The impact of montmorillonite clay addition on the in vitro wear resistance of a glass-ionomer restorative

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 309-317

  Dowling, Adam H ^a   Fleming, Garry J P ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Glass ionomer restoratives; Montmorillonite clay; Optical profilometry; Wear resistance

Indexed keywords

12 AMINODODECANOIC ACID; 12-AMINODODECANOIC ACID; BENTONITE; CALCIUM; CHEMFIL SUPERIOR; GLASS IONOMER; LAURIC ACID DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; FRICTION; MATERIALS TESTING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BENTONITE; CALCIUM; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FRICTION; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; LAURIC ACIDS; MATERIALS TESTING;

EID: 33847279743     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Sheldon T., and Treasure E. Dental restoration: what type of filling?. Effective Health Care 5 (1999) 1-11
2. Darvell B.W. The corrosion of silver amalgam-a photometric method. Journal of Dentistry 1 (1973) 255-260
3. Lutz F. The postamalgam age. Operative Dentistry 20 (1995) 218-222
4. Tyas M.J. Dental amalgam-what are the alternatives?. International Dental Journal 44 (1994) 303-308
5. Christensen G.J. Restoration of pediatric posterior teeth. Journal of the American Dental Association 127 (1996) 106-108
6. Hotz P., McLean J.W., and Wilson A.D. The bonding of glass ionomer cements to metal and tooth structures. British Dental Journal 142 (1977) 41-47
7. Wilson A.D., and Kent B.E. Dentistry, the glass ionomer cement. British Dental Journal 132 (1972) 133-135
8. Naasan M.A., and Watson T.F. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. American Journal of Dentistry 11 (1998) 36-45
9. Mount G.J. Glass ionomers: a review of their current status. Operative Dentistry 24 (1999) 115-124
10. Mair L.H., Stolarski T.A., Vowles R.W., and Lloyd C.H. Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. report of a workshop. Journal of Dentistry 24 (1996) 141-148
11. Cvar J.F., and Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. United States Public Health Service Publication #790-244 (1971), US Government Printing Office, San Francisco
12. Leinfelder K.F., Taylor D.F., Barkmeier W.W., and Goldberg A.J. Quantitative wear measurement of posterior composite resins. Dental Materials 2 (1986) 198-201
13. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. International Dental Journal 30 (1980) 347-357
14. Taylor D.F., Bayne S.C., Sturdevant J.R., and Wilder A.D. Comparison of direct and indirect methods for analysing wear of posterior composite restorations. Dental Materials 5 (1989) 157-160
15. McDowell G.C., Bloem T.J., Lang B.R., and Asgar K. In vivo wear. Part 1: the Michigan computer-graphic measuring system. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 60 (1988) 112-120
16. Conry J.P., Beyer J.P., Pintado M.R., and Douglas W.H. Measurement of preventative resin restorations using computer profilometry. Journal of Dentistry for Children 59 (1992) 177-181
17. DeLong R., and Douglas W.H. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. Journal of Dental Research 62 (1983) 32-36
18. de Gee A.J., Pallav P., and Davidson C.L. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress-bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. Journal of Dental Research 65 (1986) 654-658
19. Leinfelder K.F., Beaudreau R.W., and Mazer R.B. An in vitro device for predicting clinical wear. Quintessence International 20 (1989) 755-761
20. Condon J.R., and Ferracane J.L. A new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dental Materials 12 (1996) 218-226
21. Pelka M., Ebert J., Schneider H., Kramer N., and Petschelt A. Comparison of two- and three-body wear of glass-ionomers and composites. European Journal of Oral Sciences 104 (1996) 132-137
22. de Gee A.J., van Duinen R.N.B., Werner A., and Davidson C.L. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. Journal of Dental Research 75 (1996) 1613-1619
23. Kunzelmann K.H., Bürkle V., and Bauer C. Two-body and three-body wear of glass ionomer cements. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 13 (2003) 434-440
24. de Gee A.J., Leloup G., Werner A., Vreven J., and Davidson C.L. Structural integrity of resin-modified glass ionomers affected by the delay or omission of light activation. Journal of Dental Research 77 (1998) 1658-1663
25. van Duinen R.N.B., Kleverlaan C.J., de Gee A.J., Werner A., and Feilzer A.J. Early and long-term wear of 'fast-set' conventional glass ionomers. Dental Materials 21 (2005) 716-720
26. Dowling A.H., Stamboulis A., and Fleming G.J.P. The influence of montmorillonite clay reinforcement on the performance of a glass ionomer restorative. Journal of Dentistry 34 (2006) 802-810
27. ® Superior (Dentsply DeTrey, Kanstanz, Germany).
28. Utracki L.A. Basic elements of polymeric nanocomposites technology. In: Utracki L.A. (Ed). Clay-containing polymeric nanocomposites vol. 1 (2004), Rapra Technology, Shropshire 35-256
29. Condon J.R., and Ferracane J.L. Factors effecting dental composite wear in vitro. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 38 (1997) 303-313
30. Condon J.R., and Ferracane J.L. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level and filler treatment. Journal of Dental Research 76 (1997) 1405-1411
31. Correr G.M., Alonso R.C.B., Sobrinho L.C., Puppin-Rontani R.M., and Ferracane J.L. In vitro wear of resin-based materials-simultaneous corrosive and abrasive wear. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 78 (2006) 105-114
32. Turssi C.P., Ferracane J.L., and Ferracane L.L. Wear and fatigue behaviour of nano-structured dental resin composites. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 78 (2006) 196-203
33. Sulong M.Z.A.M., and Aziz R.A. Wear of materials used in dentistry: a review of the literature. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 63 (1990) 342-349
34. DeLong R. Intra-oral restorative materials wear: rethinking the current approaches: how to measure wear. Dental Materials 22 (2006) 702-711
35. Archard J.F. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. Journal of Applied Physics 24 (1953) 981-988
36. DeLong R., Sakaguchi R.L., Douglas W.H., and Pintado M.R. The wear of dental amalgam in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dental Materials 1 (1985) 238-242
37. Ferracane J.L. Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices?. Dental Materials 22 (2006) 689-692
38. Heintze S.D. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dental Materials 22 (2006) 712-734
39. Condon J.R., and Ferracane J.L. Evaluation of seven commercial composites using new in vitro wear simulator. Journal of Dental Research 81 (2002) A337 [abstract number 2683]
40. Sorensen J.A., and Pham M. In vitro wear of composite resins processed with various systems. Journal of Dental Research 81 (2002) A324 [abstract number 2578]
41. Seghi R., Pollock M., and Lannutti J. Wear resistance of various nano-structured composites. Journal of Dental Research 81 (2002) A414 [abstract number 3358]
42. Pintado M.R., Anderson G.A., DeLong R., and Douglas W.H. Variation in tooth wear in young adults over a two-year period. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 77 (1997) 313-320
43. Fischer H. Polymer nanocomposites: from fundamental research to specific applications. Materials Science and Engineering: C 23 (2003) 763-772
44. Dasari A., Yu Z.Z., Mai Y.W., Hu G.H., and Varlet J. Clay exfoliation and organic modification of nylon 6 nanocomposites processed by different routes. Composites Science and Technology 65 (2005) 2314-2328