Learning to orchestrate online instructional conversations: A case of faculty development for foreign language educators

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 5-19

  Meskill, Carla ^a   Anthony, Natasha ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847155510     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588220601118487     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andrews, S. (2003). Teacher language awareness and the professional knowledge base of the L2 teacher. Language Awareness, 12(2), 81-95.
2. Anton, M. (1999). The discourse of a learner-centered classroom: Sociocultural perspectives on teacher-learner interaction in the second-language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 83(iii), 303-318.
3. Basturkmen, S., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2004). Teachers' stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 243-272.
4. Becker, H. (1999). Teaching, learning, and computing, 1998: A national survey of schools and teachers. University of California at Irvine: CRITO.
5. Becker, H. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51), retrieved May, 20, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n51/
6. Celce-Murcia, M. (2002). Why it makes sense to teach grammar in context and through discourse. In E. Hinkel, & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 119-133). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Egbert, J., Paulus, T., & Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning Technology, 6(3), 108-126.
9. Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 397-417.
10. Goldenberg, C. (1991). Instructional conversations and their classroom application. Educational practice report: 2, National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning. Retrieved July 12, 2004, from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/ncrcdsll/epr2/index.html
11. Johnston, B., & Goettsch, K. (2000). In search of the knowledge base of language teaching: Explanations by experienced teachers. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(3), 437-468.
12. Judson, E. (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 581-597.
13. Kabilan, M. (2005). Online professional development: A literature analysis of teacher competency. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(2), 51-57.
14. Lam, Y. (2000). Technophilia vs. Technophobia: A preliminary look at why second-language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(3), 389-420.
15. Lantolf, J. (2001). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1-26). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, practice. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Meskill, C. (2002). Teaching and learning in real time: Media, technology, and language acquisition. Houston, TX: Athelstan.
18. Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2004). Teaching and learning with telecommunications: Instructional discourse in a hybrid Russian class. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33(2), 103-119.
19. Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2005). Foreign language learning with CMC: Forms of online instructional discourse in a hybrid Russian Class. System, 33(1), 89-105.
20. Meskill, C., Mossop, J., DiAngelo, S., & Pasquale, R. (2002). Expert and novice teachers talking technology: Precepts, concepts, and misconcepts. Language Learning & Technology, 6(3), 846-857.
21. Moll, L., & Whitmore, F. (1993). Vygotsky in classroom practice: Moving from individual transmission to social transaction. In E. Forman, N. Minick, & A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 19-42). New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Pollard, C., & Pollard, R. (2004). Research priorities in educational technology: A Delphi study. Journal of Research on Technology in Teacher Education, 37(2), 145-160.
23. Swain, M. (2002). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Tharp, R. (1993). Institutional and social context of educational practice and reform. In E. Forman, N. Minick, & A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 269-282). New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Tharp. R., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning and schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R. (1991). The instructional conversation: Teaching and learning in social activity. Research Report: 2, National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning. Retrieved July 12, 2004, from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/cnrcdsll/rr2.htm
27. Vygotsky, L. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144-188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
28. Wells, G. (1996). Using the tool-kit of discourse in the activity of learning and teaching. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(2), 74-101.