Prescriptive authority and preferences for training

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 104-111

  Fagan, Thomas J ^a   Ax, Robert K ^b   Liss, Miriam ^c   Resnick, Robert J ^d   Moody, Sara ^d  

^a NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Mary Washington ^*

^c Randolph Macobn College   (United States)

^d RANDOLPH MACON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Prescriptive authority; Psychopharmacology; Training

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847321166     PISSN: 07357028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.38.1.104     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Albee, G. W. (2002). Just say no to psychotropic drags! Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 635-648.
2. American Psychological Association. (1996). Recommended postdoctoral training in psychopharmacology for prescription privileges and model Legislation for prescriptive authority. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Ax, R. K., Forbes, M. R., & Thompson, D. D. (1997). Prescription privileges for psychologists: A survey of predoctoral interns and directors of training. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 509-514.
4. Ax, R. K., & Resnick, R. J. (2001). Prescription privileges: An immodest proposal. Monitor on Psychology, 32(3), 53-54.
5. Balster, R. (1990, Spring). Predoctoral psychopharmacology training for clinical/counseling psychologists. Psychopharmacology Newsletter, 23, 1-4.
6. Barnett. J. E., & Neel, M. L. (2000). Must all psychologists study psychopharmacology? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 619-627.
7. Bickman, L. (1999). Practice makes perfect and other myths about mental health services. American Psychologist, 54, 965-978.
8. Doswell, D. L., & Litwin, W. J. (1992). Limited prescription privileges for psychologists: A 1-year follow-up. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23, 108-113.
9. Burns, S. M., DeLeon, P. H., Chemtob, C. M., Welch, B. L., & Samuels, R. M. (1988). Psychotropic medication: A new technique for psychology? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, and Training, 25, 508-515.
10. DeLeon, P. H. (1988). Public policy and public service: Our professional duty. American Psychologist, 43, 309-315.
11. deMayo, R. A. (2002). Academic interests and experiences of doctoral students in clinical psychology: Implications for prescription privilege training. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 499-501.
12. Dobson, K. S., & Dozois, D. J. (2001) Professional psychology and the prescription debate: Still not ready to go to the alter. Canadian Psychology, 42, 131-135.
13. Fagan, T. J., Ax, R. K., Resnick, R. J., Liss, M., Johnson, R., & Forbes, M. R. (2004). Attitudes among interns and directors of training: Who wants to prescribe, who doesn't, and why. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 345-356.
14. Fox, R. E., Schweilitz, F. D., & Barclay, A. G. (1992). A proposed curriculum for psychopharmacology training for professional psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23, 216-219.
15. Hayes, S. C., Walser, R. D., & Bach, P. (2002). Prescription privileges for psychologists: Constituencies and conflicts. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 697-708.
16. Hofflich, S. A., Grandlin, L., Blatt-Eisengart, H., & Creed, T. A. (2004). Voices of the future: Graduate students' views on training to prescribe. The Clinical Psychologist, 57, 8-13.
17. Kilbey, M. M., Brown, R. T., Coursey, R. D., Eisdorfer, C., France, C., Johnson, D. L., et al. (1995, December). Report of the BEA working group to develop a Level 1 curriculum for psychopharmacology education and training: Curriculum for Level 1 training in psychopharmacology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Krosnick, J. A. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 537-567.
19. McGrath, R. E., Berman, S., LeVine, E., Mantell, E., Rom-Rymer, B., Sammons, M., et al. (2005). Guidelines for collaborative and independent practice in pharmacotherapy. Unpublished manuscript, American Psychological Association Division 55 (American Society for the Advancement of Pharmocotherapy), Winston-Salem, NC.
20. National Register. (2005, October 21). Designated postdoctoral programs in psycho-pharmacology. Retrieved June 20, 2006, from http://www.nationalregister.org/RxP_designate.htm
21. Norcross, J. C., Hedges, M., & Prochaska, J. O. (2002). The face of 2010: A Delphi poll on the future of psychotherapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 316-322.
22. Robiner, W. N., Bearman, D. L., Berman, M., Grove, W. M., Colón, E., Armstrong, J., et al. (2003). Prescriptive authority for psychologists: Despite deficits in education and knowledge? Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 10, 211-221.
23. Sammons, M. T., Gorny, S. W., Zinner, E. S., & Allen, R. P. (2000). Prescriptive authority for psychologists: A consensus of support. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 604-609.
24. St-Pierre, E. S., & Melnyk, W. T. (2004). The prescription privilege debate in Canada: The voices of today's and tomorrow's psychologists. Canadian Psychology, 45, 284-292.
25. Taylor, R. R. (2006, January 21). Prescribing psychoactive medications in public service psychology: Demographics of applicants. Report presented to the American Psychological Association Division 18 Executive Committee, Washington, DC.
26. Tulkin, S. R., & Stock, W. (2004). A model for predoctoral psychopharmacology training: Shaping a new frontier in clinical psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 151-157.
27. Wagner, M. K. (2002). The high cost of prescription privileges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 677-680.
28. Walters, G. D. (2001). A meta-analysis of opinion data on the prescription privileges debate. Canadian Psychology, 42, 119-125.