A relative trust-region algorithm for independent component analysis

Neurocomputing

Volumn 70, Issue 7-9, 2007, Pages 1502-1510

  Choi, Heeyoul ^a   Choi, Seungjin ^a  

^a Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Blind source separation; Gradient descent learning; Independent component analysis; Relative optimization; Trust region methods

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; OPTIMIZATION;

GRADIENT-DESCENT LEARNING; NEWTON-TYPE ALGORITHMS; RELATIVE OPTIMIZATION; TRUST-REGION METHODS;

INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JAPAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 33847401464     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2006.03.018     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. P.A. Absil, C.G. Baker, K.A. Gallivan. Trust-region methods on Riemannian manifolds, Technical Report FSU-CSIT-04-13, School of Computational Science, Florida State University, 2004.
2. Akuzawa T. Extended quasi-Newton method for the ICA. Proceedings of the ICA. Helsinki, Finland (2000) 521-525
3. Amari S. Natural gradient works efficiently in learning. Neural Comput. 10 2 (1998) 251-276
4. S. Amari, A. Cichocki, Adaptive blind signal processing-neural network approaches, Proceedings of the IEEE, Special Issue on Blind Identification and Estimation, vol. 86 (10), 1998, pp. 2026-2048.
5. Amari S., Cichocki A., and Yang H.H. A new learning algorithm for blind signal separation. In: Touretzky D.S., Mozer M.C., and Hasselmo M.E. (Eds). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 8 (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge 757-763
6. Cardoso J.F. Infomax and maximum likelihood for source separation. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 4 4 (1997) 112-114
7. Cardoso J.F. Learning in manifolds. the case of source separation. Proceedings of SSAP. Portland, Oregon (1998)
8. Cardoso J.F., and Laheld B.H. Equivariant adaptive source separation. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 44 12 (1996) 3017-3030
9. Choi H., and Choi S. Relative trust-region learning for ICA. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Philadelphia, PA (2005)
10. Choi H., Kim S., and Choi S. Trust-region learning for ICA. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Budapest, Hungary (2004) 41-46
11. Choi S., Cichocki A., and Amari S. Equivariant nonstationary source separation. Neural Networks 15 1 (2002) 121-130
12. Choi S., Cichocki A., Park H.M., and Lee S.Y. Blind source separation and independent component analysis: a review. Neural Inf. Process. Lett. Rev. 6 1 (2005) 1-57
13. Cichocki A., and Amari S. Adaptive Blind Signal and Image Processing: Learning Algorithms and Applications (2002), Wiley, New York
14. Fiori S. Quasi-geodesic neural learning algorithms over the orthogonal group: a tutorial. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 6 (2005) 743-781
15. Hyvärinen A. Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 10 3 (1999) 626-634
16. Hyvärinen A., Karhunen J., and Oja E. Independent Component Analysis (2001), Wiley, New York
17. Lee T.W. Independent Component Analysis: Theory and Applications (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
18. Lee T.W., Girolami M., Bell A., and Sejnowski T. A unifying information-theoretic framework for independent component analysis. Int. J. Math. Comput. Modeling 39 11 (2000) 1-21
19. Liebermeister W. Linear modes of gene expression determined by independent component analysis. Bioinformatics 18 1 (2002) 51-60
20. Nocedal J., and Wright S.J. Numerical Optimization (1999), Springer, Berlin
21. Zibulevsky M. Blind source separation with relative Newton method. Proceedings of the ICA. Nara, Japan (2003) 897-902