Evaluation of the aerobic biodegradation of trichloroethylene via response surface methodology

Environment International

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 338-345

  Cutright, Teresa J ^a   Meza, Liliana ^a  

^a University of Akron   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodegradation; Response surface methodology; Trichloroethylene

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; BIODEGRADATION; POLYNOMIALS; SURFACE STRUCTURE; TOLUENE;

RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY (RSM); TERMINAL ELECTRON ACCEPTOR (TEA); TRICHLOROETHYLENE;

ETHYLENE;

HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; TOLUENE; TRICHLOROETHYLENE;

BACTERIUM; BIODEGRADATION; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; METHODOLOGY; TOLUENE; TRICHLOROETHYLENE;

AEROBIC METABOLISM; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL METABOLISM; BIODEGRADATION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGRADATION KINETICS; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ENZYME INDUCTION; EVALUATION; MICROBIAL DEGRADATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 33847309929     PISSN: 01604120     EISSN: 18736750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2006.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adinarayanak K., Ellaiah P., Srinivasulu B., Devi R., and Adinarayana G. Response surface methodological approach to optimize the nutritional parameters for neomycin production by Streptomyces marinensis under solid-state fermentation. Process Biochem 38 (2003) 1565-1572
2. Andersson M., and Adlercreutz P. Evaluation of simple enzyme kinetics by response surface modeling. Biotechnol Tech 13 (1999) 903-907
3. Bayraktar E. Response surface optimization of the separation of dl-tryptophan using an emulsion liquid membrane. Process Biochem 37 (2001) 169-175
4. Bouchez M., Blanchet D., and Vandecastle J.P. Degradation of PAHs by pure strains and by defined strain associations: inhibition phenomena and cometabolism. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 43 (1995) 156-164
5. Choudhury L.A., and El-Baradie M.A. Machinability assessment of inconel 718 by factorial design of experiment coupled with response surface methodology. J Mater Process Technol 95 (1999) 30-39
6. Cookson Jr. J.R. Bioremediation engineering: design and application (1995), McGraw-Hill, New York 75-82
7. El-Helow E.R., Abdel-Fattah Y.R., Ghanem K., and Mohamad E.A. Application of response surface methodology for optimizing the activity of an aprE-driven gene expression system in Bacillus subtilis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 54 4 (2000) 315-520
8. Guo G.L., Tseng D.H., and Huang S.L. Co-metabolic degradation of trichloroethylene by Pseudomonas putida in a fibrous bed bioreactor. Biotechnol Lett 23 (2001) 1653-1657
9. Khoo L.P., and Chen C.H. Integration of response surface methodology with genetic algorithms. Manuf Technol 18 7 (2001) 483-489
10. Khury A.I., and Cornell J.A. Response surfaces (1987), Marcel Dekker, New York 120
11. Lou W., and Nkai S. Application of artificial neural networks for predicting the thermal inactivation of bacteria: a combined effect of temperature, pH and water activity. Food Res Int 34 (2001) 573-579
12. McCarty P.L., Golts M.N., Hopkins G.D., Dolan M.E., Allan J.P., Kawakami B.T., et al. Full-scale evaluation of in-situ cometabolic degradation of TCE in groundwater through toluene injection. Environ Sci Technol 32 1 (1998) 88-100
13. Meza L., Cutright T.J., El-Zahab B., and Wang P. Aerobic biodegradation of trichloroethylene using a consortium of five bacteria strains. Biotechnol Lett 25 (2003) 1925-1932
14. Montgomery D.C. Design and analysis of experiments (2001), John Wiley & Sons, New York
15. Mu X.Q., Xu Y., Nie Y., Ouyang J., and Sun Z.H. Candida prapsilosis CCTCC M203011 and the optimization of fermentation medium for stereoinversion of (s)-1-phenol-1,2-ethanediol. Process Biochem 40 (2005) 2345-2350
16. Mulliss R.M., Revitt D.M., and Shutes R. A statistical approach for the assessment of the toxic influences of Gammarus pulex (Amphipoda) and Asellus aquaticus (Isopoda) exposed to urban aquatic discharges. Water Res 30 5 (1996) 1237-1243
17. Murthy M., Swaminathan T., Rakshit S.K., and Kosugi Y. Statistical optimization of lipase catalyzed hydrolysis of methyloleate by response surface methodology. Bioprocess Eng 22 (2000) 35-39
18. Myers R.H., and Montomery D.C. Response surface methodology: process optimization using designed experiments (2002), John Wiley & Sons, New York
19. Rigas F., Dritsa V., Marchant R., Papadopoulou K., Avramides F.J., and Hatzianestis I. Biodegradation of lindane by Pleurous ostreatus via central composite design. Environ Int 31 (2005) 191-196
20. Rossi F. Blending response surface methodology and principal components analysis to match a target product. Food Qual Prefer 12 (2001) 457-465
21. Sadhukhan A.K., Murthy M.V.R., Kumar R.A., Mohna E.V.S., Vandana S., Bhar G., et al. Optimization of mycophenolic acid production in solid state fermentation using response surface methodology. J Ind Microbiol Biotech 22 (1999) 33-38
22. Sheeja R.J., and Murugesan T. Studies on the biodegradation of phenol using response surface methodology. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 77 (2002) 1219-1230
23. Shi X.Y., and Yu H.Q. Response surface analysis on the effect of cell concentration and light intensity on hydrogen production by Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. Process Biochem 40 (2005) 2475-2481
24. Vohra A., and Satyanarayana T. Statistical optimization of the medium components by response surface methodology to enhance protease production by Pichia anomala. Process Biochem 37 (2002) 999-1004
25. Xiong Y.A., Liu J.Z., Song H., and Ji L.N. Enchanced production of extracellular ribonuclease from Aspergillus niger by optimization of culture conditions using response surface methodology. Biochem Eng J 21 (2004) 27-32