Mirror-image relations in category learning

Visual Cognition

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 211-237

  Rentschler, Ingo ^a   Jüttner, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LUMINANCE; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 33847239141     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280600574784     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Ashby, F. G. (1989) Stochastic general recognition theory. Human information processing: Measures, mechanisms, and models, pp. 435-457. Elsevier, Amsterdam
2. Ashby, F. G. and Maddox, W. (1993) Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37, pp. 372-400.
3. Ballard, D. H. and Brown, C. M. (1982) Computer vision, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
4. Barlow, H. B. and Reeves, B. C. (1979) The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays. Vision Research, 19, pp. 783-793.
5. Baylis, G. C. and Driver, J. (2001) Shape-coding in IT cells generalises over contrast and mirror reversal, but not figure-ground reversal. Nature Neuroscience, 4, pp. 937-942.
6. Biederman, I. and Cooper, E. E. (1991) Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception, 20, pp. 585-593.
7. Bornstein, M. H., Gross, C. G. and Wolf, J. Z. (1978) Perceptual similarity of mirror images in infancy. Cognition, 6, pp. 89-116.
8. Brown, J. V. and Ettlinger, G. (1983) Intermanual transfer of mirror-image discrimination by monkeys. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, pp. 119-124.
9. Bruner, J. (1957) On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, pp. 123-152.
10. Bunke, H. (2000) Graph matching for visual object recognition. Spatial Vision, 13, pp. 335-340.
11. Caelli, T. and Bischof, W. F. (1997) Machine learning and image interpretation, Plenum Press, New York
12. Caelli, T. and Dreier, A. (1994) Variations on the evidence-based object recognition theme. Pattern Recognition, 27, pp. 1231-1248.
13. Campbell, R., Walker, J., Benson, P. J., Wallace, S., Coleman, M., Michelotti, J. and Baron-Cohen, S. (1999) When does the inner-face advantage in familiar face recognition arise and why?. Visual Cognition, 6, pp. 197-216.
14. Carey, S. and Diamond, R. (1977) From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. Science, 195, pp. 312-314.
15. Carey, S. and Diamond, R. (1994) Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children?. Visual Cognition, 1, pp. 253-274.
16. Corballis, M. and Beale, I. L. (1976) The psychology of left and right, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ
17. Corballis, M. C. and Beale, I. L. (1967) Interocular transfer following simultaneous discrimination of mirror-image stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 9, pp. 605-606.
18. D'Amato, M. R., Salmon, D. P. and Colombo, M. (1985) Extent and limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, pp. 35-51.
19. Davidoff, J. and Warrington, E. K. (1999) The bare bones of object recognition: Implications of a case of object recognition impairment. Neuropsychologia, 37, pp. 279-292.
20. Davidoff, J. and Warrington, E. K. (2001) A particular difficulty in discriminating between mirror images. Neuropsychologia, 39, pp. 1022-1036.
21. Davidson, H. P. (1935) A study of the confusing letters b, d, p, q. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 47, pp. 458-468.
22. Eliel, E. L., Wilen, S. H. and Doyle, M. P. (2001) Basic organic stereochemistry, John Wiley, New York
23. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M. and Tanaka, J. W. (1998) What is "special" about face perception?. Psychological Review, 105, pp. 482-498.
24. Fiser, J. and Biederman, I. (2001) Invariance of long-term visual priming to scale, reflection, translation, and hemisphere. Vision Research, 41, pp. 221-234.
25. Gauthier, I., Curran, T., Curby, K. M. and Collins, D. (2003) Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, pp. 428-432.
26. Gauthier, I. and Tarr, M. J. (2002) Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: Bridging brain and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, pp. 431-446.
27. Gobet, F. and Simon, H. A. (1996) Recall of random and distorted positions: Implications for the theory of expertise. Memory and Cognition, 24, pp. 493-503.
28. Gross, C. G. and Bornstein, M. H. (1978) Left and right in science and art. Leonardo, 11, pp. 29-38.
29. Hinton, G. E. and Parsons, L. M. (1988) Scene-based and viewer-centered representations for comparing shapes. Cognition, 30, pp. 1-35.
