Imposing symmetry in least squares support vector machines regression

Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference, CDC-ECC '05

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 5716-5721

  Espinoza, Marcelo ^a   Suykens, Johan A K ^a   De Moor, Bart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; CONSTRAINT THEORY; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

DUAL SYSTEMS; REGULARIZATION; SOFT CONSTRAINTS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33847214167     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CDC.2005.1583074     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. L.A. Aguirre, R. Lopes, G. Amaral, and C. Letellier. Constraining the topology of neural networks to ensure dynamics with symmetry properties. Physical Review E, 69, 2004.
2. N. Cristianini and J. Shawe-Taylor. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
3. M. Espinoza, K. Pelckmans, L. Hoegaerts, J.A.K. Suykens, and B De Moor. A comparative study of LS-SVMs applied to the silverbox identification problem. In Proceedings of the 6th IFAC Conference on Nonlinear Control Systems (NOLCOS), 2004.
4. M. Espinoza, J. Suykens, and B De Moor. Partially linear models and least squares support vector machines. In Proc. of the 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2004.
5. M. Espinoza, J.A.K. Suykens, and B. De Moor. Model structure determination and identification with kernel based partially linear models. Technical Report 04-110, ESAT-SCD-SISTA, K.U.Leuven, Belgium, 2004.
6. M. Genton. Classes of kernel for machine learning: A statistics perspective. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2:299-312, 2001.
7. T. Johansen. Identification of non-linear systems using empirical data and prior knowledge-an optimization approach. Automatica, 32(3):337-356, 1996.
8. D.J.C. MacKay. Comparison of approximate methods for handling hyperparameters. Neural Computation, 11:1035-1068, 1999.
9. T. Poggio and F. Girosi. Networks for approximation and learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 78:1481-1497, 1990.
10. J. Schoukens, G. Nemeth, Y. Crama, P. abd Rolain, and R. Pintelon. Fast approximate identification of nonlinear systems. Automatica, 39(7), 2003.
11. J. Sjöberg, Q. Zhang, L. Ljung, A. Benveniste, B. Deylon, P. Glorennec, H. Hjalmarsson, and A. Juditsky. Nonlinear Black-box Modelling in System Identification: a Unified Overview. Automatica, 31:1691-1724, 1995.
12. J.A.K. Suykens, J. De Brabanter, L. Lukas, and J. Vandewalle. Weighted least squares support vector machines: robustness and sparse approximation. Neurocomputing, 48(1-4):85-105, 2002.
13. J.A.K. Suykens, T. Van Gestel, J. De Brabanter, B. De Moor, and J. Vandewalle. Least Squares Support Vector Machines. World Scientific, Singapore, 2002.
14. J.A.K. Suykens and J. Vandewalle. Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Processing Letters, 9:293-300, 1999.
15. J.A.K. Suykens and J Vandewalle. The k.u.leuven competition data: a challenge for advanced neural network techniques. In Proc. of the European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN'2000), pages 299-304, Brugges,Belgium, 2000.
16. V. Vapnik. The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer-Verlag, New-York, 1995.
17. G. Wahba. Spline Models for Observational Data. SIAM, Philadelphia, 1990.
18. A.S. Weigend and N.A. Gershenfeld, editors. Time Series Prediction. Forecasting the Future and Understanding the past. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1993.