Intrinsic disorder and prote in modifications: Building an SVM predictor for methylation

Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, CIBCB '05

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Daily, Kenneth M ^a   Radivojac, Predrag ^a   Dunker, A Keith ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; AUTOMATA THEORY; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

INTRINSIC DISORDERS; METHYLATION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES (SVM);

PROTEINS;

EID: 33847215114     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/cibcb.2005.1594957     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Paik, W.K. and S. Kim, Enzymatic methylation of protein pabp 1 identified as an arginine fractions from calf thymus nuclei. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1967, 29: p. 14-20.
2. Vucetic, S., et al., DisProt: a database of protein disorder. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21(1): p. 137-140.
3. Paik, W.K. and S. Kim, Enzymology of protein methylation. Yonsei Medical Journal, 1986, 25(3): p. 159-177.
4. Aletta, J.M., T.R. Cimato, and M.J. Ettinger, Protein methylation: a signal event in post-translational modification. Trends Biochem. Sciences, 1998, 23(3): p. 89-91.
5. Najbauer, J. and D. Aswad, Diversity of methyl acceptor proteins in rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells revealed after treatment with adenosine dialdehyde. J. Biol. Chem., 1990, 265: p. 12717-12721.
6. Shi, Y., et al., Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1. Cell, 2004, 119: p. 941-953.
7. Bedford, M.T. and S. Richard, Arginine methylation: an emerging regulator of protein function. Mol. Cell, 2005, 18: p. 263-272.
8. Scorilas, A., et al., Genomic organization, physical mapping, and expression analysis of the human protein arginine methyltransferase 1 gene. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2000, 278: p. 349-359.
9. Najbauer, J., et al., Peptides with sequences similar to glycine, argininerich motifs in proteins interacting with rna are efficiently recognized by methyltransferase(s) modifying arginine in numerous proteins. J. Biol. Chem., 1993, 268: p. 10501-10509.
10. Lachner, M. and T. Jenuwein, The many faces of histone lysine methylation. Curr. Opin. Cell. Bio, 2002, 14(3): p. 286-298.
11. Friesen, W.J., et al., The methylosome, a 20S complex containing JBP1 and pICln, produces dimethylarginine-modified Sm proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol., 2001, 21: p. 8289-8300.
12. Cheng, D., et al., Small molecule regulators of protein arginine methyltransferases. J. Biol. Chem., 2004, 279: p. 23892-23899.
13. Bairoch, A., et al., The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res, 2005, 33 Database Issue: p. D154-9.
14. Murray, K., The occurrence of var epsilon-n-methyl lysine in histones. Biochemistry, 1964, 3: p. 10-15.
15. Strahl, B.D. and C.D. Allis, The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature, 2000, 403(6765): p. 41-45.
16. van Holde, K., Chromatin. 1988, New York: Springer-Verlag.
17. Chuikov, S., et al., Regulation of p53 activity through lysine methylation. Nature, 2004, 432: p. 353-360.
18. Dyson, H.J. and P.E. Wright, Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2005, 6(3): p. 197-208.
19. Fink, A.L., Natively unfolded proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2005, 15(1): p. 35-41.
20. Dunker, A.K., et al., Intrinsically disordered protein. J. Mol. Graph. Model., 2001, 19(1): p. 26-59.
21. Dedmon, M.M., et al., FlgMgains structure in living cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2002, 99(20): p. 12681-12684.
22. Pielaok, C., personal communication. 2005.
23. Dunker, A.K. and Z. Obradovic, The protein trinity - linking function and disorder. Nat. Biotechnol., 2001, 19(9): p. 805-806.
24. Dunker, A.K., et al., Intrinsic disorder and protein function. Biochemistry, 2002, 41(21): p. 6573-6582.
25. Tompa, P., Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem Sci, 2002, 27(527-533).
26. Tompa, P., personal communication. 2004.
27. Daughdrill, G.W., et al., Natively disordered protein, in Protein Folding Handbook, J. Buchner and T. Kiefhaber, Editors. 2005, Wiley-VCH: Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, p. 271-353.
28. Plewczynski, D., et al., AutoMotif server: prediction of single residue post-translational modifications in proteins. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21(10): p. 2525-7.
29. Ong, S.-E., G. Mittler, and M. Mann, Identifying and quantifying in vivo methylation sites by heavy methyl silac. Nat. Methods, 2004, 1: p. 119-126.
30. Vihinen, M., E. Torkkila, and P. Riikonen, Accuracy of protein flexibility predictions. Proteins, 1994, 19: p. 141-149.
31. Eisenberg, D., R.M. Weiss, and T.C. Terwilliger, The hydrophobic moment detects periodicity in protein hydrophobicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. A., 1984, 81: p. 140-144.
32. Wootton, J.C. and S. Federhen, Analysis of compositionally biased regions in sequence databases. Methods Enzymol, 1996, 266: p. 554-571.
33. Daróczy, Z., Generalized information functions. Information and Control, 1970, 16: p. 36-51.
34. Vucetic, S., et al., Flavors of protein disorder. Proteins, 2003, 52: p. 573-584.
35. Obradovic, Z., et al., Predicting intrinsic disorder from amino acid sequence. Proteins, 2003, 53(S6): p. 566-572.
36. Radivojac, P., et al., Protein flexibility and intrinsic disorder. Protein Science, 2004, 13(1): p. 71-80.
37. Altschul, S.F., et al., Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 1997, 25: p. 3389-3402.
38. Joachims, T., Learning to classify text using support vector machines: methods, theory, and algorithms. 2002: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
39. Ashburner, M., et al., Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet., 2000, 25(1): p. 25-29.
40. Berman, H.M., et al., The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res., 2000, 28(1): p. 235-242.
41. Rost, B., et al., Automatic prediction of protein function. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2003, 60(12): p. 2637-2650.
42. Sobolev, V., et al., Automated analysis of interatomic contacts in proteins. Bioinformatics, 1999, 15(4): p. 327-32.
43. Babul, J. and E. Stell wagen, Participation of the protein ligands in the folding of cytochromec. Biochemistry, 1972, 11(7): p. 1195-200.
44. Fisher, W.R., H. Taniuchi, and C.B. Anfinsen, On the role of heme in the formation of the structure of cytochrome c. J Biol Chem, 1973, 248(9): p. 3188-95.
45. Iakoucheva, L.M., et al., The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Res., 2004, 32(3): p. 1037-1049.
46. Johnson, L.N. and R.J. Lewis, Structural basis for control by phosphorylation. Chem. Rev., 2001, 101: p. 2209-2242.
47. Kabsch, W. and C. Sander, On the use of sequence homologies to predict protein structure: identical pentapeptides can have completely different conformations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1984, 81(4): p. 1075-8.
48. Pal, S., et al., Human SWI/SNF-associated PRMT5 methylates histone H3 arginine 8 and negatively regulates expression of ST7 and NM23 tumor suppressor genes. Mol. Cell. Biol., 2004, 24: p. 9630-9645.