The price of non-compliance with the Kyoto Protocol: The remarkable case of Norway

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-15

  Kallbekken, Steffen ^a   Hovi, Jon ^a  

^a CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH OSLO CICERO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Compliance; Enforcement; General equilibrium modelling; International institutions; Kyoto Protocol; Punitive consequences

Indexed keywords

COMPLIANCE; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT; KYOTO PROTOCOL; POLLUTION POLICY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; NORWAY; SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 33847659165     PISSN: 15679764     EISSN: 15731553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10784-006-9025-z     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Babiker, M., Reilly, J. M., & Jacoby, H. D. (2000). The Kyoto Protocol and developing countries. Energy Policy, 28, 525-536.
2. Barrett, S. (2002). Consensus treaties. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 158(4), 529-547.
3. Barrett, S. (2003). Environment & statecraft, the strategy of environmental treaty-making. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. 2 taxation and oil wealth. Energy Journal, 18(4), 33-71.
5. Hagem, C., & Westskog, H. (2005). Effective enforcement and double-edged deterrents. In O. S.
6. Stokke, J. Hovi, & G. Ulfstein (Eds.), Implementing the climate regime: International compliance (pp. 107-125). London: Earthscan.
7. Hagem, C., Kallbekken, S., Mæstad O., & Westskog, H. (2005). Enforcing the Kyoto Protocol: Sanctions and strategic behavior. Energy Policy, 55(16), 2112-2122.
8. Kallbekken, S. (2004). A description of the Dynamic analysis of the Economics of Environmental Policy (DEEP) model', CICERO report 2004:01. Oslo: CICERO.
9. Kallbekken, S., & Westskog, H. (2005). Should developing countries take on binding commitments in a climate agreement? an assessment of gains and uncertainty. Energy Journal, 26(3), 41-60.
10. Nakicenovic, N., & Swart, R. (Eds.) (2000). IPCC Special Report on Emission Scenarios. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Rutherford, T.F., & Paltsev, S.V. (2000). GTAP-Energy in GAMS: The Dataset and Static Model, Working Paper No. 00-2, Department of Economics, University of Colorado.
12. Rypdal, K., Stordal, F., Fuglestvedt, J. S., & Berntsen, T. (2003). Assessing Compliance with the Kyoto Protocol: Expert Reviews, Inverse Modeling or Both? Working Paper 2003:07. Oslo: CICERO.
13. Ulfstein, G., & Werksman, J. (2005). The Kyoto compliance system: Towards hard enforcement. In O. S. Stokke, J. Hovi, & G. Ulfstein (Eds.), Implementing the climate regime: International compliance (pp. 39-62). London: Earthscan.
14. UNFCCC (2005). Decision -/CMP.1 Procedures and mechanisms relating to compliance under the Kyoto Protocol [Advance unedited version]. Internet: http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_11/application/pdf/ cmp1_23_7_procedures_and_rnechanisms_compliance.pdf.
15. Werksman, J. (2005). The negotiation of a Kyoto compliance system. In O. S. Stokke, J. Hovi, & G. Ulfstein (Eds.), Implementing the climate regime: International compliance (pp. 17-37). London: Earthscan.