National trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 199, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 31-38

  Dimick, Justin B ^a,b   Wainess, Reid M ^a   Cowan, John A ^a   Upchurch Jr , Gilbert R ^a   Knol, James A ^a   Colletti, Lisa M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LIVER RESECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DATABASES; FEMALE; HEPATECTOMY; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; LIVER; LIVER DISEASES; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 3042615589     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Jarnagin W.R., Gonen M., Fong Y., et al. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection analysis of 1, 803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg. 236:2002;397-406
2. Fong Y., Fortner J., Sun R.L., et al. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer analysis of 1, 001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 230:1999;309-318
3. Dimick J.B., Cowan J.A. Jr, Knol J.A., Upchurch G.R. Jr. Hepatic resection in the United States indications, outcomes, and hospital procedural volumes from a nationally representative database. Arch Surg. 138:2003;185-191
4. Glasgow R.E., Showstack J.A., Katz P.P., et al. The relationship between hospital volume and outcomes of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg. 134:1999;30-35
5. Choti M.A., Bowman H.M., Pitt H.A., et al. Should hepatic resections be performed at high-volume referral centers? J Gastrointest Surg. 2:1998;11-20
6. Begg C.B., Cramer L.D., Hoskins W.J., Brennan M.F. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 280:1998;1747-1751
7. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP-6). Nationwide Inpatient Sample, Release 6. 1997;Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, Rockville, MD
8. th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). 1991;US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC
9. Romano P.S., Roos L.L., Jollis J.G. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol. 46:1993;1075-1079
10. Charlson M.E., Pompei P., Ales K.L., MacKenzie C.R. A new method for classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 40:1987;373-383
11. Deyo R.A., Cherkin D.C., Ciol M.A. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 45:1992;613-619
12. Choti M.A., Sitzmann J.V., Tiburi M.F., et al. Trends in long-term survival following liver resection for hepatic colorectal metastases. Ann Surg. 235:2002;759-766
13. Birkmeyer J.D. Should we regionalize major surgery? Potential benefits and policy considerations. J Am Coll Surg. 190:2000;341-349
14. Dudley R.A., Johansen K.L., Brand R., et al. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA. 283:2000;1159-1166
15. Milstein A., Galvin R.S., Delbanco S.F., et al. Improving the safety of health care the leapfrog initiative. Eff Clin Pract. 3:2000;313-316
16. Birkmeyer J.D., Finlayson E.V., Birkmeyer C.M. Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. Surgery. 130:2001;415-422
17. Romano P.S. Can administrative data be used to compare the quality of health care? Med Care Rev. 50:1993;451-477
18. Goodney P.P., Stukel T.A., Lucas F.L., et al. Hospital volume, length of stay, and readmission rates in high-risk surgery. Ann Surg. 238:2003;161-167