper170.html;
6. Elizabeth Gadd, Charles Oppenheim, and Steve Probets, 'RoMEO Studies 1: The Impact of Copyright Ownership on Author-Self-Archiving,' Journal of Documentation 59, 3 (May 2003): 243-77.
7. E.g., Steve Hitchcock, Les Carr, Steve Harris, Steve Probets, David Evans, Wendy Hall, and David Brailsford, 'Linking Electronic Journals: Lessons from the Open Journal Project,' D-Lib Magazine 4, 12 (December 1998), available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december98/12hitchcock.html
8. Stevan Harnad, 'Free at Last: The Future of Peer-Reviewed Journals,' D-Lib Magazine 5, 12 (December 1999), available at http://dlib.org/dlib/ december99/12harnad.html;
9. Stevan Harnad, 'Implementing Peer Review on the Net: Scientific Quality Control in Scholarly Electronic Journals,' in Robin P. Peek and Gregory B. Newby, eds., Scholarly Publishing. The Electronic Frontier (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1996): 107-17
10. L. Halliday and C. Oppenheim, 'Progress in Documentation: Developments in Digital Journals,' Journal of Documentation 57, 2 (March 2001): 296-302;
11. Stevan Harnad, 'Electronic Scholarly Publication: Quo Vadis?' Serials Review 21, 1 (Spring 1995): 70-72
12. Christine L. Borgman, 'Digital Libraries and the Continuum of Scholarly Communication,' Journal of Documentation 56, 4 (July 2000): 412-30
13. James Keller, 'Public Access Issues: An Introduction,' in Brian Kahin and James Keller, eds., Public Access to the Internet (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1995): 34-45
14. Bethesda Principles: Summary of the April 11, 2003, Meeting on Open Access Publishing, BiomedCentral, http://www.biomedcentral.com/ openaccess/bethesda/#definition
15. Budapest Open Access Initiative (English), http://www.soros.org/ openaccess/
16. Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC), http://www.arl.org/sparc/
17. Public Library of Science (PLoS), http://www.publiclibraryofscience.org
18. Rob Kling, Lisa B. Spector, and Joanna Fortuna, 'The Real Stakes of Virtual Publishing: The Transformation of E-Biomed into PubMed Central,' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55, 2 (15 January 2004): 127-48
19. Carl Lagoze and Herbert Van de Sompel, 'The Open Archive Initiative: Building a Low-Barrier Interoperability Framework,' in Edward A. Fox and Christine L. Borgman, eds., Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), June 17-23, Roanoke, VA (Roanoke, VA: ACM/ IEEE-CS 2001): 54-62
20. Björk, 'Open Access to Scientific Publications'
21. H. Woodward, F. Rowland, C. McKnight, J. Meadows, and C. Pritchett, 'Electronic Journals: Myths and Realities,' Library Management 18 (1997): 155-62
22. Don Schauder, 'Electronic Publishing of Professional Articles: Attitudes of Academics and Implications for the Scholarly Communication Industry,' Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45 (1994): 73-100
23. Ibid.
24. Elizabeth Gadd, Charles Oppenheim, and Steve Probets, 'RoMEO Studies 2: How Academics Want to Protect Their Open-Access Research Papers,' Journal of Information Science 29, 5 (September 2003): 333-56;
25. Elizabeth Gadd, Charles Oppenheim, and Steve Probets, 'RoMEO Studies 3: How Academics Expect to Use Open-Access Research Papers,' Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 35, 3 (September 2003): 171-87
26. Gadd et al., 'RoMEO Studies 1'
27. Yvonne S. Lincoln and Egon G. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry (London: Sage Publications 1985), 235
28. Anselm L. Strauss and Juliet Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications 1998)
29. Ibid., 24
30. Anselm L. Strauss and Juliet Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 1st ed. (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications 1990), 57
31. Strauss and Corbin, Basics 2nd ed.
32. Strauss and Corbin, Basics 1st ed, 124
33. Diana Crane, Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1972)
34. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 'Building Theories from Case Study Research,' Academy of Management Review 14, 4 (October 1989): 532-50, 545
35. John W. Creswell and Martha L. Brown, 'How Chairpersons Enhance Faculty Research: A Grounded Theory Study,' Review of Higher Education 16, 1 (Spring 1992): 41-62
36. Peiling Wang and Dagobert Soergel, 'A Cognitive Model of Document Use during a Research Project, Study I: Document Selection,' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 49, 2 (15 January 1998): 115-33
37. Soo Young Rieh, 'Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority on the Web,' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53, 2 (January 2002): 145-61
38. Ibid.;
39. Wang and Soergel, 'Cognitive Model'
40. Wang and Soergel, 'Cognitive Model'
41. C. Cool, N.J. Belkin, O. Frieder, and P. Kantor, 'Characteristics of Texts Affecting Relevance Judgments.' Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting, New York, May 3-5, 1993 (New York: Learned Information 1993): 77-84
42. J.W. Fritch and R.L. Cromwell, 'Evaluating Internet Resources: Identity, Affiliation, and Cognitive Authority in a Networked World,' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52, 6 (15 March 2001): 499-507
43. Patrick Wilson, Second-Hand Knowledge: An Inquiry into Cognitive Authority (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press 1983), 15
44. Rieh, 'Judgment of Information Quality'
45. Wang and Soergel, 'Cognitive Model'
46. Linda Schamber, 'Users' Criteria for Evaluation in a Multimedia Environment.' Proceedings of the 54th ASIS Annual Meeting 28 (1991): 126-33
47. Carol L. Barry, 'User-Defined Relevance Criteria: An Exploratory Study,' Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45, 3 (1 February 1994): 149-59, 155
48. Schamber, 'Users' Criteria'
49. William H. Delone and Ephraim R. McLean, 'Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable,' Information Systems Research 3, 1 (March 1992): 60-95, 85
50. Yang W. Lee, Diane M. Strong, Beverly K. Kahn, and Richard Y. Wang, 'AIMQ: A Methodology for Information Quality Assessment,' Information and Management 40, 2 (December 2002): 133-46
51. E. Burton Swanson, 'Information Channel Disposition and use,' Decision Sciences 18, 1 (Winter 1987), 131-45
52. Nancy F. Foster and Susan Gibbons, 'Understanding Faculty to Improve Content Recruitment for Institutional Repositories,' D-Lib Magazine 11, 1 (January 2005), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html
53. Karin D. Knorr-Cetina, Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1999)