Impact of decision-making in a multidisciplinary perinatal team

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 97-103

  Bijma, Hilmar H ^a   Van Der Heide, Agnes ^a   Wildschut, Hajo I J ^a   Van Der Maas, Paul J ^a   Wladimiroff, Juriy W ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

End of life decisions; Fetal anomalies; Multidisciplinary decision making; Perinatal management; Ultrasound diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD CARE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FETUS MALFORMATION; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PERINATAL CARE; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; CONSENSUS; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEMALE; FETAL DISEASES; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PERINATAL CARE; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; TERMINAL CARE;

EID: 33847150437     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1598     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baldwin LM, Taplin SH, Friedman H, Moe R. 2004. Access to multidisciplinary cancer care: is it linked to the use of breast-conserving surgery with radiation for early-stage breast carcinoma? Cancer 100: 701-709.
2. Bijma HH, Wildschut HI, van der Heide A, van der Maas PJ, Wladimiroff JW. 2004a. Obstetricians' agreement on fetal prognosis after ultrasound diagnosis of fetal anomalies. Prenat Diagn 24: 713-718.
3. Bijma HH, Schoonderwaldt EM, van der Heide A, Wildschut HI, van der Maas PJ, Wladimiroff JW. 2004b. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal anomalies: an analysis of perinatal management of 318 consecutive pregnancies in a multidisciplinary setting. Prenat Diagn 24: 890-895.
4. Bijma HH, van der Heide A, Wildschut HI, et al. 2005. Survival after non-aggressive obstetric management in cases of severe fetal anomalies: a retrospective study. BJOG 112: 1630-1635.
5. Blumberg HH. 1994. Group decision making and choice shift. In Small Group Research: A Handbook, Hare AP, Blumberg HH, et al. (eds). Ablex Publishing: Westport, CT.
6. Britt DW, Risinger ST, Mans MK, Evans MI. 2002. Devastation and relief: conflicting meanings of detected fetal anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 20: 1-5.
7. Caniano DA, Baylis F. 1999. Ethical considerations in prenatal surgical consultation. Pediatr Surg Int 15: 303-309.
8. Carpenter MW, Corrado F, Sung J. 2000. Lethal fetal renal anomalies and obstetric outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 89: 149-152.
9. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. 1990. An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive management strategy for third-trimester pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 75: 311-316.
10. Christensen C, Abbott AS. 2000. Team medical decision making. In Decision Making in Health Care: Theory, Psychology, and Applications. Cambridge Series on Judgment and Decision Making, Chapman GB, Sonnenberg FA (eds). Cambridge University Press: New York.
11. Crombleholme TM, D'Alton M, Cendron M, et al. 1996. Prenatal diagnosis and the pediatric surgeon: the impact of prenatal consultation on perinatal management. J Pediatr Surg 31: 156-162, discussion 162-3.
12. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. 1984. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 74: 979-983.
13. Fisher BA, Ellis DG. 1990. Dimensions of the group process. Small Group Decision Making: Communication in the Group Process. McGraw-Hill: New York; 28-43.
14. Grundstein-Amado R. 1991. An integrative model of clinical-ethical decision making. Theor Med 12: 157-170.
15. Hall P, Weaver L. 2001. Interdisciplinary education and teamwork: a long and winding road. Med Educ 35: 867-875.
16. Hare A. 2003. Roles, relationships, and groups in. organizations: some conclusions and recommendations. Small Group Res 2: 123-154.
17. Hedrick HL, Flake AW, Crombleholme TM, et al. 2003. History of fetal diagnosis and therapy: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 18: 65-82.
18. Heling KS, Chaoui R, Kirchmair F, Stadie S, Bollmann R. 2002. Fetal ovarian cysts: prenatal diagnosis, management and postnatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 20: 47-50.
19. Hoeldtke NJ, Calhoun BC. 2001. Perinatal hospice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185: 525-529.
20. Hunfeld JA, Wladimiroff JW, Passchier J, Venema-Van Uden MU, Frets PG, Verhage F. 1993. Emotional reactions in women in late pregnancy (24 weeks or longer) following the ultrasound diagnosis of a severe or lethal fetal malformation. Prenat Diagn 13: 603-612.
21. Jones J, Hunter D. 1995. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 311: 376-380.
22. Larson JR Jr, Christensen C, Franz TM, Abbott AS. 1998. Diagnosing groups: the pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol 75: 93-108.
23. Lenard G. 1995. Ethical problems in prenatal diagnosis: pediatric considerations. Brain Dev 17(Suppl): 44-47.
24. Luks FI, Carr SR, Feith LR, Rubin LP. 2003. Experience with a multidisciplinary antenatal diagnosis and management model in fetal medicine. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 14: 333-337.
25. Mirlesse V, Cruz A, Le Bidois B. 2001. Perinatal management of fetal cardiac anoamies in a specialized obstetric-paediatrics center. Am J Perinatol 18: 363-371.
26. Molewijk AC, Stiggelbout AM, Otten W, Dupuis HM, Kievit J. 2003. Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: a plea for integrated empirical ethics research. Health Care Anal 11: 69-92.
27. Pellegrino ED. 1987. The anatomy of clinical-ethical judgments in perinatology and neonatology: a substantive and procedural framework. Semin Perinatol 11: 202-209.
28. Porter KB, Wagner PC, et al. 1988. Fetal Board: a multidisciplinary approach to management of the abnormal fetus. Obstet Gynecol 72: 275-278.
29. Spinnato JA, Cook VD, Cook CR, Voss DH. 1995. Aggressive intrapartum management of lethal fetal anomalies: beyond fetal beneficence. Obstet Gynecol 85: 89-92.
30. Stasser W. 1985. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making; biased information sampling during discussion. J Pers Soc Psychol 48: 1467-1478.