30. Hollard, V. D. and Delius, J. D. (1982) Rotational invariance in visual pattern recognition by pigeons and humans. Science, 218, pp. 804-806.
31. Jain, A. K. and Hoffman, R. (1988) Evidence-based recognition of 3-D objects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 10, pp. 783-802.
32. Johnson, K. E. and Mervis, C. B. (1997) Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, pp. 248-277.
33. Jolicoeur, P. (1985) The time course to name disoriented objects. Memory and Cognition, 13, pp. 289-303.
34. Jolicoeur, P. (1989) Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, pp. 461-478.
35. Jolicoeur, P., Gluck, M. and Kosslyn, S. M. (1984) Pictures and names: Making the connection. Cognitive Psychology, 16, pp. 243-275.
36. Jüttner, M. (1899) Object recognition, attention and action, Springer
37. Jüttner, M., Caelli, T. and Rentschler, I. (1997) Evidence-based pattern recognition: A structural approach to human perceptual learning and generalization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, pp. 244-258.
38. Jüttner, M., Langguth, B. and Rentschler, I. (2004) The impact of context on pattern category learning and representation. Visual Cognition, 11, pp. 921-945.
39. Jüttner, M. and Rentschler, I. (1996) Reduced perceptual dimensionality in extrafoveal vision. Vision Research, 36, pp. 1007-1022.
40. Jüttner, M. and Rentschler, I. (2000) Scale invariant superiority of foveal vision in perceptual categorization. European Journal of Neuroscience, 12, pp. 353-359.
41. Kahana, M. J. and Bennett, P. J. (1994) Classification and perceived similarity of compound gratings that differ in relative spatial phase. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, pp. 642-656.
42. Kinsbourne, M. (1967) Sameness-difference judgements and the discrimination of obliques in the rat. Psychonomic Science, 7, pp. 183-184.
43. Kolb, B., Wilson, B. and Taylor, L. (1992) Developmental changes in the recognition and comprehension of facial expression: Implications for frontal lobe function. Brain and Cognition, 20, pp. 74-84.
44. Kruschke, J. K. (1992) ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, pp. 22-44.
45. Lawson, R. and Humphreys, G. W. (1998) View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, pp. 1052-1066.
46. Lawson, R. and Jolicoeur, P. (1999) The effects of prior experience on recognition thresholds for plane-disoriented pictures of familiar objects. Memory and Cognition, 27, pp. 751-758.
47. Locher, P. and Wagemans, J. (1993) The effects of element type and spatial grouping on symmetry detection. Perception, 22, pp. 565-587.
48. Lohmann, A., Delius, J. D., Hollard, V. D. and Friesel, M. F. (1988) Discrimination of shape reflections and shape orientations by Columba livia. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 102, pp. 3-13.
49. Mach, E. (1922) Die Analyse der Empfindungen, G. Fischer
50. Mooney, C. M. (1957) Age in the development of closure ability in children. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 11, pp. 219-226.
51. Murray, J. E. (1997) Flipping and spinning: Spatial transformation procedures in the identification of rotated natural objects. Memory and Cognition, 25, pp. 96-105.
52. Nissen, H. W. and McCulloch, T. L. (1937) Equated and non equated stimulus situations in discrimination learning by chimpanzees: I. Comparisons with unlimited response. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 23, pp. 165-189.
53. Noonan, M. and Axelrod, S. (1991) Acquisition of left-right response differentiation in the rat following section of the corpus callosum. Behavioural Brain Research, 46, pp. 135-143.
54. Nosofsky, R. (1991) Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, pp. 3-27.
55. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986) Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, pp. 39-57.
56. de Beeck, H. Op,.Wagemans, J. and Vogels, R. (2001) Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterised shapes. Nature Neuroscience, 4, pp. 1244-1252.
57. Palmer, S. E. and Hemenway, K. (1978) Orientation and symmetry: Effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, pp. 635-649.
58. Palmeri, T. J., Wong, A. C.-N. and Gauthier, I. (2004) Computational approaches to the development of perceptual expertise. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, pp. 378-386.
59. Peters, R. J., Gabbiani, F. and Koch, C. (2003) Human visual object categorization can be described by models with low memory capacity. Vision Research, 43, pp. 2265-2280.
