GA-fuzzy control of smart base isolated benchmark building using supervisory control technique

Advances in Engineering Software

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 453-465

  Kim, Hyun Su ^a   Roschke, Paul N ^b  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^b Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Benchmark control problem; MR damper; Multi objective genetic algorithm; Smart base isolation; Supervisory fuzzy control

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; BENCHMARKING; BUILDINGS; REAL TIME CONTROL; SCADA SYSTEMS; SEISMIC DESIGN;

BENCHMARK CONTROL PROBLEM; MR DAMPER; MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; SMART BASE ISOLATION; SUPERVISORY FUZZY CONTROL;

FUZZY CONTROL;

EID: 33847371096     PISSN: 09659978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hall J.F., Heaton T.H., Halling M.W., and Wald D.J. Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings. Earthquake Spectra 11 4 (1995) 569-605
2. Heaton T.H., Hall J.F., Wald D.J., and Halling M.W. Response of high-rise and base-isolated buildings in a hypothetical Mw 7.0 blind thrust earthquake. Science 267 (1995) 206-211
3. Kelly J.M. The role of damping in seismic isolation. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 28 (1999) 3-20
4. Kelly JM. The current state of base isolation in the United States. In: Second world conference on structural control, Kyoto, Japan, 1999. p. 1043-52.
5. Spencer Jr. B.F., Johnson E.A., and Ramallo J.C. Smart isolation for seismic control. JSME Int J Ser C 43 4 (2000) 704-711
6. Johnson EA, Ramallo JC, Spencer Jr BF, Sain MK. Intelligent base isolation systems. 2nd World Conf on structural control, Kyoto, Japan, 1999. p. 367-76.
7. Narasimhan S., Nagarajaiah S., Johnson E.A., and Gavin H.P. Smart base isolated benchmark building Part I: Problem definition. J Struct Control Health Monitor 13 (2006) 573-588
8. Narasimhan S., and Nagarajaiah S. Phase I smart base isolated benchmark building - sample controllers for linear isolation system: Part II. J Struct Control Health Monitor 13 (2006) 589-604
9. Fujita T., Shimazaki M., Yutaka H., Aizawa S., Higashino M., and Haniuda N. Semiactive seismic isolation system using controllable friction damper. Bull Earthquake Resistant Struct Res Center 27 (1994) 21-31
10. Yoshioka H., Ramallo J.C., and Spencer B.F. Smart base isolation strategies employing magnetorheological dampers. J Eng Mech ASCE 128 5 (2002) 540-551
11. Spencer B.F., and Nagarajaiah S. State of the art of structural control. J Struct Eng ASCE 129 7 (2003) 845-856
12. Michael D.S., and Michael C.C. Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review. Eng Struct 21 (1999) 469-487
13. Spencer B.F., Dyke S.J., Sain M.K., and Carlson J.D. Phenomenological model of a magnetorheological damper. J Eng Mech ASCE 123 3 (1997) 230-238
14. Carlson JD, Charzan MJ. Magnetorheological fluid dampers. US Patent No. 5,277,281, 1994.
15. Takagi K, Tani A, Kawamura H, Takizawa A. An evolutionary intelligent fuzzy optimal active hybrid control system of building structures. Workshop on smart structural systems, US-Japan cooperative research programs on smart structural systems, Tsukuba, Japan, 2002.
16. Park K.S., Koh H.M., Ok S.Y., and Seo C.W. Fuzzy supervisory control of earthquake-excited cable-stayed bridges. Eng Struct 27 7 (2005) 1086-1100
17. Park K.S., Koh H.M., and Ok S.Y. Active control of earthquake excited structures using fuzzy supervisory technique. Adv Eng Software 33 (2002) 761-768
18. Chekkouri R, Romeral L, Catala J, Aldabas E. Supervisory fuzzy control of non-linear motion systems. In: 7th Int workshop on advanced motion control, Maribor, Slovenia, 2002. p. 341-6.
19. Sbarbaro D, Segovia JP. Application of a supervisory fuzzy controller for controlling nonlinear processes. Fifth IEEE Int Conf on fuzzy systems, New Orleans, LA, 1996. p. 575-9.
20. Reigles D.G., and Symans M.D. Supervisory fuzzy control of a base isolated benchmark building utilizing a neuro-fuzzy model of controllable fluid viscous dampers. J Struct Control Health Monitor 13 (2006) 724-747
21. Deb K, Pratap A, Agrawal S, Meyarivan T. A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. Technical Report No. 200001, Kanpur: Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India, 2000.
22. Schaffer JD. Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms. In: First international conference on genetic algorithms, Hillsdale, NJ, 1985. p. 93-100.
23. Horn J., Nafpliotis N., and Goldberg D.E. A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization. First IEEE conference on evolutionary computation, Orlando, FL (1994), IEEE Press 82-87
24. Fonseca C.M., and Fleming P.J. Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalization. Genetic algorithms: fifth international conference (1993), Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA p. 416-23
25. Wen Y.K. Method of random vibration of hysteretic systems. J Eng Mech ASCE 102 2 (1976) 249-263
26. Goldberg D.E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning (1989), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reissue
27. Jangid R.S., and Kelly J.M. Base isolation for near-fault motions. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 30 (2001) 691-707
28. Jang J.R., Sun C.T., and Mizutani E. Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing. Prentice-Hall International Inc. (1997)
29. Furuhashi T, Miyata Y, Nakaoka K, Uchikawa Y. A new approach to genetic based machine learning and an efficient finding of fuzzy rules. In: Proc of the 1994 IEEE world wisemen/women workshop of fuzzy logic and neural networks/genetic algorithms, 1994. p. 114-22.