Manipulator assisted endoscope guidance in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: Proof of concept;Ein konzept für eine automatisierte endoskopführung für die nasennebenhöhlenchirurgie

HNO

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 177-184

  Strauss G ^a   Hofer, M ^a   Kehrt, S ^a   Grunert, R ^a   Korb, W ^a   Trantakis, C ^a   Winkler, D ^a   Meixensberger, J ^a   Bootz, F ^c   Dietz, A ^a   Wahrburg, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SIEGEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automation; CAS; Endoscope guidance; FESS; Medical robotics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; ENDOSCOPE; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; METHODOLOGY; PARANASAL SINUS; PILOT STUDY; ROBOTICS;

ENDOSCOPES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; PARANASAL SINUSES; PILOT PROJECTS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33847662925     PISSN: 00176192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00106-006-1434-3     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Arezzo A, Testa T, Ulmer F et al. (2000) Sistemi di posizionamento per solo chirurgia endoscopica. Minerva Chir 55: 635-641
2. Ayad T, Peloquin L, Prince F (2005) Ergonomics in endoscopic sinus surgery: systematic review of the literature. J Otolaryngol 34: 333-340
3. Berkelman P, Cinquin P, Boidard E et al. (2005) Development and testing of a compact endoscope manipulator for minimally invasive surgery dagger. Comput Aided Surg 10: 1-13
4. Dastidar P, Heinonen T, Numminen J, Rautiainen M, Laasonen E (1999) Semi-automatic segmentation of computed tomographic images in volumetric estimation of nasal airway. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 256: 192-198
5. DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (1995) DIN Taschenbuch 223: Qualitätsmanagement und Statistik - Begriffe, TÜV
6. Jaspers JEN, Breedveld P, Herder JL, Grimbergen CA (2004) Camera and instrument holders and their clinical value in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14: 145-152
7. Kelly C, Boardman M, Goillau P, Jeannot E (2003) Guidelines for Trust in Future. ATM Systems, Brusseles, 1-59
8. Messerklinger W (1972) Technik und Möglichkeiten der Nasenendoskopie. HNO 20: 133-135
9. Morita A, Okada Y, Kitano M et al. (2004) Development of hybrid integrated endoscope-holder system for endoscopic microneurosurgery. Neurosurgery 55: 926-931; discussion 931-932
10. Omote K, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A et al. (1999) Self-guided robotic camera control for laparoscopic surgery compared with human camera control. Am J Surg 177: 321-324
11. Pieck S, Gross I, Knappe P et al. (2003) A navigated mechatronic system with haptic features to assist in surgical interventions. Comput Aided Surg 8: 292-299
12. Proske JM, Dagher I, Franco D (2004) Comparative study of human and robotic camera control in laparoscopic biliary and colon surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14: 345-348
13. Sittel C, Plinkert PK (2004) Minimal-invasive Chirurgie der Nasennebenhöhlen. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 98: 271-277
14. Stammberger H, Posawetz W (1990) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Concept, indications and results of the Messerklinger technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 247: 63-76
15. Strauss G, Fischer M, Meixensberger J et al. (2005) Workflow-Analyse zur Bestimmung der Effizienz von intraoperativer Technologie am Beispiel der endoskopischen Nasennebenhöhlenchirurgie. HNO, in press
16. Wahrburg J, Kerschbaumer F (2000) Überlegungen zum Einsatz mechatronischer Implantationshilfen bei Minimalzugängen fur Hüftendoprothesen. Orthopäde 29: 650-657
17. Winkler M, Erbse S, Radermacher K, Rau G, Rath W (2001) An automatic camera-holding system for gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8: 303-306