60. Premack, D. (1983) The codes of man and beast. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, pp. 125-167.
61. Priftis, K., Rusconi, E., Umilta, C. and Zorzi, M. (2003) Pure agnosia for mirror stimuli after right inferior parietal lesion. Brain, 126, pp. 908-919.
62. Rentschler, I., Barth, E., Caelli, T., Zetzsche, C. and Jüttner, M. (1996) On the generalization of symmetry relations in visual pattern classification. Human symmetry perception, pp. 237-264. VSP International Science Publishers, Utrecht, The Netherlands
63. Rentschler, I. and Caelli, T. (1990) Synergetics of cognition, pp 233-248. Springer
64. Rentschler, I., Jüttner, M. and Caelli, T. (1994) Probabilistic analysis of human supervised learning and classification. Vision Research, 34, pp. 669-687.
65. Riesenhuber, M. and Poggio, T. (1999) Hierarchical models of object recognition in the cortex. Nature Neurosciences, 2, pp. 1019-1025.
66. Rollenhagen, J. E. and Olson, C. R. (2000) Mirror-image confusion in single neurons of the macaque inferotemporal cortex. Science, 287, pp. 1506-1508.
67. Rosch, E. (1978) Principles of categorization. Cognition and categorization, pp. 27-48. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ
68. Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Gray, W., Johnson, D. and Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, pp. 382-439.
69. Rudel, R. G. and Teuber, H. L. (1963) Discrimination of direction of line in children. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, pp. 892-898.
70. Shepard, R. N. (1987) Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, pp. 1317-1323.
71. Shepard, R. N. and Cooper, L. A. (1982) Mental images and their transformations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
72. Shepard, R. N. and Metzler, J. (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, pp. 701-703.
73. Sutherland, N. S. (1963) Cat's ability to discriminate oblique rectangles. Science, 139, pp. 209-210.
74. Tanaka, J. W., Kay, J. B., Grinnell, E., Stansfield, B. and Szechter, L. (1998) Face recognition in young children: When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Visual Cognition, 5, pp. 479-496.
75. Tanaka, J. W. and Taylor, M. (1991) Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder?. Cognitive Psychology, 23, pp. 457-482.
76. Tarr, M. J. and Pinker, S. (1989) Mental rotation and orientation dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, pp. 233-282.
77. Turnbull, O. H., Beschin, N. and Della Sala, S. (1997) Agnosia for object orientation: Implications for theories of object recognition. Neuropsychologia, 35, pp. 153-163.
78. Turnbull, O. H. and McCarthy, R. A. (1996) Failure to discriminate between mirror-image objects: A case of viewpoint-independent object recognition?. Neurocase, 2, pp. 63-71.
79. Ullman, S., Vidal-Naquet, M. and Sali, E. (2002) Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification. Nature Neuroscience, 5, pp. 682-687.
80. Unzicker, A., Jüttner, M. and Rentschler, I. (1998) Similarity-based models of human visual recognition. Vision Research, 38, pp. 2289-2305.
81. Unzicker, A., Jüttner, M. and Rentschler, I. (1999) Modelling the dynamics of visual classification behaviour. Mathematical Social Sciences, 38, pp. 295-313.
82. Wagemans, J. (1996) Detection of visual symmetries. Human symmetry perception, pp. 237-264. VSP International Science Publishers, Utrecht, The Netherlands
83. Wagemans, J., van Gool, L., Swinnen, V. and van Horebeek, J. (1993) Higher-order structure in regularity detection. Vision Research, 33, pp. 1067-1088.
84. Watson, A. B., Barlow, H. B. and Robson, J. G. (1983) What does the eye see best?. Nature, 302, pp. 419-422.
85. Westheimer, G. (1998) Lines and Gabor functions compared as spatial visual stimuli. Vision Research, 38, pp. 487-491.
86. Wolfe, J. M. and Friedman-Hill, S. R. (1992) On the role of symmetry in visual search. Psychological Science, 3, pp. 194-198.
87. Yee, G. T. (2002) Through the looking glass and what Alice ate there. Journal of Chemical Education, 79, pp. 569-571.