Ethical challenges

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 76-78

  Cooksy, Leslie J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847251532     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: 15570878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1098214006298063     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Busch-Rossnagel, N. A. (2006). First, do no harm: Culturally centered measurement for early intervention. In J. E. Trimble & C. B. Fisher (Eds.), The handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations and communities (pp. 51-64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Chin, J. L., Mio, J. S., & Iwamasa, G. Y. (2006). Ethical conduct of research with Asian and Pacific Islander American populations. In J. E. Trimble & C. B. Fisher (Eds.), The handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations and communities (pp. 117-135). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Conner, R. F. (2004). Developing and implementing culturally competent evaluation: A discussion of multicultural validity in two HIV prevention programs for Latinos. In M. Thompson-Robinson, R. Hopson, & S. SenGupta (Eds.), New directions for evaluation: No. 102. In search of cultural competence in evaluation: Toward principles and practices (pp. 51-65). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Elliott, K. A. G. & Urquiza, A. J. (2006). Ethical research with ethnic minorities in the child welfare system. In J. E. Trimble & C. B. Fisher (Eds.), The handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations and communities (pp. 181-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Fisher, C. B. & Ragsdale, K. (2006). Goodness-of-fit ethics for multicultural research. In J. E. Trimble & C. B. Fisher (Eds.), The handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations and communities (pp. 3-25). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Harkness, J. (2003). Questionnaire translation. In J. Harkness, F. Van de Vijver, P. P. Mohler (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 35-56). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Hopson, R. K. (Ed.). (2000). New directions for evaluation: No. 86. How and why language matters in evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Hopson, R. K., Lucas, K. J., & Peterson, J. A. (2000). HIV/AIDS talk: Implications for prevention intervention and evaluation. In R. K. Hopson (Ed.), New directions for evaluation: No. 86. How and why language matters in evaluation (pp. 29-42). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Kaminsky, A. (2000). Beyond the literal: Metaphors and why they matter. In R. K. Hopson (Ed.), New directions for evaluation: No. 86. How and why language matters in evaluation (pp. 69-80). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Kirkhart, K. & Hopson, R. (2006, June). Strengthening evaluation through cultural relevance and cultural competence. Training session presented at the Centers for Disease Control/American Evaluation Association Summer Evaluation Institute, Atlanta, GA.
11. Madison, A. M. (2000). Language in defining social problems and in evaluating social programs. In R. K. Hopson (Ed.), New directions for evaluation: No. 86. How and why language matters in evaluation (pp. 17-28). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Mertens, D. M. (1999). Inclusive evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20(1), 1-14.
13. Mohatt, G. V., & Thomas, L. R. (2006). "I wonder, why would you do it that way?" Ethical dilemmas in doing participatory research with Alaska Native communities. In J. E. Trimble & C. B. Fisher (Eds.), The handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations and communities (pp. 93-115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Rallis, S. F. & Rossman, G. B. (2000). Dialogue for learning: Evaluator as critical friend. In R. K. Hopson (Ed.), New directions for evaluation: No. 86. How and why language matters in evaluation (pp. 81-92). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Thompson-Robinson, M., Hopson, R., & SenGupta, S. (Eds.). (2004). In search of cultural competence in evaluation: Toward principles and practices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.