Does hospital volume have influence on the results of pancreatic surgery?;Beeinflussen Mindestmengen die Ergebnisse der Pankreaschirurgie?

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie

Volumn 132, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 26-31

  Keck, T ^a   Makowiec, F ^a   Adam, U ^a   Hopt, U T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Complications; Hospital volume; Pancreatic head resection; Pancreatic surgery; Review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; GERMANY; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HUMAN; MORTALITY; PANCREAS RESECTION; PATIENT REFERRAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS; SURVIVAL; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; GERMANY; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; PANCREATECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; RISK FACTORS; SURGERY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

EID: 33847643209     PISSN: 0044409X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-958707     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adam U, Makowiec F, Riediger H et al. Risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 201-208
2. Balcom JH, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL et al. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 391-398
3. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1128-1137
4. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2117-2127
5. Brodsky JT, Turnbull AD. Arterial hemorrhage after pancreato- duodenectomy. The 'sentinel bleed'. Arch Surg 1991; 126: 1037-1040
6. Brooks AD, Marcus SG, Gradek C et al. Decreasing length of stay after pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 823-830
7. Buchler MW, Friess H, Muller MW et al. Randomized trial of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pylorus-preserving Whipple in chronic pancreatitis. Am J Surg 1995; 169: 65-69
8. Buchler MW, Friess H, Wagner M et al. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 883-889
9. Di C, V, Zerbi A, Balzano G et al. Pylorus-preserving pancreatico-duodenectomy versus conventional whipple operation. World J Surg 1999; 23: 920-925
10. Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr., Knol JA et al. Hepatic resection in the United States: indications, outcomes, and hospital procedural volumes from a nationally representative database. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 185-191
11. Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Cowan JA et al. Surgical volume and quality of care for esophageal resection: do high-volume hospitals have fewer complications? Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: 337-341
12. Dimick JB, Wainess RM, Cowan JA et al. National trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199: 31-38
13. Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R et al. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA 2000; 283: 1159-1166
14. Fernandez-del CC, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg 1995; 130: 295-299
15. Finlayson EV, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 721-725
16. Glasgow RE, Mulvihill SJ. Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer. West J Med 1996; 165: 294-300
17. Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Bass EB et al. Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189: 46-56
18. Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 786-795
19. Gudjonsson B. Carcinoma of the pancreas: critical analysis of costs, results of resections, and the need for standardized reporting. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 181: 483-503
20. Hashimoto N, Haji S, Nomura H et al. Arterial hemorrhage by pseudoaneurysms following pancreatoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51: 1847-1848
21. Ho V, Heslin MJ. Effect of hospital volume and experience on in-hospital mortality for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 509-514
22. Huang JJ, Yeo CJ, Sohn TA et al. Quality of life and outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2000; 231: 890-898
23. Izbicki JR, Bloechle C, Knoefel WT et al. Duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas in chronic pancreatitis. A prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 1995; 221: 350-358
24. Jimenez RE, Fernandez-del CC, Rattner DW et al. Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 2000; 231: 293-300
25. Kausch W. Das Carzinom der Papilla duodeni und seine radikale Entfernung. Beitr Klin Chir 1912; 78: 439-486
26. Klempa I, Spatny M, Menzel J et al. [Pancreatic function and quality of life after resection of the head of the pancreas in chronic pancreatitis. A prospective, randomized comparative study after duodenum preserving resection of the head of the pancreas versus Whipple's operation]. Chirurg 1995; 66: 350-359
27. Kuo EY, Chang Y, Wright CD. Impact of hospital volume on clinical and economic outcomes for esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72: 1118-1124
28. Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M et al. Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 638-645
29. Lin PW, Lin YJ. Prospective randomized comparison between pyloruspreserving and standard pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 603-607
30. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 1979; 301: 1364-1369
31. Makowiec F, Post S, Saeger HD et al. Current Practice Patterns in Pancreatic Surgery: Results of a Multi-institutional Analysis of Seven Large Surgical Departments in Germany With 1454 Pancreatic Head Resections, 1999 to 2004 (German Advanced Surgical Treatment Study Group). J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 1080-1087
32. Miedema BW, Sarr MG, van Heerden JA et al. Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Current management. Arch Surg 1992; 127: 945-949
33. Mosca F, Giulianotti PC, Balestracci T et al. Long-term survival in pancreatic cancer: pylorus-preserving versus Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 1997; 122: 553-566
34. Neoptolemos JP, Russell RC, Bramhall S et al. Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1370-1376
35. Nordback L, Parviainen M, Raty S et al. Resection of the head of the pancreas in Finland: effects of hospital and surgeon on short-term and long-term results. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37: 1454-1460
36. Otah E, Cushin BJ, Rozenblit GN et al. Visceral artery pseudoaneurysms following pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 55-59
37. Riediger H, Makowiec F, Schareck WD et al. Delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy is strongly related to other postoperative complications. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7: 758-765
38. Roder JD, Stein HJ, Huttl W et al Pylorus-preserving versus standard pancreatico-duodenectomy: an analysis of 110 pancreatic and periampullary carcinomas. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 152-155
39. Sakorafas GH, Farnell MB, Nagorney DM et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis: long-term results in 105 patients. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 517-523
40. Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E et al. Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 583-592
41. Shapiro TM. Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a statistical analysis of biliary bypass vs Whipple resection in good risk patients. Ann Surg 1975; 182: 715-721
42. Siewert JR, Siess MA. [High volume hospital. The connection between number of cases and outcome quality in surgery]. Chirurg 2003; 74: 278-281
43. Simoes E, Bauer S, Jaeckel R et al. Effekte von Mindestmengenregelungen auf die stationäre Versorgungslandschaft. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 2004; 39: 410-417
44. Simunovic M, To T, Langer B. Influence of hospital volume on mortality following major cancer surgery. JAMA 1999; 281: 1374-1375
45. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: role of interventional radiologists in managing patients and complications. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7: 209-219
46. Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA et al. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 1998; 228: 429-438
47. Traverso LW, Shinchi H, Low DE. Useful benchmarks to evaluate outcomes after esophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 604-608
48. van Berge Henegouwen MI, Akkermans LM, van Gulik TM et al. Prospective, randomized trial on the effect of cyclic versus continuous enterai nutrition on postoperative gastric function after pyloruspreserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 677-685
49. Warshaw AL, Fernandez-del CC. Pancreatic carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 455-465
50. Weitz J, Koch M, Kleeff J et al. [Kausch-Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy. Technique and results]. Chirurg 2004; 75: 1113-1119
51. Whipple AO, Parson WB, Mullins CR. Treatment of Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg 1935; 142: 512-526
52. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients. Ann Surg 1995; 221: 721-731
53. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 248-257