Modelling change: New opportunities in the analysis of microgenetic data

Infant and Child Development

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 119-134

  Cheshire, Andrea ^a   Muldoon, Kevin P ^b   Francis, Brian ^c   Lewis, Charlie N ^a   Ball, Linden J ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Change; Cognitive development; Microgenetic; Modelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847633145     PISSN: 15227227     EISSN: 15227219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/icd.498     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Agresti, A., Booth, J., Hobert, J. P., & Caffo, B. (2000). Random effects modelling of categorical response data. Sociological Methodology, 30, 27-80.
2. Aitkin, M., & Alfo, M. (1998). Regression models for binary longitudinal responses. Statistics and Computing, 8, 289-307.
3. Blöte, A. W., Resing, W. C. M., Mazer, P., & van Noort, D. A. (1999). Young children's organisational strategies on a same-different task: A microgenetic study and a training study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 21-43.
4. Blöte, A. W., van Otterloo, S. G., Stevenson, C. E., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2004). Discovery and maintenance of many-to-one counting strategy in 4-year-olds: A microgenetic study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 83-102.
5. Cheshire, A., Ball, L. J., & Lewis, C. N. (2005). Self-explanation, feedback and the development of analogical reasoning skills: Microgenetic evidence for a metacognitive processing account. In B. G. Bara, L. W. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarellli (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 435-441). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Clogg, C. C. (1995). Latent class models. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg, & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modelling for social and behavioural sciences (pp. 311-359). New York: Plenum.
7. Collett, D. (1991). Modelling binary data. London: Chapman & Hall.
8. Edwards, D. (2000). Introduction to graphical modelling (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
9. Firth, D. (1991). Generalized linear models. In D. V. Hinkley, N. Reid, & E. J. Snell (Eds.), Statistical theory and modelling (pp. 55-82). London: Chapman & Hall.
10. Francis, B., Green, M., & Payne, C. (Eds.). (1993). The GUM system release 4 manual. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.
12. Jordan, N. C., Hanich, L. B., & Kaplan, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of mathematical competencies in children with specific mathematics difficulties versus children with comorbid mathematics and reading difficulties. Child Development, 74, 834-850.
13. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language: A study of determiners and reference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Kuhn, D., & Phelps, E. (1982). The development of problem-solving strategies. Advances in Child Development, 17, 1-44.
15. Lavelli, M., Pantoja, A. P. F., Hsu, H., Messinger, D., & Fogel, A. (2005). Using microgenetic designs to study change processes. In D. M. Teti (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in developmental science (pp. 40-65). Oxford: Blackwell.
16. McCulloch, C. E., & Searle, S. R. (2000). Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models. New York: Wiley.
17. Miller, P. H., & Coyle, T. R. (1999). Developmental change: Lessons from microgenesis. In E. K. Scholnick, K. Nelson, S. A. Gelman, & Miller, P. H. (Eds.), Conceptual development: Piaget's legacy (pp. 209-239). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Moskowitz, D. S., & Hershberger, S. L. (Eds.). (2002). Modelling intraindividual variability with repeated measures data. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Namy, L. L., Campbell, A. L., & Tomasello, M. (2004). The changing role of iconicity in non-verbal symbol learning: A u-shaped trajectory in the acquisition of arbitrary gestures. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 37-56.
20. Opfer, J. E., & Siegler, R. S. (2004). Revisiting preschoolers' living things concept: A microgenetic analysis of conceptual change in basic biology. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 301-332.
21. Siegler, R. S. (1995). How does change occur: A microgenetic study of number conservation. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 225-273.
22. Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Siegler, R. S. (2004). U-shaped interest in U-shaped development-and what it means. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 1-10.
24. Siegler, R. S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.) & D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th edn.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
25. Siegler, R. S., & Svetina, M. (2002). A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of matrix completion: Comparing short-term and long-term change. Child Development, 73, 793-809.
26. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modelling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Taylor, J., & Cox, B. D. (1997). Microgenetic analysis of group based solution of complex two-step mathematical word problems by fourth graders. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 183-226.
28. Tunteler, E., & Resing, W. C. M. (2002). Spontaneous analogical transfer in 4-year-olds: A microgenetic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 149-166.
29. van Geert, P. (2002). Developmental dynamics, intentional action, and fuzzy sets. In N. Granott, & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 319-343). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.